Look- redemption: these votes early on don't mean anything. We need 7/13 votes to lynch you, and anyone putting you at L-2, L-1, or HAMMERING without a rock solid reason (which they won't have) so soon is effectively scum-claiming.
There will be like 4 or 5 wagons before the end of the day, so no worries at all.
If you think "people voting on me" = "I'm screwing up/being bad" then that is completely and 100% wrong.
recent site rules prohibit replacement talk/discussion, and it's unwise to bring that up especially considering PenguinPower is kind of a big scary mod person https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=79321
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 4:34 pm
by Redemption
You know what.
Maybe I'm just having a bad day. I'm pretty sure I'll feel better by wednesday.
I'll just live with the consequences of my actions. One thing for sure, I definitely won't let that happen ever again.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 5:28 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 155, schadd_ wrote:maybe mjl is town bc it looks like this sort of thing is just what she does
There has been 3 consecutive lynches on Schadd. I know that was during RVS (and we probably still are) but might just have been as a context to execute a scum plan without town questioning it.
And Lucky, why have you relynched me this time? I thought I made myself clear about my RVS lynch situation.
More like I feel really really really bad about myself and might need a break from this game. Or drink a lot.
Whoa there buddy, get some help
Also if mafia gives you those feelings I'd prefer you not play since I don't anyone to kill themselves over a mafia game
MJL, why did you read and respond to parts of my post 130 but not respond to my vote on you?
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 1:45 am
by MaryJoLisa
In post 213, ChannelDelibird wrote:MJL, why did you read and respond to parts of my post 130 but not respond to my vote on you?
You were stating your view, but you were not asking me to follow up on anything. Also, I didn't find your vote to be particularly unreasonable. I'm assuming we don't know each other, so you don't know what kinds of things are stressors for me. Your vote struck me as logical under the circumstances as I'm perceiving them.
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 3:38 am
by Redemption
Alright, I feel much better now.
I'm not happy about myself right now. I'm finding out that I'm so weak at reading.
Anyway, I'll wrap my head tighter on the game tomorrow. I have some things to do for school today.
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 5:32 am
by GuyInFreezer
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 7:13 am
by LuckyOtter
Why are so many people not voting?
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 7:15 am
by MaryJoLisa
I haven't found a reason to vote yet.
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 7:16 am
by PenguinPower
Voting helps move the game forward. Even random votes help convey information later on.
Let's lynch scum instead of policy lynches. also I see you voted nm, then changed to redemption, then advocated you're still wanting the nm policy. bizarre.
In post 130, ChannelDelibird wrote:Performer - if you were happy to name your two townreads when PP asked, why not name them as a matter of course when writing 124?
it was provided that way so people would ask, and then I could hopefully get a better read on someone if they asked about it. what came about from that was an extra tr.
In post 155, schadd_ wrote:maybe mjl is town bc it looks like this sort of thing is just what she does
??
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 9:27 am
by Performer
Also, cdb's 130 call out of mary's 71 is odd to me. How is that anti town? the most I could get from that after rereading over and over, was a slight town tone. because it looks like she's simply wondering about the setup.
also want to hear more from lil uz & nm (who hasnt posted in over 2 days).
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 9:31 am
by Performer
schadd, why do you still think lucky is a good vote?
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 9:31 am
by MaryJoLisa
So
@Mod
are we keeping Redemption or not? I'm not clear on the rules, so I'd like to know the status of this player.