Mafiascum.net

What’s wrong with surface level reads?

In post 200, Porkens wrote:What’s wrong with surface level reads?

I'm still waiting for their answer to my question before i answer my thoughts regarding it.

Fair sorry

In post 193, androgybee wrote:

In post 181, catboi wrote:(●ↀωↀ●) something_smart is obvious town for 114.

(๑ↀᆺↀ๑) Porkens is also town for his interpretation of the claim, thinking Radical Rat was trying to avoid getting corruption lowered and being suspicious of it.

(^・ω・^ ) androgybee probably town? Banana town, I guess. Radical Rat probably town for reasons stated in response to claim.


୧(๑•̀ᗝ•́)૭ Mafia: Dumb and Dumber, Norwee, redtea


(ﾉ^ヮ^)ﾉ*:・ﾟ✧ Easy game, people~

ヾ(・ω・*) i like your reads, though the porkens one doesnt make much sense to me... any thoughts on joey? i feel like theyve still had some of the juiciest content.

~Natdia

Juicy how

In post 193, androgybee wrote:

In post 181, catboi wrote:(●ↀωↀ●) something_smart is obvious town for 114.

(๑ↀᆺↀ๑) Porkens is also town for his interpretation of the claim, thinking Radical Rat was trying to avoid getting corruption lowered and being suspicious of it.

(^・ω・^ ) androgybee probably town? Banana town, I guess. Radical Rat probably town for reasons stated in response to claim.


୧(๑•̀ᗝ•́)૭ Mafia: Dumb and Dumber, Norwee, redtea


(ﾉ^ヮ^)ﾉ*:・ﾟ✧ Easy game, people~

ヾ(・ω・*) i like your reads, though the porkens one doesnt make much sense to me... any thoughts on joey? i feel like theyve still had some of the juiciest content.

~Natdia

( =´∀｀)✎ I think porkens expressing distrust of radical rat comes from a place of genuine belief that they were trying not to lower their corruption levels. It's a town thought process that goes "maybe they are scum who want corruption". Joey_ honestly does not leave much of an impression on me. Even going through his ISO, I'm not struck by whatever you see as . I don't think your early read on him is unreasonable as he definitely hasn't done anything towny but mostly his posts are just "meh".

In post 199, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Catboi
You expressed disliking of Dumb & Dumber giving me townpings. Then you put both me and him as scum. Does that mean you considered us to have partner equity? Because that seems like a very surface level read. Can you explain your scumread on me further in case i misunderstood you here?

(⌯͒ᵕɪᵕ⌯͒)zzZ My post was never intended as a comprehensive solve, just a list of "here are some people whose posts have bothered me". Indeed, if I tried to fit together a comprehensive picture them townreading you would make you less likely to be partners. Your posts had mostly been jokey and fillery and I didn't care for that.

@catboi what do you think of your own ISO, objectively ?

Also I hope you know for a fact you can’t call yourself Catboi if you don’t tr me

In post 205, Joey_ wrote:@catboi what do you think of your own ISO, objectively ?

(・_・ヾ I don't care. Why would I? If someone has a problem with my posts I can answer for it, but I'm not playing for optics right now.

In post 207, catboi wrote:

In post 205, Joey_ wrote:@catboi what do you think of your own ISO, objectively ?

(・_・ヾ I don't care. Why would I? If someone has a problem with my posts I can answer for it, but I'm not playing for optics right now.

Idk, I am just asking stupid questions, tryin’ to generate content and get serious votes

I have 3 lock town so far and its a secret town village, only I knows

In post 204, catboi wrote:Indeed, if I tried to fit together a comprehensive picture them townreading you would make you less likely to be partners.

Perfect, since we do townread Norwegianboi.

-Dumbass

In post 204, catboi wrote:Your posts had mostly been jokey and fillery and I didn't care for that.

The irony.

Although you've gotten slightly better in the later pages.

i kind of hate everyone involved for flinging shit for 50 posts instead of waiting for SS to come back. Not one (1) person suggested doing so.

Anyway

In post 188, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And also answer why i'm mafia together with a dweeb such as Redtea.

r00d
also related to what I'm about to say

In post 210, Dumb and Dumber wrote:

In post 204, catboi wrote:Indeed, if I tried to fit together a comprehensive picture them townreading you would make you less likely to be partners.

Perfect, since we do townread Norwegianboi.

-Dumbass

I'll admit right now I have no reads formed in my head, therefore at present I'm not indicating any read on D&D here. But there's a lot of "gutsy scum" types of posts such as these in this thread, and speaking from a personal standpoint, are not helpful to town.
Like I get being cheeky once in a while, but it does seem pervasive in this game and the thing is, that only makes it easier for maf to navigate.

oh you know what I never
UNVOTE: bananacucho

In post 210, Dumb and Dumber wrote:

In post 204, catboi wrote:Indeed, if I tried to fit together a comprehensive picture them townreading you would make you less likely to be partners.

Perfect, since we do townread Norwegianboi.

-Dumbass

Why do you townread me?

In post 212, redtea wrote:I'll admit right now I have no reads formed in my head, therefore at present I'm not indicating any read on D&D here. But there's a lot of "gutsy scum" types of posts such as these in this thread, and speaking from a personal standpoint, are not helpful to town.
Like I get being cheeky once in a while, but it does seem pervasive in this game and the thing is, that only makes it easier for maf to navigate.

I've been trying to tone myself down if you're referring to me.

In post 204, catboi wrote:Indeed, if I tried to fit together a comprehensive picture them townreading you would make you less likely to be partners.

Good answer.
Not sure i'm seeing scum!D&D though.

In post 209, Joey_ wrote:I have 3 lock town so far and its a secret town village, only I knows

This seems like a townpost.
I think scum!Joey would be more eagerly willing to share their reads and attempt to pocket players than hide it.
I'm not overly familiar with their scum-game though. So i don't know if the have the strength to fake things like this.

VOTE: Jackel98
I don't townread you.

In post 204, catboi wrote:My post was never intended as a comprehensive solve,

Actually. You did specifically say: "EASY GAME PEOPLE LELELELE" which made me believe that was your final game solve.

Here I am at it again, multiposting. Feels bad.

In post 146, redtea wrote:

In post 85, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 80, androgybee wrote:BananaCucho are you a third party?
Wanting corruptions sounds very 3p to me, I guess a town role with the power to tag literally everyone could make your role town?. Like what your describing doesn't make sense as either town or scum to me lol.

~Bee

No I'm town. It'll make more sense later, trust me

If I was 3rd party that would be messed up, me not having a vote day 1 was outted since the beginning lol. "Where's banana in the vc?"

Even if I held off explaining that bit and held off voting people would be suspicious by EOD why I've gone so long without voting

"It'll make more sense later".
:/

Just for you bananacucho: indicating you have a special role without elaborating is usually to earn brownie points for "revealing" details but without giving the whole of your role away, or leaving a telling hint regarding it, it doesn't actually point to any alignment. Now, obviously, some parts of your role were revealed to us by the mod through the vc. I know that's out of your hands. But it doesn't make sense to entertain someone's thoughts about your role this way; not outside of how your role would interact with Bee's FC'd role. In other words, it's strange to engage in convo about what alignment your role seems to lean to rather than the sheer mechanics of it, especially now, and especially when you're not going to get into all the details of your role right now anyways.
Not to mention: no one would sus you for clearly not being included in the vc in any way. We'd wonder about what your role is exactly, sure, but you didn't wait for us to cross that bridge. And you didn't actually need to "explain" any bit at all.

Don't take this as me asking for a full role reveal. I'm not asking for that; don't claim if it's not imperative, yada yada.

This has been my elaboration of ":/".

(o
it wasn't multiposting anymore
feels good)

In post 215, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 212, redtea wrote:I'll admit right now I have no reads formed in my head, therefore at present I'm not indicating any read on D&D here. But there's a lot of "gutsy scum" types of posts such as these in this thread, and speaking from a personal standpoint, are not helpful to town.
Like I get being cheeky once in a while, but it does seem pervasive in this game and the thing is, that only makes it easier for maf to navigate.

I've been trying to tone myself down if you're referring to me.

I did include you in that post, so. One of the people, yeah.
I mean, that's good.

In post 220, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 204, catboi wrote:My post was never intended as a comprehensive solve,

Actually. You did specifically say: "EASY GAME PEOPLE LELELELE" which made me believe that was your final game solve.

But this is a joke right.

In post 223, redtea wrote:But this is a joke right.

What's a joke?