In post 1113, Alisae wrote: In post 1032, Iconeum wrote:636 finally is more extensive, but alas made up.
'Luca - His whole ISO sucks. Nothing in there is actually substanial at all. All of his reads come across as making stuff up on the fly (a lot of times when he is talking about a read, he gives himself room for said read to go either way). He's not really taking any risks and is in general playing really safe. I really want to see Luca go after something instead of just do nothing. Because a lot of what his ISO is nothing. And anything that like, remotely looks like analysis is really surface level stuff.
54 is just a gut scummy start mostly because I don't like the fact he has to feel like he has to have a stance first thing.'
Did anyone think Luca was shading/not taking a stance? I sure didn't. Because he was.
After this there is a TON of bullshit posts directed at Luca that contain little more then 'waah waah scum is crying' or worse.
I seriously don't feel like Ali is serious about this case he has on Luca, and it feels like the ketchup was 'steered' onto a Luca scumread from the getgo.
A lot of the content in this post is "Ali isn't explaining anything"
thats intentional, that catch-up was mostly for myself.
I was always planing on writing a few posts wraping up my general thoughts.
602 is where I mentioned that I was going to touch up on it, and I followed through on that.
As for this itself, one thing I saw a lot in Luca's ISO was that he was leaving a lot of room in how he was talking about reads for things to change, and he was doing this about like, mostly everything. It really bothered me. He did it for you, he did it for Klick, he did it for Datisi. His play really came across as adjusting his reads to tailor to what was going on at the time.
Why did you think the catch-up was for you?
It wasn't, it was for me to get up to speed and caught up.
None of this is how I see things. You had 'intention' to do those things, but instead during your catchup you decided to completely ignore the relevant stuff. You say you did it for yourself and to get 'caught up', but failed to provide any meaningfull response to actual things happening in game and started pushing your own narrative. Revisiting this later, once we have a flip.
In post 1119, Datisi wrote: In post 1118, Iconeum wrote: In post 1068, Iconeum wrote: In post 1066, Datisi wrote:To be honest, going through that post, reading Ali's comments and then reading back to Luca's posts, it's just reminded me why I thought he was scum in the first place. His posts still feel fabricated and manipulative in a way that you "want" to agree with them.I still don't see scum!Ali's motivation here.
Ok if that's your actual point of view on Luca that's fine
. You also like Ali's progression towards scumreading Luca?
This is me accepting you can genuinly feel what you are seeing.
I seriously doubt I ever mentioned Ali having good or better reasons for voting Luca, I've been pretty adamant about my opinion that Ali's case is based on thin air.
Guess I misunderstood you saying "come to terms". I just felt that mine and Ali's reasons are kinda close, so I didn't get why accept mine but not theirs.
Also I have a faint memory of someone saying something along the lines of "Ali explained their reads while Datisi gave shit vague explanations", but at this point I have no idea if that actually happened and who said it if it did.
Did you see the actual reasons Ali provided for Luca? I cannot believe you townread those. I can understand you townreading your white knight, but not for the reasons Ali specified (THIS IS SCUM, LYYYYYYYNCH, BRUUUUH).
In post 1215, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I could easily do what you’re saying & have a vote down to have a stance as scum. No issue. I want to actually try to focus & place what I think is a good vote
Only you don't. Once Ali replaced in and this game took a turn towards activity and stuff, there were a bunch of camps being formed and a LOT happened you could have an opinion about. You disappeared completely. To me that reads like you were content letting those players fight it out. But there was no sorting coming from you in any way shape or form.
If you had actually read everything, you'd know most players stances.
This is the most opportunistic vote I've seen all game. Once you see that the Datisi wagon is stalling, and people from both the Scum!Datisi and Scum!Luca camp are starting to look towards you, you hop onto the 'popular' wagon?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Emperor
