Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 1:32 pm
pagetop!
Y not (why not)?In post 203, Sashaddin wrote:HURT: Blake Belladona, Implosion
After reading through I'm not vouching for those two right now.
Math is wonderful, I'm a math teacher.In post 99, implosion wrote:Math Fact: if a single town member refuses to enter coalitions, it becomes 350% more difficult for the town to form a successful coalition!
isn't math wonderful?
Blake: 90, 102, 152In post 205, Quest wrote:Y not (why not)?In post 203, Sashaddin wrote:HURT: Blake Belladona, Implosion
After reading through I'm not vouching for those two right now.
Implosion: The general tone, a little of OMGUS for voting me, and I feel he's posting a lot for show (LAMIST?)In post 205, Quest wrote:Y not (why not)?In post 203, Sashaddin wrote:HURT: Blake Belladona, Implosion
After reading through I'm not vouching for those two right now.
You're probably right, but this is my first coalition game so it made sense in my head. What's wrong about this?In post 208, Quest wrote:That doesn't seem like a great reason.
I also don't think that's a great reason. Do you think I'm posting a lot for show as well?In post 209, Sashaddin wrote:Implosion: The general tone, a little of OMGUS for voting me, and I feel he's posting a lot for show (LAMIST?)In post 205, Quest wrote:Y not (why not)?In post 203, Sashaddin wrote:HURT: Blake Belladona, Implosion
After reading through I'm not vouching for those two right now.
I just think it's very narrow-minded to remove her from your coalition because she said she'd rather not be in one. If you town read someone, and I'm not saying this is the case here, you should be adding them to your coalition.In post 210, Sashaddin wrote:You're probably right, but this is my first coalition game so it made sense in my head. What's wrong about this?In post 208, Quest wrote:That doesn't seem like a great reason.
Pre-150, he's very confident in his posts, strong out of the gate. Very affirmative and ... heavy (can't find a way to say it otherwise ).In post 211, Blake Belladonna wrote:What's pinging you about implosion's tone?
Well my vote on him was a RVS. And yes I was purely basing myself on those 3 posts, I took them as a "demand" rather than a comment.In post 213, Quest wrote:It feels like you're purely going off of those 3 (three) posts, and that's the only reason why you decided to hurt her. I think it's based on flimsy reasoning, and I don't think it should change your stance on her (if you had any to begin with).
In post 218, Sashaddin wrote:Oh sorry Blake you are a her