In post 191, Accountant wrote:Yes. I love townreads. I love being townread. I encourage everyone to townread me. I'm certainly not going to stop people from townreading me, unless it has nasty side effects like not taking me seriously because I am new - which doesn't seem to be the case here.
The thing is, when I'm town I generally expect to be seen as town, if not immediately then eventually. Maybe someone who has meta with you can tell me if you're frequent lynchbait or something, in which case you'd have reason to be paranoid. But if not then you'd probably want to correct Lowell's misconception, and expect that ultimately you could preserve his townread on you.
It's a bit like the "scum caught for the wrong reasons" tell in reverse. Town 'caught' for the wrong reasons should want to correct them.
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 7:36 am
by Accountant
I don't understand - if Lowell is doing a Good Thing(tm), and it has no bad side effects, why would I stop him from doing so? Yes, town values truth, but it doesn't value pointless distinction between truths. Lowell reading me as town because they think I'm a newb is no different from Lowell reading me as town because of [whatever].
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 7:38 am
by Accountant
I have mixed feelings about Tier as well. He's acting kinda shady but I can't put my finger on anything that says he's scum. I think his reads are more or less in line with mine as well(could be buddying, but he literally just pushed a wagon on me and hasn't rescinded his scumread)
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 8:14 am
by ChaosOmega
Carey: Who is your top scumread that isn't me?
Lycan: In post 156, you said the pist wagon pissed you off. Can you explain what exactly pissed you off about it?
pist: What do you think about Tier now? Also, any thoughts on the speedy wagon that built on you?
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 8:30 am
by Accountant
asking questions isn't content, imo, unless you're going to show town the thought process of you analyzing the question answers
gonna repeat this shit
i'd much rather you show me what you did with the answers from your last round of questions
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 8:52 am
by ChaosOmega
Who said it's content? It's helping me determine who I think is scum. If the answers don't strengthen my read and help me form a case, why say anything about it?
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 8:54 am
by Accountant
so nothing so far has helped you get any idea of who is scum?
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 9:03 am
by ChaosOmega
As for what I've asked so far, I've said I didn't like Mick's answer to my 38, and my follow up there wasn't responded to before he replaced out. Lycan's answer didn't do anything for me one way or the other. Umlaut's response to 112 made sense to me, so did Tier's to 139 after I reread 137. Your answer explained why you shifted off Umlaut, and here we are.
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 9:19 am
by Accountant
do you have a readslist or a general idea who is scum
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:43 am
by SnarkySnowman
Lowell has been prodded.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 5:20 am
by pistachi0n
I still don't like tier. Granted, I mixed him up earlier--I still don't like him though.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 5:33 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Vote him then.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 5:36 am
by Accountant
Still waiting for chaos to show us all he is actually participating in this game.
In post 202, Accountant wrote:I have mixed feelings about Tier as well. He's acting kinda shady but I can't put my finger on anything that says he's scum. I think his reads are more or less in line with mine as well(could be buddying, but he literally just pushed a wagon on me and hasn't rescinded his scumread)
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:03 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
You should vote him to help develop that read Accountant.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:04 am
by Accountant
I'm not comfortable voting him atm - whenever I try to make an internal case on him or try to "get" where he stands in my mind and why, it feels very vague and fuzzy. That's a sign that I'm conceptualizing his play incorrectly.
If I'm going to do this I'd much rather vote Chaos.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:23 am
by pistachi0n
In post 217, Accountant wrote:I'm not comfortable voting him atm - whenever I try to make an internal case on him or try to "get" where he stands in my mind and why, it feels very vague and fuzzy. That's a sign that I'm conceptualizing his play incorrectly.
You don't have to be so judicious with your votes unless he's on the verge of being lynched.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:23 am
by pistachi0n
That comment reads to me as scum trying to subtly push their scumbuddy to be less obviously scummy, but doesn't want to risk getting them lynched.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:29 am
by Accountant
Werewolves are confirmed to have daytalk. If that were the case, I'd just tell him in the mafia PT.
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:05 am
by pistachi0n
In post 222, Accountant wrote:Werewolves are confirmed to have daytalk. If that were the case, I'd just tell him in the mafia PT.