Dunn's no longer on the table for you?In post 1282, Not_Mafia wrote:Scratchings and Maris are the only valid votes for the rest of today
Mini Normal 2148 (Post Game)
Forum rules
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
What do you think of farside's case on mala?In post 1177, notscience wrote:Farside I’m prettty sure she was right that I used to do it all the time and I actually want to try to work with her this game as evidenced in my iso so I didn’t wanna be brainlessly tunneling all game so I took a step back
Spoiler: farside's mala thoughts"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
apparently you can't double the spoiler.
so here's farside's post without my additional spoilers:
In post 1160, farside22 wrote:this was in my spoiler text.
So above is some quotes from Mala where she calls out notty, has a few town pings but never in any post did she call notty town, but gave her vote to him.
In a few post she says she town read both GC and BM back and forth but out of the blue and for no reason found she joined the BM wagon.
She's had very little follow through with her reads or reasoning on why she finds a player scum. That' s why I call it surface level scum hunting"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Okay, that was a reread (where I skipped ~15 pages in the 20s/30s).
I just want to see Porkens' answers to my Post 1254 Qs, and then I'll vote someone."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Okay. I think you're scum.In post 1320, Porkens wrote:Finally home from work and post office.
Thank you for the extra time all. In response to this:
In post 1254, Green Crayons wrote:<snip...>
Did you actually say why Dunn is worth your vote here? I don’t think so.
Also tell me more about these “clear associatives” that would come with a Dunn flip.
Dunn’s got averygood chance of flipping scum, and everyone has shared reads of him one way or the other, including a small group of defenders. That will tell us a lot.
I have a solid townread on HK and Dunn’s vote there is a safe non-starter, which I think he knows. His vote’s there, but he isn’t doing anything to make it happen, I’m guessing because he doesn’t really want to present an alternative to my mislynch, which seemed pretty certain after clidd ghosted.
Dunn’s commentary in 822 also rubs me the wrong way. He’s casting shade on GC (and tato) without actually challenging him. (I also TR GC. I can understand the scum read on BM, and even though it's wrong I read GC as scum hunting and the votes there really don't make much sense to me.)
Finally, he’s been active lurking and trolling all day.
-----
I'd be ok lynching votato, but it really won't tell us as much as Dunn.
I commend the pivot to hard reading me as town. I instinctively don't want to lynch someone who does that.
But I don't think this Dunn suspicion is natural. Dunn was tied for the second bw (with me, who also had 2 votes), and I think you decided to try to push and focus on Dunn because he already had some votes and he hasn't nearly been a pain in the ass like I have. I say that because I don't think your suspicions are legitimate.
For starters, you didn't give suspicions originally for your Dunn vote.
And now it comes down:
- to pushing a non-starter wagon on HK--but it's no more of a nonstarter than farside trying to vote GC, as stun is happy with both a HK and GC vote but nobody else is
- picking one post (that conveniently defends me) with an okay theory, but would need some plenty more work to be a banner case
- uses buzzwords "active lurking and trolling," neither of which I think are accurate; he hasn't beetlejuiced and he isn't a troll player
I'm also not convinced that Dunn gives us great associative tells any more than other players who have been the thread's topic of conversation. You're pretty nonspecific on that point, which I admit is generally NAI, but I would think that if this was legitimate point you would have *some* specific examples in mind.
VOTE: Porkens"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I thought that was gerain you called out for that?In post 1348, notscience wrote:
Yes Dunn has I called him on it lolIn post 1339, Green Crayons wrote:he hasn't beetlejuiced"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I'm saying your suspicions of Dunn (voting HK as a vanity cw) are equally applicable to farside (voting GC as a vanity cw).In post 1368, Porkens wrote:This is (was) farside’s town game and you are trying to compare her to Dunn. These pieces don’t go together.
I'm not making the point to say you should read farside as scum.
I'm making the point because--as you read farside as town--it suggests your suspicion of Dunn on this basis manufactured rather than legitimate."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I stand corrected.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I don't understand what you're saying.In post 1402, Porkens wrote:I understood your point but you missed mine. It’s about context. Farside was not a serious lynch possibility, and a vote on you aligns with a going theory. Dunn was, at that time, a candidate for lynch and there’s no steam (or good reason) to lynch HK.
You think farside is town. Why are you saying that she is "not a serious lynch possibility"?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
When the conversation is about players interacting or moving about like pieces on the board, I sometimes think it's easier to keep track of who is doing what by just listing out names including my own.In post 1402, Porkens wrote:WHY do you write about yourself in the third person?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Oh I see, this isn't coming from your perspective about who is a good lynch candidate. You're speaking from the perspective of farside and Dunn.In post 1403, Green Crayons wrote:
I don't understand what you're saying.In post 1402, Porkens wrote:I understood your point but you missed mine. It’s about context. Farside was not a serious lynch possibility, and a vote on you aligns with a going theory. Dunn was, at that time, a candidate for lynch and there’s no steam (or good reason) to lynch HK.
You think farside is town. Why are you saying that she is "not a serious lynch possibility"?
How is going for a vanity bw AI depending on the pressure on that person pushing for the bw?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Pork, what are your thoughts about Mala?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Wait.In post 1410, geraintm wrote:Yeah , I do think no lynch is better than a bad lynch. Odds for town tomorrow are better at 9/12 than 8/11
What the actual hell?
Not only should you know better that no lynches are bad,
but also a no lynchwould specifically undermine your ability to be productive, as you have said your bad/lazy in D1 because there is no flip to work off of.
If we no lynch, then there's no flip for D2. And you're going to be just as bad."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I am shook rn.
I was reading gerain as townlean but that no lynch suggestion is scummy as hell"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 252, geraintm wrote:I have nothing at the moment. day 1 people talk but it doesn't mean anything. votes are the important thing and there just haven't been many so far. I'm very much the type of person who looks at people's voting patterns and trying to either spot inconsistencies or really, really bad logic used to justify them
when I say you all do you, it is just me saying I don't have the mental capacity to argue over perceived slights, misunderstandings or whateverIn post 271, geraintm wrote:DAy 1 means little at the time. on later days of the game there might be useful info.
you may well be able to catch scum teams on day 1, I am not that good a player to do that. as I said, you all do you but for me, Day 1 is just weird until some wagons form and I can see who is on them and who isn't.
Okay looking back at your ISO, I see you never explicitly said that you needed flips to be productive.In post 537, geraintm wrote:
I like this postIn post 535, Green Crayons wrote:
Also, I cannot express enough how bad it is to try to fill up scum team slots in D1. Associative suspicions are practically worthless in D1 without flips.In post 533, stungun0404 wrote:in the corresponding scum slot
But "needing wagons" + agreeing that pre-flip associative suspicion cases are bad = wanting a flip to start getting to work, in my mind."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I don't see how a scum under pressure is more inclined to vote someone that's not going to get traction (what's the benefit? people think it's *so* bland that it's town?), rather than voting for someone who will get traction (benefit being pressure shifting away).In post 1419, Porkens wrote:Its the context that is AI. Dunn was parking his vote on a nogo wagon at a time when he was under scrutiny. That’s a “safe” vote, right?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
With a 2006 registration date, you're telling me you've never had this theory discussion about D1 no lynches?In post 1435, geraintm wrote:
It isnscummy to want more town to be alive on day 2?In post 1433, stungun0404 wrote:
I think this together with your point of not claiming today is scummy. You are pretty high on my lynch list next day phase, and I hope others see what I am seeing here too. Both are anti-town perspectives.In post 1410, geraintm wrote:
Yeah , I do think no lynch is better than a bad lynch. Odds for town tomorrow are better at 9/12 than 8/11In post 1191, bob3141 wrote:
Germa we are at the eleventh hour of the day. With no lynch approaching and yet you are still on your vanity vote. You keep saying shogun is wrong but who do you think is the best lynch today. Because as it stands we are a poaching the deadline and porkens is the lead lynch. Followed by dun and green.
Do you see a no lynch as better than lynching Porkens?
As if you are town that what your lack of anything but vanity vote is contributing too.
As most of your posts have been about how you don't like shoguns pushes but you have not come up with any of your own. So who do you want to lynch today? That is a realistic prospect.
How is that anti town?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
What is the stalling theory?
The no claim theory was after Porkens claimed. That's NAI as he's just disagreeing on theory."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I'm not going to flash bw gerain for this reason.In post 1450, votato wrote:we dont have time to get a claim and properly evaluate gerain. ill compromise on the wagon if needed, but porkens is a good wagon."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
What is this first game that you're referencing?In post 1449, bob3141 wrote:In teh first game he kept saying. He was happy with any lynch. and that was big reason he got run up that game. So for him to say he wants no lynch is very out of character
Did he say that in D1?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Also.In post 1464, Green Crayons wrote:
What is this first game that you're referencing?In post 1449, bob3141 wrote:In teh first game he kept saying. He was happy with any lynch. and that was big reason he got run up that game. So for him to say he wants no lynch is very out of character
Did he say that in D1?
What.
"Gerain did X in another game as town. Doing X got him lynched."
"Gerain is not doing not-X. That means he's scum."
Wouldn't Gerain, regardless of alignment, not keep doing X that got him lynched as town?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Fixed. I incorrectly put in a double negative.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Okay by "run up" I thought you meant "strung up," as in lynched.
I still don't see how him changing his behavior to avoid doing something that got his a lot of votes as town is AI.
I mean, he's gone to the opposite extreme. So that's something worth considering. But I'm not keen on these last minute flash wagons."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Because of the sudden excitement--again--at an anything-but-BM/Clidd/Porkens push."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
his no lynch recommendation is AI. no lynch benefits scum, has no benefits to town.
his no more D1 claims isn't AI. scum and town alike can adopt that position.
his "stalling" position isn't AI. scum and town alike can adopt that position.
having ONE suspicious action, at the end of the day, isn't going to move my vote for a flashwagon."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I view this differently from germain saying that he wanted wagons to analyze before voting, and then not really acting when there have been several actions--which, when you cut out the meta argument of bob's 1484, I think is what he's saying.In post 1485, Green Crayons wrote:his "stalling" position isn't AI. scum and town alike can adopt that position.
So that's TWO things I find suspicious."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
town are frequently paralyzed with trying to find a good vote to placeIn post 1486, stungun0404 wrote:It is antitown that his vote is still on NotScience and has not moved since RVS.
so can scum
NAI
still, that's different than not acting in the face of the game developing in a way that he said would trigger his ability to meaningfully scumhunt"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Because of farside's reasons or something else?In post 1501, Not_Mafia wrote:Let's lynch Maris"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
How many times has the BM slot hit 4 votes and then just withered, or to hit 4 slots again?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
only to*
And again. And again."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
why votato?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Why gerain?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
i cannot stress this enough.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I just don't understand you.In post 1532, stungun0404 wrote:my biggest TR Bob"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Thankfucksomeone killed Porkens."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Having to explain how his death would be necessary to analyze the gerain mislynch would have made me convulse."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Basic rules of thumb wagon analysis without post/contribution context (so, all subject to change once going back through to analyze context):In post 1577, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
stungun0404, bob3141, votato,geraintm(7):Porkens, Dunnstral, HK 50, Not_Mafia
Dunnstral (2):DoctorPepper, Malakittens
votato (2):farside22,notscience
Green CrayonsPorkens(1):
notscience(1):geraintm
Not voting (0):
Mod Notes:
Majority is 7 players.
[/area]A hammer has been reached.
- probably 1 additional scum was on the gerain mislynch, 1 scum was off
- if 4 scum, probably contextual to determine whether on or off
- scum usually don't like to vote back to back, so porkens' lynch neighbors (votato, Dunn) are less suspicious
And then, shooting from the hip about how I was remembering things at the conclusion of D1:
- out of non-gerain voters (DP, Mala, farside/maxwell, GC), my suspicion hierarchy is: Mala --> farside/maxwell --> DP
- out of the gerain voters (stun, bob, votato, Dunn, HK, NM), my suspicion hierarchy is: bob, HK, votato, Dunn, stun, NM"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I'm curious to hear from maxwell, as farside was a slot I seriously suspected until about 80% of the way through of D1, when I started getting town vibes."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
good lookin'In post 1588, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm looking at bob"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I need to reread which I'll do tonight."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Mala, weren't you V/La for several days on D1?
I think that's where the you've been missing feeling is coming from."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
It looks like an associative tell.In post 1603, maxwell wrote:
I'm not sure why this is necessarily true? The logic seems very arbitrary.In post 1599, Malakittens wrote:So I’m thinking that one of his scum partners might be someone he mentions quite often. I know he mentions Vot a lot, along with Dun.
I don't think I agree with it, but it's not really arbitrary."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Spoiler: first volley of interesting BM posts
ugh. BM might be silly enough to throw in a scum buddy in his list of town suspects. If so, I'm going to say it's HK, since he made a point of voting HK and this the Mala/BM interaction looks genuine.
But honestly I'm leaning this to being all town.
-----
Spoiler: more BM + HK or Mala interaction
idk, i just don't see this as scum talking to one of his buddies"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Spoiler: BM's first vote after GC
So before BM voted votato, there was competing Dunn and votato wagons--both at 4 votes.
BM deicded to vote votato.
votato more likely to be town.
I think this is NAI about anyone else on the votato-wagon (Mala, stun ns, bob).
EITHER Dunn OR someone on the Dunn-wagon more likely to be scum (DP, farside/max, HK, GC)."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I'm a bit ambivalent about this, actually.In post 1658, Green Crayons wrote:EITHER Dunn OR someone on the Dunn-wagon more likely to be scum (DP, farside/max, HK, GC).
not about votato more likely being town."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
oh alsoIn post 421, Green Crayons wrote:His vote on votato looks made up.
First, his vote:
He reads votato as scum only because of your meta analysis. But your meta analysis specifically said it was a wash on alignment, and so wasn't AI:In post 343, Battle Mage wrote:
Challenge accepted!In post 315, Green Crayons wrote:Votato votes are lazy. I bet one of y'all are scum.
VOTE: Votato
I like the meta analysis by stungun, clearly nobody is getting behind Green Crayons, and I think I'm townleaning Dunnstral. And seriously, voting BM on Day 1? This dude has run out of ideas...
So his votato vote pushes a wagon based on nothing AI. He does get in a sweet "lol ooOooOooOoo I'm teasing you with maybe I'm scum" jab, which is more likely to come from scum than town.In post 334, stungun0404 wrote:While you may be fairly active in some of your scum games, this evidence does not suggest that in your town games you are always lurking at the start.Thus, I don't think this initial analysis into your gameplay is very alignment-indicative, as it seems you are breaking pattern regardless of alignment.
Then, this continued vote despite:
He points to non-player-specific meta that would suggest that votato is town. But just lols over it and keeps his votato vote. His decision to pick and choose "meta" to justify whether votes should move is particularly glaring when you consider he uses meta a few posts later in Post 403 to argue votes on Dunn are misplaced.In post 404, Battle Mage wrote:In post 391, votato wrote:i have a little but i cant talk about it. by day 2 or 3 ill probably give some more details. as for the association you're drawing between me and dunn, stun, you're right that we aren't scumbuddies, but i dont think your reasons why are all that strong. plus the only reason you know that is cuz you and i are scumbuddies.In post 392, votato wrote:shit wrong thread.
Last time I saw something like this it flipped town, but what can ya do!?
lol
okay votato is town y'all"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Spoiler: BM and Dunn
So I thought that BM's first point where he asks me what my Dunn vote is all about suggested Dunn is town--BM-scum is looking for real reasons to vote Dunn.
But then he changes Dunn to being town.
And then votes votato over the tied bandwagon on Dunn.
And then has this weird way of explaining why Dunn is town.
And then promises farside a Dunn lynch in the future if they could just do a GC lynch.
Not looking good for Dunn.
ALL OF THAT SAID:
Would scum meta each other to defend?In post 403, Battle Mage wrote:
And I saw Dunnstral playing completely different to this as scum.In post 402, Dunnstral wrote:I saw battle mage playing similar to this as town.
my goodness, maybe. i'm cringing just thinking of that possibility."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Spoiler: Porkens enters the ring
looks like Porkens saw that he was on the chopping block, and made a case for a scum buddy to throw off the scent
tbf, I ran across my old posts talking about how Porkens' vote on Dunn looked made up
at the time I thought it was made up because he wanted the town to vote elsewhere to save himself from a town execution
now I'm thinking he was accepting his fate and was trying to throw the scent off from his buddy if Porkens flipped
HRM Hard to know which of those is correct
Spoiler: GC ego posting"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Spoiler: Porkens and bob
Porkens makes a scum pool of: geraintm, stungun, dunnstral, bob, and tato
In the first post he says bob is in the pool because "Bob has a TR on Dunn for some reason (also bob almost never expresses any reads, never commits)."
In the second post he says bob is in the pool because "(bob is scummy on his own and also hops on the Dunn TR team)"
bob's just sort of thrown in there and forgotten about. If Dunn isn't scum with Porkens, I would think it's bob. nebulous "other" scummy suspicions.
Though, actually, if Dunn is scum bob is likely town. If Dunn flipped scum, Porkens had a basis to argue for a bob lynch (the only articulated reason why bob is scummy is him TRing Dunn).
FWIW I think this scum pool and the reasons for it confirm stun/cat and votato as likely town"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
okay i caught up on my ISO reads of the Porkens slot
VOTE: Dunn
I'm fine with this vote for now. I'd also be okay with a bob vote.
I should also go and ISO Dunn and Bob and actually reread the shift to gerain in full and not by ISO, but I've only got so much stamina to reread mafia each night"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
^5In post 1664, votato wrote:ill sheep that"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 1695, HK 50 wrote:
Can you explain the stungun/cat part of this more? Is it due to the lack of discussion from pork?In post 1666, Green Crayons wrote:FWIW I think this scum pool and the reasons for it confirm stun/cat and votato as likely town
Scum isn’t likely to put all teammates in a lynch pool. Dunn/bob are the more likely team candidates so that bolsters town read on others.In post 1695, HK 50 wrote:
Can you explain the stungun/cat part of this more? Is it due to the lack of discussion from pork?In post 1666, Green Crayons wrote:FWIW I think this scum pool and the reasons for it confirm stun/cat and votato as likely town
also. According to Porkens, Stun is scummy bc defending Dunn, and votato was scummy for following stun. It’s associative tells when we had no flips, which doesn’t really make sense. I also don’t think scum would string out bald associative suspicions among their actual scum mates."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
You’re just voting the wrong player.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Yeah I can't really tell if HK is vomit posting to get his thoughts out on a page for him to review, or for him to look like he's contributing.
Honestly, HK, it hasn't been helpful.
Give me a HEADLINE (who you suspect, who is town).
Then give me BULLET POINTS (of why--primarily for who you suspect, but you can do it for town too).
Make the bullet points ONE OR TWO SENTENCES. Those sentences better be 20 WORDS OR LESS."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
bob tooIn post 1710, Green Crayons wrote:Yeah I can't really tell if HK is vomit posting to get his thoughts out on a page for him to review, or for him to look like he's contributing.
Honestly, HK, it hasn't been helpful.
Give me a HEADLINE (who you suspect, who is town).
Then give me BULLET POINTS (of why--primarily for who you suspect, but you can do it for town too).
Make the bullet points ONE OR TWO SENTENCES. Those sentences better be 20 WORDS OR LESS."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
btw votato slot is probably my second strongest town read so stop throwing shade at it
what do you think about Dunn and Mala?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Who is this?In post 1705, Dunnstral wrote:Now they're back on me again because my read was wrong, or something to that effect"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
btw this is in reference to the slot's scumminess/lack thereof, was not a comment on the banIn post 1712, Green Crayons wrote:stop throwing shade"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
DP is pretty town so don't know why people keep going back to this well."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons