Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:03 am**

I find it weird that people are looking for excuses to TR me tbh

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:10 am**

In post 200, Menalque wrote:I find it weird that people are looking for excuses to TR me tbh

Towny paranoia

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:13 am**

I think there’s scum in (sally, GL)

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:14 am**

We can go for this first VOTE: GL

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:18 am**

In post 182, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 62, Menalque wrote:
In post 60, Amrun wrote:
In post 58, Menalque wrote:@GL do you think 35 was genuine?
Why ask this of GL in particular?
Ask me this again later
Can you answer this yet?

Yes, I wanted to know if he voted dats in 38 for memes or not

I don’t think dats’ thing about there being 3 scum was AI any more than I think me listing 2 scum is AI for me

The fact that he used it to justify a semi serious vote is opportunistic

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:20 am**

In post 106, GuiltyLion wrote:
In post 45, Pretentious wrote:
In post 42, GuiltyLion wrote:I think we played one game together where I nailed you as scum on your replace-in, but then you successfully argued your way out of it to the point where I townread you and then lost as a result. No love lost at all though, you played well
Was this Let’s Talk About An On-Going game?
nah it was Charging Up

In post 58, Menalque wrote:@GL do you think 35 was genuine?
I thought it was presented in a joking manner (and Salamence has since said it was RVS/joke) but personally
I viewed it as something that's worth a non-RVS vote and I was kinda hoping Salamence felt the same
. I think if you genuinely forgot when posting that there were 3 scum then that's a townslip and Datisi pointing it out yet without any thought to your alignment feels like something scum might do.

Also thought this was super noncommittal and I also think GL would be quite likely to want me to TR him after nomination mafia

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:23 am**

I kind of think that opportunistic votes on page 2, even if serious, are not scum indicative.

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:28 am**

Okay, why?

Like if he’d just blown it off as wanting to generate pressure I’d prob handwave it

It’s the combination of it “being worth a non-RVS vote” but not really going beyond that that makes the opportunism seem scummy to me

Like wanting to be seen to do something beyond RVS

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:32 am**

In post 179, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 95, Menalque wrote:
In post 90, Salamence20 wrote:Seems like a honest read, and I was waiting for something serious to happen. I like quick RVS.
I thought it was p obviously a joke tho
I didn't tho

Do you mean creature’s SR in you or your original post?

Bc when I said I thought it was p obviously a joke I was talking about your vote in dats

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:32 am**

maybe i'm not seeing it from the perspective of someone who thinks he's being buddied, but GL's iso looks sound to me

unvoting my rvs

UNVOTE: GL

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:34 am**

Opportunism is voting someone for a weak reason. For a player looking to vote in the very early game, they have no reasons but weak reasons, regardless of alignment. So if it's GL's nature to try to get a serious vote down asap, then it's completely expected for him to jump on the first scrap of content he can find.

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:35 am**

In post 207, Menalque wrote:It’s the combination of it “being worth a non-RVS vote” but not really going beyond that that makes the opportunism seem scummy to me

What do you mean "not really going beyond that"?

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:37 am**

In post 202, Menalque wrote:I think there’s scum in (sally, GL)

I think youre wrong on both cases.

Id love to hear why Im scum though, did you find something in masquerade that caught your attention? Why ask for that game anyways?

Menalque wrote:
In post 179, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 95, Menalque wrote:
In post 90, Salamence20 wrote:Seems like a honest read, and I was waiting for something serious to happen. I like quick RVS.
I thought it was p obviously a joke tho
I didn't tho
Do you mean creature’s SR in you or your original post?

Bc when I said I thought it was p obviously a joke I was talking about your vote in dats

Oh ok, I thought we were talking about creature.

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:43 am**

In post 210, Something_Smart wrote:Opportunism is voting someone for a weak reason. For a player looking to vote in the very early game, they have no reasons but weak reasons, regardless of alignment. So if it's GL's nature to try to get a serious vote down asap, then it's completely expected for him to jump on the first scrap of content he can find.

Okay so then why not say that when asked about it?

In post 211, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 207, Menalque wrote:It’s the combination of it “being worth a non-RVS vote” but not really going beyond that that makes the opportunism seem scummy to me
What do you mean "not really going beyond that"?

Like being non-RVS implies to me that he thought there was something genuinely scummy about dats’ thing but I don’t think he’s followed that up

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:44 am**

@sally can you tell me if you’ve played with icon much before I answer you?

I asked about perfect masq bc it’s a recent large theme you’ve played in, I haven’t had the time to meta you yet

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:45 am**

Tbf i also have less faith now than I used to in sorting through meta if it’s not meta I have personally with people

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:49 am**

In post 213, Menalque wrote:Okay so then why not say that when asked about it?

What do you call 121?

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:50 am**

In post 215, Menalque wrote:Tbf i also have less faith now than I used to in sorting through meta if it’s not meta I have personally with people

Good call. Secondhand meta is a real nasty can of worms.

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:50 am**

Never heard of icon before this game

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:52 am**

In post 213, Menalque wrote:Like being non-RVS implies to me that he thought there was something genuinely scummy about dats’ thing but I don’t think he’s followed that up

118, 135, 144 are following it up, no?

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 4:54 am**

In post 216, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 213, Menalque wrote:Okay so then why not say that when asked about it?
What do you call 121?

Yeah you might be right but more bc of 118 actually

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 5:00 am**

In post 135, GuiltyLion wrote:
In post 132, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 106, GuiltyLion wrote:I thought it was presented in a joking manner (and Salamence has since said it was RVS/joke) but personally I viewed it as something that's worth a non-RVS vote and I was kinda hoping Salamence felt the same. I think if you genuinely forgot when posting that there were 3 scum then that's a townslip and Datisi pointing it out yet without any thought to your alignment feels like something scum might do.
I mean town can easily look at the OP and see how many scum there are.

I also find it weird that you read Salamence's vote as joking yet read the banter between Menal/Datisi as serious.
I didn't read the banter as serious - what makes you say that I did? You can be joking and still mess up how many scum there are. If anything
part of the reason I was pinged by Datisi is
because
she wasn't more serious
.

Yo GL talk to me about this

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 5:03 am**

In post 218, Salamence20 wrote:Never heard of icon before this game

Hmm, okay

The reason is that icon is generally v mislynch baity and so pushing him early tends to ping me if it’s from someone who knows him who should know that him being scummy doesn’t necessarily mean he’s scum

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 5:21 am**

salamance, ignorant = scum

y/n?

Posted: **Wed Dec 04, 2019 5:24 am**

In post 222, Menalque wrote:him being scummy doesn’t necessarily mean he’s scum

I mean this is true of everyone lol.

Mafiascum.net

Guns & Roses III [Game over]