Mafiascum.net

In post 199, Green Crayons wrote:I mean. I get the vote being RVS

But then you justify it with it being in some way bc of his reaction to Isis, which is not RVS

Do you see the disconnect?

oh i see the confusion. i didnt mean that my post was in response to his thoughts on isis. i just meant that in a way, isis created the situation that led to my vote. she created the inorganic way of doing RVS, and that resulted in human suggesting an organic way of doing it, and that led to me making a comment on organics. i was shitposting again. like i said, im gonna shitpost for a while until i get reads on people. dont mind me in the meantime. ill give useful meaningful content later, including later on today. if you wanna SR me for that its fine. I'm just saying give me until its time to pick a lynch to contribute. Right now we are evaluating based on shitposts, and without more context i think its hard to get accurate reads. maybe im just bad, but thats where im at.

i dont buy this.

i don't mind if votato is our first lynch today.

Target	Wagon
Cycle Men (3)	Firebringer (122), NorwegianboyEE (155), Isis (189)
NorwegianboyEE (2)	Alisae (134), Green Crayons (178)
Firebringer (2)	votato (88), Cycle Men (152)
humaneatingmonkey (2)	Elements (22), Looker (153)
Isis (1)	Deimos27 (13)
Elements (1)	Albert B. Rampage (9)
votato (1)	humaneatingmonkey (105)
Not Voting (0)

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. The Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-08 06:42:59).

In post 201, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i dont buy this.

i don't mind if votato is our first lynch today.

what exactly is the "this" that you dont buy? you think im playing some 4-d chess where each of my posts surface level is a shitpost but deep down inside is actually a scumpost designed to mislead?

votato your nihilistic attitude towards the possibility of generating valuable early content seems more like a defensive kludge than a worldview you feel driven to share

ohh good I don't need to change my vote.

In post 189, Isis wrote:VOTE: Cycle men because Norweescum is likely to reveal all of his teammates and write me poetry

It don’t come so cheap no more. Besides. It’s not like that worked out so well in Fusion mafia. Pocket attempts on you are out of the picture from now on. I know it’s sad for you, but after all... you can only blame yourself. If you had been obediently pocketed i’d let you live on in that sweet sweet blissfull ignorance.

Look at Cycle men’s ISO. LOOK AT IT.
If that slot is town then i can safely say gg. We lost.

Come on I let you live for like 4 extra dayphases I think that was pretty good repayment

Actually, you were one of the main reasons i was close to having a mental breakdown. All those times you unnecesarilly placed an extra vote on me made me want to break out in tears and confess that i’d been a very bad scum player and deserved punishment.

In post 207, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Look at Cycle men’s ISO. LOOK AT IT.
If that slot is town then i can safely say gg. We lost.

Look at ABR's ISO. LOOK AT IT.
If that slot is town then i can safely say gg. We lost.

In post 210, Alisae wrote:

In post 207, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Look at Cycle men’s ISO. LOOK AT IT.
If that slot is town then i can safely say gg. We lost.

Look at ABR's ISO. LOOK AT IT.
If that slot is town then i can safely say gg. We lost.

I disagree. ABR could be excused by inactivity due to being busy IRL. Meanwhile Cycle men has consistently posted garbage. Showing that they had the potential to make good posts, but did not.

i was making a joke

In post 211, NorwegianboyEE wrote:ABR could be excused by inactivity due to being busy IRL.

He's inactive because he's busy irl?

In post 213, Alisae wrote:

In post 211, NorwegianboyEE wrote:ABR could be excused by inactivity due to being busy IRL.

He's inactive because he's busy irl?

Idk, but the fact that he hasn't posted anything here since his first post suggests it's an possibility.

In post 182, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Cycle Man

>joins the game, but not really

im sorry did you expect me to have the game solved in half an hour on page 2?
how hard are you gonna try and force this?

i find it concerning that something this flimsy is one of your two condemning pieces of evidence against me

In post 215, Cycle Men wrote:

In post 182, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Cycle Man

>joins the game, but not really

im sorry did you expect me to have the game solved in half an hour on page 2?
how hard are you gonna try and force this?

Bruh, your defense would look a lot better if you had posted anything at all that would advance the game prior to this.

im not the type of person who feels like pretending that you can form any type of read off 100-200 posts in a 12 player game

In post 218, Cycle Men wrote:im not the type of person who feels like pretending that you can form any type of read off 100-200 posts in a 12 player game

Well a bunch of people have got reads already. Why haven't you?

keyword: pretending

In post 220, Cycle Men wrote:keyword: pretending

So who are the ones pretending according to you?

i think you misunderstand what i mean

You don't have reads, got it.

you see i have a tough time answering because the question comes at an off-topic angle that's irrelevant to the discussion at hand and disjoints the point i'm trying to make
i do have the starts of a few reads, but i dont think it possible to have a read list that isnt to some extent forced for the sake of looking active 150 posts in