Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:45 am**

Official Vote Count 1.06With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Lynching

Datisi

(2): emps, Menalque

Alduskkel

(2): AaronFrost, Iconeum

Iconeum

(2): HH, Alduskkel

Menalque

(1): Look At Me Im So Town

AaronFrost

(1): Chemist1422

emps

(1): Uncrowned

Not Voting

(0):

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-12-31 18:00:00).

Mod notes:

It takes 10 votes to lynch the Moderator.
emps has (expired on 2019-12-24 05:52:18) to post before I start looking for a replacement.
Iconeum V/LA 25-26/12.
Iconeum standing V/LA weekends.

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:45 am**

Also

Yoink

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:45 am**

FUCKING FUCK

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:51 am**

This Ico/HH interaction, bleh. I don't really care for it.

Ico had a pretty shallow reason for TLing me and SLing HH - nothing out of the ordinary. Early game stuff.

HH's reaction was a bit much for my liking, but I doubt it's AI. Too much of a gamble to call it one way or the other yet for me.

I've had a decent run recently of picking out scummy openers (2 for 2 in my last 2 games), albeit from the exact same person. I'm gonna be confident in this one.

Emps, buddy. Come out and play.

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:53 am**

By same person, I didn't mean Emps. I meant the openers came from the same guy in both games.

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:55 am**

Mena, put your vote on someone that isn't the moderator.

I'd ask Emps to do the same but they're scum, so I'm not bothering.

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:03 am**

Power to the people, overthrow moderation

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:10 am**

In post 159, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: aldus

scum thinks it jumped on an easy wagon

Do you believe this?

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:14 am**

Okay, I'm going to bite.

Mena, I don't think you're being particularly helpful with your lines of questioning. I think they're potentially causing paranoia and won't lead to accurate answers that are gonna help town win this game.

That's my two cents. Do with it what you will. Maybe you've got a strategy here, but I'm not seeing it just yet.

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:16 am**

In post 207, Uncrowned wrote:
In post 159, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: aldus

scum thinks it jumped on an easy wagon
Do you believe this?

i think it's possible

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:20 am**

In post 208, Uncrowned wrote:Okay, I'm going to bite.

Mena,
I don't think you're being particularly helpful with your lines of questioning. I think they're potentially causing paranoia and won't lead to accurate answers that are gonna help town win this game.

That's my two cents. Do with it what you will. Maybe you've got a strategy here, but I'm not seeing it just yet.

Why

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:26 am**

In post 81, Menalque wrote:you don't think the blank vote for emps was suspicious

not really no

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:26 am**

In post 170, Menalque wrote:I don’t think I have

What do you think my read is on you atm?

In post 173, Menalque wrote:What if I’m TRing you

In post 174, Menalque wrote:And why does scum!me need to gambit here when I could just push you outright

In post 180, Menalque wrote:
In post 175, Iconeum wrote:
In post 173, Menalque wrote:What if I’m TRing you
it's possible

but it felt like you were trying to corner me
Why do you think I would try to corner you as either alignment?

In post 181, Menalque wrote:As in what is the benefit to my win condition as either alignment

In post 198, Menalque wrote:What about why I’d do it as town?

In post 199, Menalque wrote:And again, why does scum!me try to push you in that way specifically?

Feels like you're dancing around and trying to look like you're doing something. I think it would've been much more useful for you to actually have a say on the HH/Ico engagement, and even the Aldus vote on Ico.

Only played one game with you so the meta here is super limited but you were a lot more direct last time.

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:26 am**

In post 103, Menalque wrote:come here chemist

In post 104, Menalque wrote:I see you

oops

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:28 am**

I liked Ico’s page 5 posts and agreed with his Uncrowned read

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:30 am**

In post 155, Menalque wrote:VOTE: datisi

VOTE: Datisi

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:32 am**

In post 182, Menalque wrote:I need emps, Chem, and uncrowned to play more

I’m pretty sure getting the new Pokemon game isn’t grounds for V/LA but

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:32 am**

In post 215, Chemist1422 wrote:
In post 155, Menalque wrote:VOTE: datisi
VOTE: Datisi

#goodposting

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:33 am**

I just never wanna lynch Chem he’s always too precious to be lynched

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:39 am**

In post 218, Menalque wrote:I just never wanna lynch Chem he’s always too precious to be lynched

<3

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:48 am**

Need some more from emps and I think I may be ready to solve

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:57 am**

ur amazing

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 3:04 am**

oof I know

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 3:09 am**

In post 119, JJJ wrote:
In post 118, Iconeum wrote:
In post 112, JJJ wrote:Like damn. Everyone is in here joking around and multiple people have been less productive than our slot and Iconeum shitpushes us on some terrible/fake logic.

That doesn't sit right with me.

-X
Let's assume you're right, that theres other less productive slots than you. If so, why is it scum indicative for Icon to push you. IIRC, you dont have any votes on you yet. So hes leading the wagon on you at the moment? What's the scum motivation there?

BP

no, i'm voting you because i have a feeling that your entire rvs phase so far feels ungenuine

do you have a problem with that?
yeah. It's a load of BS. There's no way you genuinely feel that way about our slot over others.

-X

Posted: **Mon Dec 23, 2019 3:12 am**

In post 124, Iconeum wrote:
In post 114, JJJ wrote:
In post 106, Iconeum wrote:
In post 101, Uncrowned wrote:It's not a random vote, so yeah.

I dislike the lack of commital to an actual vote. Emps jumped on the meme without actually doing anything.

In post 105, Uncrowned wrote:Because scum would rather be non-commital and not get involved in having to come up with BS explanations for their actions. If they're scum, this gives Emps an easy start to the game so they can read and react later on.

Too bad I called it out.
i like this thinking for town
This is literally why I asked emps to make a real vote. Even though you didn't know that, I was pushing the slot to do something, which was blatantly obvious, and you pick us out of the bunch for "not doing anything" to paraphrase.
There's a huge difference in how Uncrowned reads here, as opposed to your 'emps real vote plz'

one reads genuine, the other, well, not

What do you mean by it doesnt read genuine? I'm a little more concerned that HH is now trying to take credit for a push/prod of Emps, w/o voting him, while Uncrowned at least committed to voting him. Even the naked vote he explained as a kind of reaction test.

Mafiascum.net

Micro 909: 09:12 (Game Over!)