I think Snowstorm just hasn't read the game yet?In post 3143, Medical Junkies wrote:Bro, for what it's worth, I don't know anything about Snowstorm, but Transcend may not be faking the dumbtell. It may just be... well, Transcend.
-K
Uh that's exactly what's going on here.In post 3151, SnowStorm wrote:The timing of MJ's Bro read is not in question in DS's post.
OnlyIn post 3194, MagnaofIllusion wrote:But it's a scum trait right? You said so yourself. Admitting it doesn't make that go away, right?In post 3193, BROseidon wrote:The difference is that I admit when I'm wrong/fuck up.
You double down.
My case isn't empty?In post 3214, Zulfy wrote:@Broseidon it says here in your iso that you think mafia is a game of emotion more than logic but that hardly excuses your absolutely empty case against DS.
I feel like you don't know what this means.In post 3232, DiamondSentinel wrote:strawman arguments
Because he's scum. /threadIn post 3233, Zulfy wrote:My mind is incapable of picking up on your subtext BROseidon, help me out here please.
A singular "high-level reason" will do.
In post 3102, BROseidon wrote:It's a handful of things.In post 3091, Aristophanes wrote:Ah good, Bro is being helpful. LolIn post 3090, BROseidon wrote:MoI you can take the bullshit you keep peddling about me and shove it right up your ass.
I do totally agree though. MoI, I really dislike your discrediting on a Friendly Neighbour clear this early in the game.
Talk to me my friend! MJ obviously townreads you or they wouldn't confirm to you,and you are both on DS. What makes them scum to you?
His response to FB's fake guilty on Spiffeh is super bullshit - it looks like DS preparing for an inno flip because "omg Spiffeh/camntsuki so town by play." Like, that's never a reason to not trust or discredit a guilty result because people have wrong reads all the time, and not having self-awareness of that is obviously not a realistic thing to expect.
His play in the game has, in general, been disruptive and non-productive. His reads are relatively static, and he doesn't seem to take into consideration new information.
Plus he just says a lot of incredibly dumb shit that I wouldn't expect town to say on questioning fairly fundamental theory points. Usually that sort of shit comes from scum (hiplop should remember Chicagomeet where literally only scum asked me in Deathnote's Deathnote game why I started the game out by claiming hated, as if a hated townie should ever start the game not claiming immediately. DS has been doing shit like that)
tbf I've said my piece about MoI.In post 3393, Gammagooey wrote:@Zulfy- I'd be happy to be proven wrong but MoI went up to about 5 votes earlier today (game day), the wagon basically immediately went back down to 3, and now it's at just me and one other person on it immediately after I try to pull people onto it for the second time. I'm the only one actually arguing for it instead of just being willing to do it so it seems really unlikely to happen from the feel of the game I have- I haven't gone through individual player's opinions on him like you did but it's been 2-3 days since I started pushing, I think pretty much everyone's popped in at some point or another since then (except for MoI himself, funnily enough) and nobody else seemed like they wanted to do MoI specifically over the other current wagons.
Also you seemed to abandon the idea later in your post anyway but trying to actively pull people off of their wagons onto MoI like I've done here would be absolutely retarded if we were scum together.
The fact that MoI can get away with posting shit like this just makes me sad for the expected quality of play on this site.In post 3403, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Having a Neighborhood with Bro in addition to Bro confirming you are a friendly Neighbor isn’t something that justifies this kind of posting.
Your role is non-standard. You didn’t explain it in any sort of clear fashion and when you keep making statements that don’t on the surface seem to match the limited information you have given you are going to get questions.
People don't want to lynch DS because ~reasons~
I haven't said my play's been exemplary? There isn't even subtext of that here.In post 3473, MagnaofIllusion wrote:The fact that Bro continues to post useless crap like this makes me sad that he thinks his play is exemplary of high quality play.In post 3469, BROseidon wrote:The fact that MoI can get away with posting shit like this just makes me sad for the expected quality of play on this site.In post 3403, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Having a Neighborhood with Bro in addition to Bro confirming you are a friendly Neighbor isn’t something that justifies this kind of posting.
Your role is non-standard. You didn’t explain it in any sort of clear fashion and when you keep making statements that don’t on the surface seem to match the limited information you have given you are going to get questions.
They claimed a conf-town role. You don't fucking question it unless I flip scum.* Really, REALLY not hardIn post 3475, Grib wrote:Bro: MJ contradicted their own claim. Of course they're going to get questioned about it. I don't understand why you think that post by Magna in particular is shit.
~Literally nothing to do with what I said~In post 3476, DiamondSentinel wrote:And do tell what the fuck you had to do with that.In post 3471, BROseidon wrote:"This game is turning out so terribly"
1/3 people dead so far are scum.
Pick one.
Or are you claiming SK?
I don't need to insult you when you post shit like this. Since you're apparently not capable of processing that how a game is going for each faction can change over time.In post 3477, DiamondSentinel wrote:Just because there is a scum dead doesn't mean the game is going well. I can name numerous counter examples.
I never flub claims.In post 3533, Grib wrote:I'm not the biggest fan of blind faith when it looks like someone messed up their claim.In post 3527, BROseidon wrote:They claimed a conf-town role. You don't fucking question it unless I flip scum.* Really, REALLY not hardIn post 3475, Grib wrote:Bro: MJ contradicted their own claim. Of course they're going to get questioned about it. I don't understand why you think that post by Magna in particular is shit.
*Which I won't because I'm town this game.
Incredibly common/not necessarily bad play.In post 3544, Spiffeh wrote:The only issue with MJ's conf. town status is that they haven't done jack shit to actually help find scum ever since
Naw he really didn't.In post 3615, hiplop wrote:I thought he was scum. Sigh.In post 3607, BROseidon wrote:Snarky wasn't obvious scum, though. He was obvious Snarky.
Nacho did a good job framing him
Tbf that Snarky wagon was a scum-designated mislynch to save your ass, so...In post 3630, DiamondSentinel wrote:It was a collective thing. The town in general was wrong. And still is b
As scum with him in Buzzfeed who yelled at him constantly to post more.In post 3642, Medical Junkies wrote:Unfortunately, I think you jumped too quickly pulling out that card. It became Day Three... yesterday. You ruined your chances to optimize the effectiveness of that statement.
You just called it moonlogic for scum to drive a mislynch as a counterwagon to their partner being run up.In post 3678, DiamondSentinel wrote:Yep. That was totally it. You caught us.In post 3672, BROseidon wrote:Tbf that Snarky wagon was a scum-designated mislynch to save your ass, so...In post 3630, DiamondSentinel wrote:It was a collective thing. The town in general was wrong. And still is b
Oh wait. This is the most asinine moonlogic I have ever heard. Instead of working to make a counter-wagon, which would end up resulting in my death anyways, why the fuck wouldn't they instead work to make me seem as townie as possible instead of settling for a temporary solution. That is absolutely ridiculous, and you should feel fucking ashamed that you are even entertaining the idea.
You have played multiple games with me. I want you to look back at each of them, and tell me what behaviors are repeated from those in this one.
That would require you to have said anything that's perfectly reasonable this game. So, no.In post 3701, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I have to put up with Bro so no sympathy from me.In post 3700, Cephrir wrote:Cannot believe you guys are gonna make me put up with someone who calls other people morons for being perfectly reasonable.
Should I wonder why the minute I move my vote you move over to hiplop?
I already said that Ceph's probably scum, and have thought Gamma's slot is scum for a while?In post 3753, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Yeah, if this wasn't anything but empty fluffery you'd be looking at all the vote movement after DS got to L-1 and parsing who was scum and who was Town.In post 3751, BROseidon wrote:And another day where scum-DS ALMOST gets lynched but slips through.
Because clearly all the players not voting for DS can't be scum.
But nope ... just more fluff one-lining.
The reason I'm saying it's obvious at this point is that everyone's just ignoring the fact that hiplop's been super inactive site-wide but then citing inactivity in this game as a reason to scumread him.
