Page 9 of 13
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 7:40 pm
by iNtuition
Implosion what of my list of town/scum intents do you not feel is an objective representation of the field of possible motivations? what do you mean by assigning how i play to someone else? are those not all the ways a person plays?
-hornet
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 7:43 pm
by implosion
In post 200, iNtuition wrote:Implosion what of my list of town/scum intents do you not feel is an objective representation of the field of possible motivations? what do you mean by assigning how i play to someone else? are those not all the ways a person plays?
-hornet
Not sure what the first question is referencing; for the second, it looks sort of like you're saying you could have acted this way as scum and ascribing that to another player with a different style, essentially you're calling something scum-indicative that to me seems better explainable by Casey's personality or playstyle.
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 7:43 pm
by luncheon
@implosion except i was cleared earlier by intuition
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 7:44 pm
by iNtuition
In post 48, luncheon wrote:Congrats to NM, that was a really efficient way to throw the game for the seven other people on your team.
luncheon is town for the expression of anger here. idk just the way it's worded feels genuine. the congrats part. or maybe the efficient part
-hornet
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 7:47 pm
by iNtuition
In post 201, implosion wrote:Not sure what the first question is referencing; for the second, it looks sort of like you're saying you could have acted this way as scum and ascribing that to another player with a different style, essentially you're calling something scum-indicative that to me seems better explainable by Casey's personality or playstyle.
the first question is a different version of the second. i didn't explain her actions based on how i would play, i did so based on what i believe to be all the reasons any player does something. so my question is what about the list of possible motivations is not objective, but subjective?
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:19 pm
by redtea
@implosion we do not lose if Casey's maf if no one accepts her trust. Town wincon is reaching 1 town 1 maf.
At this point I'd be fine with leaving luncheon and hellbooks together and trusting Casey though, personally.
@luncheon
actually, you never posted in between intuition trusting you and the next day starting. When a new day starts trust offers are reset. You aint clear.
then what's
In post 188, luncheon wrote:I wanna say that given that
i don't think implosion is scum
and
that brooks/intuition now have a even 50/50 chance of being scum
, that intuition having the early sr on brooks makes town!intuition having a sincere sr statistically likely?
supposed to mean.
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:34 pm
by luncheon
it means, I didn't think implosion was scum.
so fmpov that meant scum was a rough statistical 50/50 between books and implosion if I trust my top tr
I didn't know Casey wasn't cleared either.
Okay, thats fair enough, I'm not cleared
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:48 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 194, implosion wrote:does anyone object to me (or someone else) trusting casey just to get that possibility out of the way? We're losing if she's scum, right?
Not if no one takes the first step
Anyway we have 4 clears now which is nice, 50%
Btw I just watched a 30 minute video of Among Us gameplay and it’s a game I’m surprised isn’t more of a buzz on this site
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:59 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Does scum let go like that if there’s also non-mechanical evidence for being Town? I doubt it tbh. I think luncheon is town.
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:15 am
by Casey
Intuition you're supposed to untrust. Leaving it an open invitation is skeevy.
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:16 am
by Casey
Hellbooks, Intuition, Luncheon.
Hm, hm, hm.
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:20 am
by Casey
On a reread, Hellbooks hasn't contributed much. The strongest town indicator for her is her gayness which admittedly is a strong pull.
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:22 am
by Casey
Luncheon reads like a regular townie.
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:25 am
by hellbooks
so clearing one person out of us three means we are guaranteed parity right?
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:26 am
by hellbooks
oh actually no
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:27 am
by hellbooks
cuz casey
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:28 am
by hellbooks
this could definitely be a very town thing
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:28 am
by Casey
And I re-read Intuition. I'm mad because Intuition reads townier than Hellbooks.
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:29 am
by hellbooks
intuition clearing implosion is a highly town thing yes
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:30 am
by Casey
I trust Luncheon
Sorry in advance if this loses us the game. Won't feel bad at all losing to Luncheon.
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:30 am
by hellbooks
i would much rather u do intuition
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:30 am
by hellbooks
i dont think luncheon is particularly towny
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:31 am
by Casey
Untrust
Why? What makes him maf?
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:31 am
by hellbooks
oh wait he was cleared by intuition??
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:32 am
by hellbooks
wait why are we considering him in the scumpool if intuition trusted him at the beginning