Alright here was my overnight theory:
In post 132, Momrangal wrote:The list also scores high in neurotics which means
town will see red hearings where they don't exist and scum will be hyper aware of the game state, and what they are putting out.
I do think that frogster decided to do this thing before he drew his role, but the way he's moving forward with the play is pushing the game in a good direction
In a similar vein, NPOM also pushes the game in a positive direction and the only real concern I have there is his desire to be apart of a townbloc prematurely.
I'm also town reading Grendel for his stance on townblocking this early
In post 62, Frogsterking wrote:I think Lunar Martian noticed something was off about NoPowerOverMe's post because they're super-conscious of being partners because it's new. Similar to my opinion of NoPowerOverMe's evasiveness and lack of clarity I find Lunar's description here about what he was thinking to be evasive in a way that also has a lot of potential to be AI.
You really think they, as they as scum would do this? It makes no sense to soft bus a partner this early on when they could be called on it, and forced to get into a harder stance against their partner. I think that's indicative of t/t or if they are scum, they are early on looking for ways to push what seems to be an easy target early on because of how disagreeable NPOM Is
I'm also moee than certain that NPOMS disagreeableness is NAI
I interpreted this as "@town don't look for red herrings they're in your imagination @traitor read my messages I'm aware of what I'm writing."
The first thing that struck me. There's 0 follow up to this comment.
At first I thought it might be a message to Lunar, who in this theory is the traitor, to join the push on Bugs today. I looked to see if there was an out-of-context vote on Bugs later and there was:
In post 828, Lunar Martian wrote: In post 827, Trendall wrote:I don't mind voting bugspray but I don't think it's the best elimination. They could be maf tho.
Grendel you're right in that I'd prefer not to compromise, but I will. The quoted post makes me particularly fine with voting for bugspray. Still prefer ER or Trendall though.
VOTE: bugspray
That should be 5 votes, or E-2.
Weird. Then I gave it a second thought and started wondering if it was a different message to Lunar, intended to be read as
THIS (your post, or you), BUGS, AND ME.
Then I keep going and see Lunar scum casing Trendall on D2, as though Lunar had given the message a second thought as well and come to a similar conclusion.
Weird vote,
______________
I'm NOT going to get into any of the associative tells between Bugs and Lunar that don't directly apply to my theory. The whole voting and unvoting thing and suddenly FoSing each other is worth looking into separately IMO.
In post 462, bugspray wrote:im very scared of Luca because I can't read him and remember him rolling scum one time and believing he looked exactly like town!Luca and trying to elim me at any time is usually not very controversial (meta me if you're into that)
and neither is wanting to elim lunar which makes me very
npim here is reminding me increasingly of town!formerfish
I thought this was Bug's first attempt to soft to Lunar they're on the same team, following up Mom's soft.
In post 547, bugspray wrote:Frog that's a pretty strange leading question. What are you trying to get out of it?
Bugs is defending Lunar here in response to a question I lobbed at Lunar, indicating Lunar is already on Bugs radar.
..Then Bugs votes Lunar. I thought it could be a late bus attempt as Luca pointed out or a "well if the traitor is just going to vote me better they go than I".
In post 562, bugspray wrote:calling my previous mention of lunar in
462 a strong tr is real reachy. a lot of the time i just have difficulty reading slots and pretend they don't exist and up until recently for me that was lunar
A LOT of defensiveness around this point. That makes me suspect the point is incorrect in concept but hits close enough to home to motivate Bugs to be defensive about it compared to other accusations. Bugs has clearly been aware of the presence of Lunar in this game for some time now (since at least
462 and defending them in
547 which I quoted above) so I believe Bugs is covering something up in this post.
Bugs also seems to be reacting heavily to this traitor point currently (D3) as well.
In post 567, bugspray wrote: In post 566, Lunar Martian wrote:If needed I can claim, but I prefer not to obviously. I'm not really willing to claim when half the people voting me haven't stated any reasons though. There's time, why don't the people voting me try to talk to me a little?
hey lunar what's your role?
I read this as Bugs trying to get the traitor to stop voting them by reminding them they're on the same team, or in my original theory to reread a little bit and check for the softs.
I read this the same as above.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.