What case? You can't back anything you're saying up in any form of solid statement at all. And even if you DID have a case on him, I wouldn't care about it. He has a partner. He will make it to the next phase and the only thing you can do about it is lynch him in the next phase.In post 1897, Gentleman 6 wrote:fuck off with this stupid oversimplification of my case on him. if that's all you got from my case, the issue is with you and not me.In post 1894, Gentleman 4 wrote:You're scumreading him because your reads don't align?In post 1878, Gentleman 6 wrote:like it's not hard to have townreads in this game. a lot of slots have been towny. you're sitting around shading all the people that i'm townreading who aren't so obvtown as to be literally impossible to go after.
except the one person who scumreads a bunch of really terrible people to scumread.
Dude. Wait until tomorrow, PLEASE.
Gentleman 6 I'm going to be very honest with you. I don't care less who you do and do not want dead right now. I don't care who you're scum reading. I don't care that you're paranoid. You're acting like a chicken that just lost its head. Your play right now is disruptive and anti-town. Your current moves have been directionless, backless, and vacuous. Sit down and wait until Pre-Dance is done to begin screaming like a child watching his first horror film again, please.
Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Thank you.In post 1903, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm not engaging with anyone besides L4.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
@Lady 2these were for you from earlier:In post 1333, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 2, I would like to see your analysis of the current matching as well as your reads list, if possible. The more numbers you can attach to things, the more jubilant I become.In post 1334, Gentleman 4 wrote:In addition, how comfortable are you in your scum game? If you could have paired with any of the gentlemen prior to them making the matches they have now, who would you have chosen? If your answer is Gentleman 2, please also include your second choice.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 1930, Gentleman 5 wrote:
This never got answered, it was actually interesting cause G6 seemed to waiver on if his pair on L8 was town recentlyIn post 1441, Gentleman 5 wrote:
That was fast. In fact thats the first thing L8 mentions: making sure shes going to the next round.In post 1270, Lady 8 wrote:I'm reading. I'm trying to commit to at least one catchup a day.
In post 1005, Gentleman 6 wrote:Whatever disregard correct play dance with the hottest girl.
Lady 8, will you dance with me?I accept.
G6: You mentioned it after you made the proposal but Id like to ask you again - do you think your pairing is T-T?Spoiler: Yes it did.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yes. How are you?In post 1931, Gentleman 2 wrote:Evening all.
I have set aside all prior obligations for the night and my sole attention will be on this game. Anyone around?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
My bad, I apologize.In post 1941, Gentleman 5 wrote:Im talking about the G6 part.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
@Lady 2, I'm not going to quote your post here for the purpose of minimizing the amount of time people have to scroll down through items they've already seen, but I very much appreciate your response. If it makes you feel even slightly better, you were a close second place to Lady 3, and I'm honestly rather surprised you haven't been matched yet. How caught up on the game are you right now?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Relax. Looking for wagons right now is rash - there are a lot of things that I think several players haven't said yet, and it would be remarkably hasty of you to try and get my sweetheart killed before I get a word in. I think trying to enter the dance phase at anything faster than a relaxed pace is foolish.In post 2017, Gentleman 5 wrote:G4 and G2: please be prepared for shit to hit the fan at the dance if L5 is alive or flips town. I hope yall can control the wagons cause we will probably be looking for a 1v1- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
For the purpose of sanity. Reads have little part to play in the above, you'll notice that I've tried to keep those rather veiled for the time being (with varying degrees of success).In post 2032, Gentleman 5 wrote:
L6 should be asked first.In post 2022, Gentleman 4 wrote:For the purpose of sanity, I hope Gentleman 1 becomes more active and asks Lady 2, and Gentleman 3 asks Lady 1, who in turn maintains her current activity trend.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Ah. I see, you were threatening to take my mental health, not my girl.In post 2038, Gentleman 5 wrote:
.... I wasnt talking about L3?In post 2033, Gentleman 4 wrote:
Relax. Looking for wagons right now is rash - there are a lot of things that I think several players haven't said yet, and it would be remarkably hasty of you to try and get my sweetheart killed before I get a word in. I think trying to enter the dance phase at anything faster than a relaxed pace is foolish.In post 2017, Gentleman 5 wrote:G4 and G2: please be prepared for shit to hit the fan at the dance if L5 is alive or flips town. I hope yall can control the wagons cause we will probably be looking for a 1v1- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Speaking from the place of someone who has intentionally manipulated emotions in order to gain town reads from this and based on the fact that Lady 6 seems very much in control of herself (and has revealed she feels comfortable in a mafia game and is at least somewhat experienced) this is hardly alignment indicative, in my opinion. None of her actions have been not reproducible from a scum perspective and the items you discuss here aren't even particularly game relevant.In post 2042, Gentleman 5 wrote:
I liked the entrance from yesterday, it was wayyyy to agressive and stubborn to come from scum.In post 2034, Lady 1 wrote:L5 is playing so bad it has to be town.
G6, G5, why the strong L6 town reads?
The fact she stopped after overreacting is good too.
Lady 8's response to this:In post 2041, Lady 1 wrote:I’m thinking this game is 2G/1L. I think if L6 isn’t scum, L8’s auto acceptance from nowhere is scum indicative. Would make sense too if 2G/1L.
In post 1659, Lady 8 wrote:
Uh, because I was already pretty insistent that I wanted to pair with G6 since like the start of the game?In post 1443, Gentleman 5 wrote:
Add to that L8 - why did you accept that so fast?In post 1441, Gentleman 5 wrote:
That was fast. In fact thats the first thing L8 mentions: making sure shes going to the next round.In post 1270, Lady 8 wrote:I'm reading. I'm trying to commit to at least one catchup a day.
In post 1005, Gentleman 6 wrote:Whatever disregard correct play dance with the hottest girl.
Lady 8, will you dance with me?I accept.
G6: You mentioned it after you made the proposal but Id like to ask you again - do you think your pairing is T-T?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Gentleman 2, I apologize. There's a lot going on right now. I very much appreciate the effort you're putting in. 1959 seems to cover just about everything mechanically speaking. What are your thoughts on the current single Ladies/Gentleman and perspective matches?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I imagine you mean Gentleman 5 here?In post 2066, Gentleman 6 wrote:
Man.In post 2062, Lady 5 wrote:Except that I’m Town so now think of this from my perspective.
Your being a moron RN is what I’m getting at.
Also don’t refuse to answer my questions you better answer them.
@Someone
Can you make sure to re post my post with the questions to G6 if I end up dying from not having a partner.
I don't want to brute force a lynch on G4. I want to get L4 to do it for me because I don't want to go through all of that hassle.
Do you get that, do you get why I'm not like arguing with everyone's townreads on G5 in thread?
I don't think having 3 town reads and 3 scum reads is too few. I think a lot of people are around there. I think the number of reads he has doesn't matter until we begin discussing reads in excess, which conveniently will be when we have the ability to lynch, and when our reads become relevant.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Who is this to?In post 2078, Lady 3 wrote:Promise me not to leave and let us lunch you instead- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You haven't pointed out why she's town.In post 2083, Gentleman 6 wrote:L6 still isn't scum.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
No, he didn't.In post 2089, Lady 5 wrote:
He did recently actually.In post 2085, Gentleman 4 wrote:
You haven't pointed out why she's town.In post 2083, Gentleman 6 wrote:L6 still isn't scum.
He pointed out why she isn't scum.In post 2092, Lady 5 wrote:
ThisIn post 2073, Gentleman 6 wrote:Eh honestly that I'd take G8 and leave dance post was towny.
I believe I already answered this at the time.G5 did.
Their posting was never scummy. It was bad in certain ways, but it didn't feel scum motivated.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I haven't played with scum them, but I'll look at their games. I don't understand why it isn't possible or likely that it comes from both, from what I hear she's relatively capable.In post 2095, Gentleman 6 wrote:Lady 6 using moonlogic is something that would NEVER come from town them :thonk:- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What? Why? Why is it nitpicky to assert that just because a player isn't necessarily playing like scum doesn't mean that they're particularly town? Especially since I believe you wanted to see her matched first. "Not scum" doesn't really get you to the top town read slot in the game, or at least it definitely shouldn't.In post 2099, Gentleman 6 wrote:That's a pretty underwhelming nitpick to make here G4- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Certain characters have decided to try and kill each other before we even have vote counts to go off of. I think several players are trying to approach this phase like a normal day 1 instead of holding the punches until the blows can hit the other player.In post 2091, Gentleman 2 wrote:
Thats the part that is going to be harder for me to just jump into, i kinda need someone to walk with me whispering in my ear who people are, their relationships to each other and motivations.In post 2070, Gentleman 4 wrote:Gentleman 2, I apologize. There's a lot going on right now. I very much appreciate the effort you're putting in. 1959 seems to cover just about everything mechanically speaking. What are your thoughts on the current single Ladies/Gentleman and perspective matches?
Like I have some observations about the gamestate but i dont have the human face behind the facts. does that make sense?
And what else is going on beyond trying to figure out what lady gets left behind and who the last 3 gents dance with?
What you're saying makes sense and I apologize, but I'm not really in a place to help you without dropping everything I'm doing at the moment unless the thread slows down significantly. If you wait a few days I can probably help you more.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
No lady has declined yet, I think Lady 5 did post before Lady 4 accepted, however.In post 2140, Gentleman 2 wrote:G5 you asked L5 to dance, did she decline or did you ask L4 before L5 answered you?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What on earth does this even mean?In post 2169, Lady 6 wrote:
I am beginning to think you are a town pig. You just can't resist rolling in mud. Jesus Christ.In post 2168, Gentleman 4 wrote:He's going to have control either way, Lady 6. Lady 3's post is literally just a copy of the order several other Gentleman have proposed multiple times today, just emboldened and enlarged.
No one here is disagreeing with this. Count the ladies and then count the gentlemen. At least in the plan you quoted, Gentleman 8 has the least control, but he's going to have control regardless. If you're wondering why I accused you of having almost no awareness earlier, it's times like these.We don't need an order. We need proposals.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Saying you aren't exemplifying objective qualities is an effort to get you to fix and repair those qualities (or acquire where lacking) - lack of awareness can be fixed by reading the thread more and trying to approach again. I haven't yet insulted you personally yet, nor said you are something, and everything I've said is pertaining to the game.In post 2175, Lady 6 wrote:
I didn't call you a name anymore than you saying I lack awareness for stating the obvious. The last proposed gets to pick who lives and dies. That is the most control, not least.In post 2173, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 6 stop calling people names and just play mafia.
You calling me a pig and telling me to go die are just you lashing out at me - it serves no productive purpose and it's not relevant to the game. Stop. It's childish and petty.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Saying the things you do are bad should be triggers to get you to stop doing those things, not reasons for you to just start name calling.
She meant no insult by it.In post 2178, Lady 6 wrote:
Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:
It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen byIn post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts thatnotrequesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Well I wonder who ruined that by blowing their load before they got to the bedroom.In post 2208, Gentleman 6 wrote:
Only works if they don't already know they're in the hot seat.In post 2205, Lady 5 wrote:That’s actually a smart play.
Get to know your partner so if they are scum you can have a pretty decent idea as to whom their buddies are.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I wasn't talking to you.In post 2229, Lady 5 wrote:
How is my thoughts here bad in anyway?In post 2227, Gentleman 4 wrote:You're effectively fighting against yourself at this point - you're acting so quickly and rashly you counter your own moves before you can make them.
Explain that to me.
Explain to me how my L1 and L6 Post is bad.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This was a bit excessive, I'll admit. I'm sorry, I got a bit pretentious, I'm just frustrated. I haven't given up on you, Gentleman 6, but you've been a bit chaotic and unsettling lately, and you bring stresses to the table before were really properly equipped to handle them. I'm not sure how many pages your quibble with Gentleman 5 went on (and I added to it as well, I'll admit), but it certainly put pages into the thread that don't need to be read. I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't give up on me, and I think that we have enough players playing a decent enough town game that we are set up to do well tomorrow as long as we don't screw it up. I'd rather be your teammate than your rival. Can we agree to relax until the next phase?In post 2222, Gentleman 4 wrote:Gentleman 6 if you'd shut up and play the game instead of worrying about endless possibilities and grasping for control, you wouldn't be losing control so quickly that you'll soon forget you had any sway in the first place. Shut up and sit down.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Lady 5 you made it evident recently you still aren't aware of relatively core events of this game in your discussion with Gentleman 6 on the topic of Fire bringer and guessing who's main is who's. Post game I'm more than willing to try to discuss with you your problems with your play, although I'll admit that I'm no paragon myself, but right now you don't appear to be a remarkable asset (although the only Lady that I particularly want to ensure is still in the game next phase of Lady 2, so you're not particularly lagging when compared to some of your competition).- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I didn't look through your whole ISO but this is relatively close to it. You have also at least twice said she's a good remove.In post 803, Gentleman 6 wrote:I don't. 1 and 6 are either going to start posting or get replaced. 5's posting gives me a headache and I think they're above average scum equity.
PEdit: He's talking to you.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I agree, for the most part, but think we should all wait until the next phase before we worry about who lives and who doesn't.In post 2267, Lady 4 wrote:I got to the end of 85 and I am done for the night
You should all post less
I'm feeling sad that I may not get to play much of this game if this conflict continues, it's the most fun game I've been in in quite a while- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Stop. I absolutely refuse to try to lynch Gentleman 5 (or any other player for that matter) regardless of my read on him if not given the opportunity to understand the rest of the game. You throwing a tantrum because people aren't willing to immediately lynch him (and rip town apart in the process) is only making things worse. Even if we lynch Gentleman 5 today and he flips scum, if we do it in the way you want to do it, we majorly screw ourselves over because the only thing we've discussed since you've been overcome by this obsession is Gentleman 5. It's so counter-productive to town and this is the reason why lynching scum day 1 regularly ends in town loss. Relax. I haven't said what I'm reading Gentleman 5 and neither have a lot of other players and probably for pretty darn good reason.In post 2406, Gentleman 6 wrote:Like you guys are saying G5s been discussed to death but afaik no one besides me scumreads him still. Everyone is sitting here talking about how L8 is scum and L7 is calling that more productive discussion. It's not really a question if what's protown it's whether you guys agree with what's being discussed, and since no one agrees that G5 is scum trying to call him scum is getting pooh-poohed whereas the L8 is scum circlejerk which is for really questionable reasons even if she is scum is a universal read (who are her buddies exactly? Why aren't they trying to buoy up her slot if she's paired with obvtown) and no one stops to ask themselves what that says about what scum are doing in the game. Whereas if I'm right and G5 is scum it makes complete sense scum are trying to support the L8 scum narrative and shut down discussion of G5 since it can be reasonably assumed that after I'm dead no one scumreads G5 and he has a clean walk to endgame. Doesn't help no one engaged with my actual case on G5 and everyone engaged with reductive strawmen of my actual case.
What I'm saying is that I feel like you guys are thinking very one dimensionally about things and not really trying to understand how I feel or why I feel that way.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think it more has to do with the fact that if he's scum, he doesn't necessarily want a S-S pair.In post 2878, Gentleman 2 wrote:
What do you make of the fact that he jumped to pick someone he could have waited to pick? Was l5 in danger of being picked by g1 or 3, i forget who was supposed to go first?In post 2875, Gentleman 4 wrote:No one is made nervous by the fact that Gentleman 8 went out of order to choose Lady 5?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think every player has at least skimmed every page and is for the most part up to date on major events in the game, which I'm reminded time and time again that you are not.In post 2486, Lady 5 wrote:^ Reason why I dislike G4 saying I should go simply because I haven’t read “all” of the game.
It’s like he thinks everyone is reading the entire thing.
Sure some people might be but not everyone I don’t think.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
My process almost exactly. It's why he had to jump the order to pick Lady 5. That said, I've really enjoyed Lady 2's contributions thus far, and I won't accuse her further unless we have solid evidence via a Gentleman 8 scum flip.In post 2512, Lady 1 wrote:It’s interesting because if I was scum G8 and I had L2 partner scum, I pick me.
If I was scum G8 and only townies left, I never pick L5. I pick either L1 or L2.
Why would he pick L5? Maybe to keep L5 alive so she further ruins the little semblance of cohesion this town has? Possibly.
Maybe it is because this guarantees a strong townie dies. It’s probably a little of both.
A strong townie dies AND L5 continues to muck things up. That makes sense.
Plus maybe he saw that I would instaleave if he paired with me.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Right. Not SvS, but TvS. Lady 1 flipped town, shouldn't that make Lady 6 scum?In post 2664, Lady 5 wrote:Mhm I “felt”.
I’m not entirely sure.
Then if you would have bothered to look into my later posts instead of trying to find posts to shade me with you’d realize that I also said that L1 and L6 is never SvS.
As that was the conclusion I ended up with.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Ladies 2, 7, and 5 would you list the pairs in the game in order of most optimal to least optimal lynch, please?
@Lady 2, I do want to say that while I think Gentleman 8's scum flip would somewhat implicate you, I'm individually town reading you and I'd really prefer if that comment didn't prevent you from discussing things with me.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Lady 5, the following two posts contradict each other, which is pretty par the course for you. Actually I'm almost certain that if you picked any single stance of yours this game I could find another post of yours that contradicts it without much difficulty.
Please stop posting for a while, watch the game, get a hold of yourself and know where you're coming from before you keep posting.
Spoiler:- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Hm. Do you think the reads on Gentleman 8 and Lady 5 are based on play that indicates positively that their alignment is such that nothing they can do in the future will revoke current scum reads on them? In fewer words: do you think Gentleman 8 and Lady 5 have no capability or potential to ever be an asset, and/or their play indicates with certainty beyond reasonable doubt that one of the two will flip red?In post 2909, Lady 2 wrote:
I was going to say basically fine? I think there's enough consensus that G8/L5 can't be allowed to stay in long term regardless, and talking G6 off the ledge is valuableIn post 2887, Gentleman 4 wrote:My follow-up question is rather difficult to phrase, but I'll do my best:
How comfortable do you feel with the game state right now with respect to a Gentleman 5 Lady 4 lynch?
but
L5 continues to insist on nuking everything in her path??? Like L8 saying that L5 needs to go NOW might be correct regardless of G6's attitude towards not lynching G5 now?
You mentioned Gentleman 8 and Lady 5 as being your priority lynch, but context implies the former statement was a typo and you intended to write Gentleman 5 and Lady 4, is this correct?
Also, while my previous questions are still valid based on the thoughts you indicate here, I fear you misunderstand my question, and for clarification - do you feel comfortable with day ending right now as long as the lynch target flips scum, regardless of who the lynch target is?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I understand, I somehow managed to miss that part of the setup, my bad.In post 2911, Lady 2 wrote:For G8 I think it is within the realm of the possible that he could become an asset, potentially, and that he very sincerely and innocently just didn't engage with anything pre-dance but has the capacity and willingness to contribute significantly now that we've entered the main phases of the game. I cannot completely rule it out, though at this juncture it seems unlikely. L5 is a different matter. I would like to be more charitable than I am, but it's really really hard for me to see L5 as a future asset to Town. It is very very easy to see her as a continual asset for scum even if she's Town. I do think G8 is at least as likely - probably more - tobescum-aligned than L5.
Yes, G5/L4 is (or was, at least) the priority lynch in my eyes, sorry about the typo.
The last question is pretty odd, or maybe I'm just misunderstanding it still? No I don't want Day to end right now I guess? Have I been thinking about things wrong? If we're timely we get two lynches before intermission, correct? I was under the impression that we could lynch G5/L4 and go on to lynch e.g. G8/L5 before intermission phase?
Would it be safe to say that you feel certain enough in your reads that you feel alright lynching Gentleman 5 and Lady 4 right now, then?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
That's actually... really interesting. How long have you been playing and across what sites?In post 2920, Lady 7 wrote:
Played over 209 games of mafia, more town than scum, but I can’t give you a number. I absolutely hate, detest, loathe drawing scum, but I usually do okay. Went on a two-year streak of winning every scum game I played across 6 sites sometime back though. Don’t know how I’d do today. Haven’t played mafia in over a year and haven’t drawn scum in two years. I still hate it. Drawing mafia is one of the worst forms of torture in mafia, and that’s misery usually shines through.In post 2919, Gentleman 4 wrote:How many times have you played scum before, Lady 7?
Probably more than you wanted to know, but.
Okay gotta go for realz.
I asked because I somewhat disagreed with you on your previous comment, but you obviously have the experience to be taken pretty seriously here so I'll weigh it appropriately.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4