- Trendall
- Zurel
- Town looter
- Salsabil Faria
- AuroraDash
- TheDuke
- wiyvern
- Titus
These are my current reads as of right now.
Titus's partner is probably in the null pile.
I think we've got a fair bit of information already.In post 202, TheDuke wrote:I'm not really comfortable with voting any more until I get some more information.
In post 13, Zurel wrote:If I die early, can I put my name in the next newbie game sign-up? Or can I already do that now?
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
Reason: Because.
These two posts demonstrate genuine noobiness - consistent lack of understanding acrossIn post 17, Zurel wrote:Thanks. I'll see what I'm going to do once I get a hang of the game.
So for this random stage, is it necessary for us to get someone eliminated? Also, can someone refrain from voting? Because they're pacifist maybe.
And then I don't see newb scum making this post. I can't see lack of content/conversation ever featuring in a scum thought process - unless they literally didn't even read the rules before they started posting, I think this comment comes from town 9 times out of 10.In post 24, Zurel wrote:So this will go on for ten literal days? What do people even talk about?
For those wondering about what Titus means here:In post 135, Titus wrote:Not if you knew I wouldn't let you get away with denying his towniness.In post 75, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Their tone in their 3 posts so far have been very town. Newb!scum doesn't have the pre-necessitated skills to fake the type of content they've made, they just don't.In post 73, Salsabil Faria wrote:his/her being newbie doesn't mean that she/he has to be the townie! he/she can a newbie scum too, right? how do you reach the conclusion of his/her being townie here?
It's true that if i was scum i would know everyone's alignment beforehand. But calling out someone that could easily be elimination bait later on as town if i'm scum would be contrary to my wincon if i was mafia.
None should. It's the kind of contrived scenario scum makes up to justify their vote.In post 210, Town looter wrote:^^ Note I don't believe that scenario
Mine was an RVS vote shortly after yours.In post 128, Zurel wrote:I wonder if Looter and Duke realised that Norway already had votes when they put in their votes.
Before I share my thoughts on Norway, humour me for a second: What is it you are seeing that is different?In post 149, Titus wrote: Your responses have been terrible though and much different than Manatee's mafia, which I am sure TL sees that too.
In post 63, TheDuke wrote:Hello!
Just going off a gut feeling here,
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
This is an incredibly reliable method of decision and he is absolutely 100% scum.
VOTE: TheDukeIn post 202, TheDuke wrote:UNVOTE:
I'm not really comfortable with voting any more until I get some more information.
Could be onto something here -- that unvote seems a bit wishywashy and strange to me. There's plenty of information, so what would there be to gain by claiming there isn't? Could be either a) confusion or b) desire to slow down the day, but I don't find either of those convincing, because the thread is not that complex yet and there's stillTown looter wrote:In post 63, TheDuke wrote:Hello!
Just going off a gut feeling here,
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
This is an incredibly reliable method of decision and he is absolutely 100% scum.VOTE: TheDukeIn post 202, TheDuke wrote:UNVOTE:
I'm not really comfortable with voting any more until I get some more information.
This is a good wagon.
I'd also like to point out that this vote way back here also brought him to E/L-1 -- at that point it was Zurel, Looter, Duke, Trendall -- and nobody pointed it out.In post 79, Trendall wrote:You know he was being ironic in the second one, no way you don't know that.In post 77, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 63, TheDuke wrote:Just going off a gut feeling here,These two stances don't match well so i'm wagering this slot is scum for now.In post 63, TheDuke wrote: This is an incredibly reliable method of decision and he is absolutely 100% scum.
Vote: NorwegianboyEE
VOTE: TheDukeIn post 215, Town looter wrote:In post 63, TheDuke wrote:Hello!
Just going off a gut feeling here,
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
This is an incredibly reliable method of decision and he is absolutely 100% scum.VOTE: TheDukeIn post 202, TheDuke wrote:UNVOTE:
I'm not really comfortable with voting any more until I get some more information.
This is a good wagon.
Maybe no one realised it since no one was updating the vc at that time. Also, people are currently reading Trendall as town so this wasn't suspicious. I guess. Don't mind me.In post 217, AuroraDash wrote:I'd also like to point out that this vote way back here also brought him to E/L-1 -- at that point it was Zurel, Looter, Duke, Trendall -- and nobody pointed it out.In post 79, Trendall wrote:You know he was being ironic in the second one, no way you don't know that.In post 77, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 63, TheDuke wrote:Just going off a gut feeling here,These two stances don't match well so i'm wagering this slot is scum for now.In post 63, TheDuke wrote: This is an incredibly reliable method of decision and he is absolutely 100% scum.
Vote: NorwegianboyEE
I'm pretty sure it's just Looter and yourself at this point, which would make it L-3 I believe.Zurel wrote:
This isn't worth anything considering I'm a noob, but I don't feel like Titus is scum so despite all the argument Trendall and Norway were building against her, I don't want to vote her. This wagon seems better. Pretty sure it's not L-1 yet.