Mafiascum.net

In post 195, Lady 4 wrote:Did you just complain that I had a read too early, and now I don't have enough reads for you?

I don't love Lady 3 either, I just didn't see any reason to mention it.

This isn't at all what I complained about.

I even had the exact same townread on Lady 5 that you did. What I had an issue with was how you presented that read to everyone, you took several posts to do it and never said anything about it.
I would have interpreted it in a townier way if you had either said you had a gut townread there or if you had said something with more substance, but I felt you gave a completely empty answer.

And regarding Lady 7, it's not the fact that it's your only scumread that's the problem it's that you're going after the person who called you out earlier.
The fact that I'm facing a ton of resistance on this scumread, a major part of it from the slot that I thought was second most likely to be scum, doesn't help my feelings on it either.

In post 199, Lady 9 wrote:

In post 196, Gentleman 2 wrote:Ok so, thoughts on holding a vote for which Lady to kill? An unofficial one.

It'll happen naturally enough through pairing. I think even if there's an unofficial vote there's probably gonna be some rogue gentleman who will extend a dance invitation to the voted lady.

You ruined my plan. Thanks.

In post 200, Gentleman 6 wrote:What I had an issue with was how you presented that read to everyone,

you took several posts to do it

and never said anything about it.

That's kinda the part I liked because I thought I could track her process. You think how it was drawn out was forced?

2c - G6 is barking up a dumb tree.

I like lady 9s avatar
Therefore lady 9 is town


Am I doing this right?

In post 200, Gentleman 6 wrote:

In post 195, Lady 4 wrote:Did you just complain that I had a read too early, and now I don't have enough reads for you?

I don't love Lady 3 either, I just didn't see any reason to mention it.

This isn't at all what I complained about.

I took the word "only" as being important. I guess it wasn't.

In post 200, Gentleman 6 wrote:I even had the exact same townread on Lady 5 that you did. What I had an issue with was how you presented that read to everyone, you took several posts to do it and never said anything about it.
I would have interpreted it in a townier way if you had either said you had a gut townread there or if you had said something with more substance, but I felt you gave a completely empty answer.

You can interpret it however you like. It doesn't seem like I'm going to be able to reach you right now anyway. It's not a great sign in my mind for this going well that you were also bothered by defensiveness, which I'm likely going to continue to do and which I feel is a poor excuse for a reason in general.

In post 200, Gentleman 6 wrote:And regarding Lady 7, it's not the fact that it's your only scumread that's the problem it's that you're going after the person who called you out earlier.
The fact that I'm facing a ton of resistance on this scumread, a major part of it from the slot that I thought was second most likely to be scum, doesn't help my feelings on it either.

I'm not trying to go after them. It's not really much of a scumread. I just don't think the consensus townreads she was getting at the start are justified, and I'm bothered by Lady 2's statement that she groups them in with Lady 9, who I feel is much townier.

I'm not sure this is "a ton of resistance."

I don't think that you need post by post progression on reads that you have before a game reaches page 9.

Regarding 203, fine. I'll go do something else.

In post 206, Gentleman 6 wrote:I don't think that you need post by post progression on reads that you have before a game reaches page 9.

Regarding 203, fine. I'll go do something else.

Stick around and have some drinks

I wouldn't care so much at this stage of the game but L9 is shaping up to be de facto town leader and she's townreading my early scumreads and that makes me sad.
I also think that the misrep on me to "having reads too early" is super, super scummy.

But I will go do other things.

In post 208, Gentleman 6 wrote:I wouldn't care so much at this stage of the game but L9 is shaping up to be de facto town leader and she's townreading my early scumreads and that makes me sad.
I also think that the misrep on me to "having reads too early" is super, super scummy.

But I will go do other things.

I’ll vote you townleader if that will put a smile on ur face bae

I'll happily admit that I was basically just trying to say "gut" in more words. I like to cite posts to encourage others to look at them and possibly arrive at the same conclusion.

I'm not a town leader type.

In post 211, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm not a town leader type.

Okay I’ll be town leader and u can be my assistant

In post 208, Gentleman 6 wrote:I also think that the misrep on me to "having reads too early" is super, super scummy.

This is what I get from 162.

In post 212, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 211, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm not a town leader type.

Okay I’ll be town leader and u can be my assistant

You shall be our fearsome, intimidating town leader.

All hail Gentleman four!

Also, I think that townreading Gentleman 2 just for the IC post is bad play. I don't think it's alignment indicative that they didn't check which player the IC was.

Lmao.

I do not like Lady 2.

I like Gent 6's thoughts here even if I partly disagree. He's gone against some of the consensus in a much stronger way than Lady 4 and he has specific reasons for his pushes. I feel like he has a less diplomatic/charismatic style in general and is going to garner scum reads just by nature of being grating--no offense meant here. But if you look closer I think he genuinely believes his reasoning, and I don't think it's all bad either. I do wish he wouldn't just drop it just because someone said he was barking up the wrong tree though, I'd rather have this than an echo chamber.

pedit:

In post 215, Gentleman 6 wrote:Also, I think that townreading Gentleman 2 just for the IC post is bad play. I don't think it's alignment indicative that they didn't check which player the IC was.

is this serious?

In post 214, Gentleman 6 wrote:

In post 212, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 211, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm not a town leader type.

Okay I’ll be town leader and u can be my assistant

You shall be our fearsome, intimidating town leader.

All hail Gentleman four!

My platform shall be:

Scum are bad.
Let’s get rid of them.


Vote gentlemen 4 for a brighter tomorrow, tomorrow

So game trajectory wise, how strong do people feel they are at reading in isolation? Because this is going to get stupid convoluted really fast due to the usernames. I think this is going to come down to whose reads do you trust, and who is their partner.

Having scum reads right now is kinda useless bc the Lynch is entirely outside your control, so try and townread instead. I don't give a rats who you scum read right now, I care about who you town read.

In post 220, Lady 9 wrote:VOTE: Gent 4

Thank you for your support citizen

In post 220, Lady 9 wrote:VOTE: Gent 4

Ya I agree

In post 220, Lady 9 wrote:VOTE: Gent 4

Lady 9, who do you townread?

First order of business:

I am buying this town a pizza!!!!


What you want on your pizza?
If any of you say anchovies you might as well claim scum now