Alright, it would appear that overall expectations for level of analysis and contribution are much higher from my first game. Our towniest player wrote in 1-2 sentence posts and said I was their highest town read. I've been in the middle ground of effort, which apparently is worse(?) than being low effort. It seems to be giving off the idea that I am pretending to contribute while not giving enough substantive information to back up the reads offered. Allow me to correct my own laziness then.
NorwegianboyEE
- Initial opening onto Chemist, gives and defends reasons for voting. Plays similarly to myself with a cautious, evidence-based voting style. Tries his best to offer analytics, but again like myself is not too good at catching the subtler tells. Mentions my playstyle reminds them of themselves as scum. Has kept vote on Chemist from the beginning, mostly due to having no other convincing voting options in his opinion. Probably town, but the comment on how their scum game reminds them of how I play makes me wonder. -
Null
/
Micc
- Clearly very experienced SE, offers detailed insight into his aggressive and inquisitive playstyle. Lower end of postcount, but overall every post has substance and pushes his agenda. Seems dead set at this point on lynching me and frankly I'm not entirely certain as to why. I'm playing roughly the same as my last game, albeit with more confidence after my first successful town win, and I was a high town read by almost all players. Probably just difference in playstyle I'm guessing. Micc looks to be trying to lead town which at his experience level is very good for us if he is town but very very bad if he is scum. Null read for now, but to say I don't like him is probably just OMGUS. -
Null
Farren
- He is asking a lot of questions, but not providing much analysis. His given reason for voting me is pretty weak in my opinion, basically is saying "your read is wrong IMO, you're scum!". Reading over his ISO again, might actually be my scummiest read. -
Jamelia
- Lowest contribution to the town so far. Playing the "wait and see" game without doing much else. Last post stated he would be providing a full analysis on reads soon, so I'll be waiting on that. Overall I don't have a whole lot to go on so I am looking forward to reading his reads. -
Null
Mr Oobsy
- Love the usage of colored fonts and bolded names, makes his posts easy to read through. I really don't like the No Lynch vote, but that could have been a play to get reactions from different people. I really dig his attitude overall. Actively applies pressure with voting instead of sitting on an empty vote. Probably my highest town read. -
Leucosticte
- Experienced in the game but a newbie to the Mafiascum meta. Probably just adjusting to how the meta goes here, but he makes the mistake of trying to make PR reads, potentially endangering important town roles on our first day. Does it again later on as well. Comically, he even put himself in his reads, talking highly of himself. Probably town, just figuring out the forum meta like the rest of us newbies. -
Chemist
- Looking back on it, probably used initial RVS to bait an unwary scum voter. Posts might be short, but they offer substance. Wish he'd offer more opinions on things, but he did mention most of what he's got revolves around PRs and he doesn't want to risk getting people NK'd so maybe he is just playing it safe. -
Skitter
- Highest postcount, albeit many are a short one-liner. Nonetheless, posts have substance and she is actively trying to find scum. Very sorry if I got her pronoun wrong earlier. Scumleans are Norwegian and Farren, which are actually my two most favorable scumleans as well. -
Also, a meta question. Are analytical reads as important as I am making them out to be? The SEs are all, from what I can tell, more focused on narrower lines of inquistion instead of broad analysis.
Lastly
VOTE: Farren