Mafiascum.net

given the season i'm not sure i'm giving super much credence to lurking rn

in a few days maybe

So why is nobody calling out wake88?

In post 199, skitter30 wrote:

In post 194, popsofctown wrote:You didn't look like you were sorting BBMolla at all. You were trumpeting about how correct or incorrect it is to "lock" a vote, which doesn't lead to understanding why they did that and sorting them. You look more interested in vindication than ascertaining who is scum or town.

i don't understand how this shows that 68 looks like bob knows that bbmolla is town

If he didn't know BBMolla's alignment he'd need to know whether BBMolla can produce ostensibly town reasoning or can only produce swiss cheese reasoning as the "why", and that dichotomy would provide information on BBMolla's alignment.

Since he already knows BBMolla's alignment this is unnecessary and his time is better served making sure BBMolla's vote itself is viewed as wrongful and doesn't pick up steam and lynch bob (which is disproportionately important to a scum!bob)

Are people aware that bob called out bbmola on page 3? At this point he couldn't predict that bbmola is going to be a lurker. That is kind of derailling this though.

Kerset you can derail me whenever you want

I'm reading

"SO there must be some reason behind it?" (From 68)

As "please tell me your reason"

Because the ? Tells me that bob wants to find out more

So I disagree with your apparent scum read on bob

Fun fact: at the top of this particular page bob made a blank vote.

In post 205, profii wrote:I'm reading

"SO there must be some reason behind it?" (From 68)

As "please tell me your reason"

Because the ? Tells me that bob wants to find out more

So I disagree with your apparent scum read on bob

Potentially in my defense, post 68 is pretty poorly written and incoherent. I can't firmly go "that's definitely not what he was doing at all" because the amalgamation of English words is such a poor semblance of communication. But that's definitely not what I think he was doing imho.
HOLISTICALLY
Ok I'm almost positive that's not what holistically means and retract its use.
I am going to master this word before the end of this game I swear.

In post 202, popsofctown wrote:

In post 199, skitter30 wrote:

In post 194, popsofctown wrote:You didn't look like you were sorting BBMolla at all. You were trumpeting about how correct or incorrect it is to "lock" a vote, which doesn't lead to understanding why they did that and sorting them. You look more interested in vindication than ascertaining who is scum or town.

i don't understand how this shows that 68 looks like bob knows that bbmolla is town

If he didn't know BBMolla's alignment he'd need to know whether BBMolla can produce ostensibly town reasoning or can only produce swiss cheese reasoning as the "why", and that dichotomy would provide information on BBMolla's alignment.

Since he already knows BBMolla's alignment this is unnecessary and his time is better served making sure BBMolla's vote itself is viewed as wrongful and doesn't pick up steam and lynch bob (which is disproportionately important to a scum!bob)

i can see your reasoning if i squint, i guess

i don't think what you're describing here is indicative of bob knowing that bbmolla is town. i think it's indicative of "bob voting bbmolla before he knew/understood what bbmolla meant by 'locked' here"

In post 203, Kerset wrote:Are people aware that bob called out bbmola on page 3? At this point he couldn't predict that bbmola is going to be a lurker. That is kind of derailling this though.

also scummy ^

Another fun fact: bob says that he takes second votes as 'serious one' meantime this page 3 vote was blank and his second.

In post 207, popsofctown wrote:Potentially in my defense, post 68 is pretty poorly written and incoherent. I can't firmly go "that's definitely not what he was doing at all" because the amalgamation of English words is such a poor semblance of communication. But that's definitely not what I think he was doing imho.

reading/understanding bob's posts is not always easy, i agree
but i read it the way profii did

can i interest anyone in voting kerset with me?

I can't take credibility in statements that bob
- took bbmola claim seriously
- hate blank votes
- finds second votes out of rvs

Because
- also blank voted nearby
- as second vote
- on page 3
And finnaly he is only going against people, who voted him
Skitter, turkey, me
His applications are not towards everyone. As I checked he noticed me as soon as I voted him.

In post 213, skitter30 wrote:can i interest anyone in voting kerset with me?

Yes. I'm assuming we are thinking the same thing right now

The conclusion is that he is afraid of being voted.

In post 214, Kerset wrote:I can't take credibility in statements that bob
- took bbmola claim seriously
- hate blank votes
- finds second votes out of rvs

Because
- also blank voted nearby
- as second vote
- on page 3
And finnaly he is only going against people, who voted him
Skitter, turkey, me
His applications are not towards everyone. As I checked he noticed me as soon as I voted him.

You have omitted some vital context

Bob states twice his blank joke was not serious

He also says due to the "locked" comment that he is querying the bbmolla blank vote as he takes "locked" to mean the vote was serious

If you don't make serious votes then I don't see credibility in believing that such silly votes are serious.

That's the point

I lean town on Kerset's behavior so far but I'm not positive about it.
Ke seems to be trying to cause people to react in a readable way although I can see how ker points aren't hitting home or anything and that can be scum indicative

In post 220, popsofctown wrote:I lean town on Kerset's behavior so far but I'm not positive about it.
Ke seems to be trying to cause people to react in a readable way although I can see how ker points aren't hitting home or anything and that can be scum indicative

It seems oddly aggressive.

Also, I just dropped my laptop.

I don't view even maximal aggression as scummy, holistically, but if you have some detail maybe you could show it's scummy in this case.


WAS THAT RIGHT?!?!