Mafiascum.net

Helped with what?

In post 199, We are not helping wrote:Where's my recognition? I helped.

At least your implied reasoning (that sheeping Mastina is scummy) makes some sense, although I was going to still ask why.

Calling our ISO "terrible" is a meh attack.
Also 193 is terrible

I’m actually townreading Knighted Cakeboy

Based on?

In post 198, Trojan Horses wrote:My slot's ISO terrible: yes
Scummy: how?

In post 186, SirCakez wrote:

In post 184, gobbledygook wrote:What is terrible about the iso? And why is Elmo scum?

Just buddying no scumhunting

In post 200, gobbledygook wrote:Helped with what?

we're not pardoning you for thanksgiving anymore

Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 199, We are not helping wrote:Where's my recognition? I helped.

At least your implied reasoning (that sheeping Mastina is scummy) makes some sense, although I was going to still ask why.

b/c why would u sheep mastina ever? That's asking for town to lose aka scum win con.

In post 201, Trojan Horses wrote: Calling our ISO "terrible" is a meh attack.

Also 193 is terrible

the hypocrisy!!

In post 205, We are not helping wrote:b/c why would u sheep mastina ever? That's asking for town to lose aka scum win con.

I respect Mastina, and I agree with her explanations for reads. Which reads of hers do disagree with and additionally think she has bad reasons for?

SirCakez wrote: Just buddying no scumhunting

[/quote]
I saw. And scumreading someone intentionally, blatantly doing this for this at this stage of the game is level-0 scumhunting.

Whale then I'm at level-0

Just terrible

In post 207, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 205, We are not helping wrote:b/c why would u sheep mastina ever? That's asking for town to lose aka scum win con.

I respect Mastina, and I agree with her explanations for reads. Which reads of hers do

you

disagree with and additionally think she has bad reasons for?

I dunno man like when you come out in page 2 with a reads list with half of those players haven't even posted, that's not someone you want to sheep.

Oooh Trojan horses is a smarmy little horse :p

In post 205, We are not helping wrote:we're not pardoning you for thanksgiving anymore

A 7month lease on life ain’t so bad

Why did you townread me earlier

In post 166, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 165, BBmolla wrote:RC Mastina pulled the whole “I read the rules so I know this thing about scum” and 9/10 it comes from scum trying to get Town cred

This is a general read and not specific to Mastina meta, correct?

Si

In post 203, Trojan Horses wrote:Based on?

Earnestly scumhunting

In post 210, We are not helping wrote:

In post 207, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 205, We are not helping wrote:b/c why would u sheep mastina ever? That's asking for town to lose aka scum win con.

I respect Mastina, and I agree with her explanations for reads. Which reads of hers do

you

disagree with and additionally think she has bad reasons for?

I dunno man like when you come out in page 2 with a reads list with half of those players haven't even posted, that's not someone you want to sheep.

bwahahaha I can respect this

In post 212, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 205, We are not helping wrote:we're not pardoning you for thanksgiving anymore

A 7month lease on life ain’t so bad

Why did you townread me earlier

calling RC town on page 2/3 is ballsy

It’s easier for everyone involved. He’ll kill a scum day1, get killed by scum N1, and everyone is happy

In post 210, We are not helping wrote:I dunno man like when you come out in page 2 with a reads list with half of those players haven't even posted, that's not someone you want to sheep.

Do you believe it's possible to form early reads based on introductions and initial posts?
If so, what's the problem with collating them into a list?
Why assume said reads will not evolve with the game?
If it's only that you dislike her making a list page 2 and nothing about the reads themselves... boo.

gobbledygook wrote:

In post 203, Trojan Horses wrote:Based on?

Earnestly scumhunting

And why is it more likely town than scum faking it?
Please quote one read of theirs that carries any depth in reasoning.
I'll wait.

Depth of reasoning isn’t the reason why I townread him
He’s like the first true scum hunter in the game I don’t think scum ever tried to be first true scum hunter when you have people like Mastina and RC and multi headed hydrae waiting to pounce

"Scum are likelier to not understand jokes/irony from town"
What do you guys make of this statement?

I love this gobbles

In post 219, gobbledygook wrote:Depth of reasoning isn’t the reason why I townread him
He’s like the first true scum hunter in the game I don’t think scum ever tried to be first true scum hunter when you have people like Mastina and RC and multi headed hydrae waiting to pounce

So what do scum do instead when you have people like Mastina or RC and other multi-head hydrae waiting to pounce upon them?

In post 221, BBmolla wrote:I love this gobbles

BB<3

In post 222, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 219, gobbledygook wrote:Depth of reasoning isn’t the reason why I townread him
He’s like the first true scum hunter in the game I don’t think scum ever tried to be first true scum hunter when you have people like Mastina and RC and multi headed hydrae waiting to pounce

So what do scum do instead when you have people like Mastina or RC and other multi-head hydrae waiting to pounce upon them?

Wait for them to pounce on one another or a weak townie and then get Involved