Mini 2059: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Over]

[u r a person 2]

I don't think 'has a handle on state of game' is same as 'knowing everything that has happened in the game'. So you can show that he has been following the game as of late, which I think isn't completely inaccurate. But I am pretty tired of his constant missing things in this game, and he has been doing it a lot. He misses context. He skims incessantly. I am just tired of it.

okay, examples

VOTE: brigitte

[u r a person 2]

Oh i remember why your skimming was associated with me. You were talking about skipping the page that was 100% me and enter

[u r a person 2]

I remember thinking at the time that I didn't blame you

[u r a person 2]

@Nimueh: How do you have posts of Ank's you agree with when you haven't even read the first page of the game?

@Brig: yeah, I think you pretty much just rehashed a lot of the thoughts I was having when going through your exchange. I really don't see a townie side to the manufactured interaction Ank had with you at all and urap and skitter both look significantly worse for their parts in the process. I'm ok with an ank or nimueh lynch at this point, I think. I think I want to look more closely at urap and skitter before I make definite reads on them, I feel weird because I was pretty sure of urap as town earlier but I don't really see much town to his play here, either.

I think you need to go back and re read that entire exchange because your reading of it seems nuts. Brig basically called ank lock scum for asking reck his opinion on brig's case on ank. That's a ridiculous stance, and it was a ridiculous stance when skitter and I said it was a ridiculous stance.

And it was scummy, ridiculous, and poor sportsmanship to scream "read the game" at reck a dozen times while he was trying to engage.

[u r a person 2]

actually if I had doubts about one of them it would be urap2.
I found his whole questioning about reckoner not reading thing pretty pointless. Not sure why he thought that was important to establish other than finding me being annoying by trolling reckoner.

I'm not sure what the scum motivation for shouting "read the game" 100 times was.

But I know that it's not townie. And I know that if you had been saying it to me, I would have either exploded at you or replaced out immediately.

And I think any reasonable person would know that responding to everything with "read the game" is going to provoke someone

which brings me back to, if you're town, what in the world reason would you have to provoke reck here?

I don't think that behavior should even be tolerated in a game, ever.

[u r a person 2]

He was the person to put the second vote on when I voted for pressure on Chara (cuz he said I needed it to actually apply pressure) so he should know that putting a vote on and saying it's for applying pressure makes the vote not matter. the fact that it's still there as you shoot closer to L-1 really pings me.

I just realized it's way later than I intended on staying up, though, so I'll look at this more tomorrow.

This isn't a pressure vote. I want brigitte lynched now. And If she's going to push this whole "reck read the game" bullshit to the point of being abusive and toxic, as she did

and if she is going to then offer to give me examples for how she knew he wasn't reading

and I ask for those examples

Then she needs to give me those examples. Because the play from brig was fucking abhorrent and needs to be substantiated.

[u r a person 2]

I dunno, 10 games in and I haven't had a problem yet.

We can call people scum without trying to make the game a rage inducing experience for the person we suspect

after all, they r a person, 2

[u r a person 2]

damn, even more reason not to try and send them into a rage.

I've asked the thread generally a number or times now, but here's to you specifically.

What motivation did you have for provoking him like that?

[u r a person 2]

if the whole point of your play there was to troll him into getting angry because you found it amusing,

I still don't see how that helps you solve the game, or helps him solve the game, or anything else.

and if there was no game-related purpose, then it was simply mean-spirited.

[u r a person 2]

You know, you're probably right.

The best course of action isn't for me to push a pl. But I also refuse to play with you.

@Mod Please replace me. So sorry.

[u r a person 2]

Don't talk about this it's not related to this game. ~MariaR