Mafiascum.net

In post 193, inutile wrote:i was trying to determine how reasonable my scumread due to past experience of both believing too strongly and not strongly enough in reads that felt very similar to me based on feedback and further interactions and now i see no need to put holdengolden at L-1 right now. do you simply want him to claim?

no i simply want to wagon him. which your vote should be contributing in.

go vote HG.

I want to dayvig popo.

voting porkens and then immediately back to me, flailing already u hate to see it

In post 192, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 187, Exemplar wrote:Yeah, this is a tunnel.

LOL JUST BECAUSE I THINK YOUR SCUM AND IM PUSHING YOU DOESNT MAKE IT A TUNNEL YOU CANT JUST WRITE OFF ACCUSATIONS BY SAYING ITS A TUNNEL. LETS SEE WHERE WE ARE ON DAY 3 IF U WANNA CALL IT A TUNNEL THEN THEN OK.

this is so scummy the way u r depicting my push on you as a tunnel

*you're

In post 200, humaneatingmonkey wrote:no i simply want to wagon him. which your vote should be contributing in.

go vote HG.

so you want me to vote holdengolden to L-1 in order to simply say there was a wagon? but you don't want him to claim at that point?

and you also don't want him lynched right now?

In post 203, Exemplar wrote:

In post 192, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 187, Exemplar wrote:Yeah, this is a tunnel.

LOL JUST BECAUSE I THINK YOUR SCUM AND IM PUSHING YOU DOESNT MAKE IT A TUNNEL YOU CANT JUST WRITE OFF ACCUSATIONS BY SAYING ITS A TUNNEL. LETS SEE WHERE WE ARE ON DAY 3 IF U WANNA CALL IT A TUNNEL THEN THEN OK.

this is so scummy the way u r depicting my push on you as a tunnel

*you're

lol what part of my posting style makes you think i give a flying FUCK about apostrophes???

This isn't natural. This is picking a target and then painting everything they do as scummy. That "case" is trash and if you continue to call it valid after I've told you half the stuff were jokes, or not addressing how asking someone why they scumread me is "over defensive", you're scum.

these are good points from inutile, im watching closely

206 is fake. You guys buying this false bravado?

In post 204, inutile wrote:

In post 200, humaneatingmonkey wrote:no i simply want to wagon him. which your vote should be contributing in.

go vote HG.

so you want me to vote holdengolden to L-1 in order to simply say there was a wagon? but you don't want him to claim at that point?

Claims only happen when there's intent to hammer. I want a wagon to force spotlight on two candidates and watch how people interact with it.

WHY are you still not voting HG?

In post 210, humaneatingmonkey wrote:WHY are you still not voting HG?

because i don't want to put him to L-1 as i don't want him to claim right now and i also don't want him to be lynched right now, which i've already more or less spelled out.

In post 207, Exemplar wrote:This isn't natural. This is picking a target and then painting everything they do as scummy. That "case" is trash and if you continue to call it valid after I've told you half the stuff were jokes, or not addressing how asking someone why they scumread me is "over defensive", you're scum.

the case is good

In post 192, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 187, Exemplar wrote:Yeah, this is a tunnel.

LOL JUST BECAUSE I THINK YOUR SCUM AND IM PUSHING YOU DOESNT MAKE IT A TUNNEL YOU CANT JUST WRITE OFF ACCUSATIONS BY SAYING ITS A TUNNEL. LETS SEE WHERE WE ARE ON DAY 3 IF U WANNA CALL IT A TUNNEL THEN THEN OK.

this is so scummy the way u r depicting my push on you as a tunnel

This post annoys me beyond reason.

as it should i bet it sucks being caught before page 10 LOL

In post 211, inutile wrote:because i don't want to put him to L-1 as i don't want him to claim right now and i also don't want him to be lynched right now, which i've already more or less spelled out.

is he at L-1? is there intent to hammer? are we in a gamestate where a lynch would realistically happen? why are you so soft on your scumread? are you really scumreading him?

im going to bed

That post btw is right out of his scumgame:

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11805642

In post 216, popopopopopopo wrote:im going to bed

I'm gonna get you lynched before you wake up.

In post 215, humaneatingmonkey wrote:is he at L-1? is there intent to hammer? are we in a gamestate where a lynch would realistically happen? why are you so soft on your scumread? are you really scumreading him?

he is at L-2. my vote would put him to L-1, at which point it would not be unreasonable for him to claim and it is also possible he would be lynched. i am 'soft' on my scumread to the extent that my putting additional pressure on him in the form of my vote seems more a net negative than a net positive at this point in the game. why is my vote necessary? what purpose does it serve for you?

Meh, I might be tunneling too. It's irritating for sure, but I should take a break and come back later.

In post 219, inutile wrote:why is my vote necessary? what purpose does it serve for you?

also, what do you think my not voting means?

In post 217, Exemplar wrote:That post btw is right out of his scumgame:

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11805642

I go all caps in my town games too ALL CAP IS NOT ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE

In post 222, popopopopopopo wrote:I go all caps in my town games too ALL CAP IS NOT ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11782605

Yeah, it's just age-indicative I guess.