I kind of think it's Andres but I don't think things will ever swing that way so I'm just sort of sitting hereIn post 4201, Vaxkiller wrote:BBmolla. Please do something. I can't protect you forever.
Large Normal 231 | Etymologies | Game Over
Forum rules
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
I kind of think Ander is scum yeah
Guys I claimed VT like three times- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
alsoIn post 4239, Mizzytastic wrote:etymonline.org wrote:day (n.)
Old Englishdæg"period during which the sun is above the horizon," also "lifetime, definite time of existence," from Proto-Germanic*dages-"day" (source also of Old Saxon, Middle Dutch, Dutchdag, Old Frisiandi,dei, Old High Germantag, GermanTag, Old Norsedagr, Gothicdags), according to Watkins, from PIE root "a day." He adds that the Germanic initiald-is "of obscure origin." But Boutkan says it is from PIE root*dhegh-"to burn" (see ). Not considered to be related to Latindies(which is from PIE root*dyeu-"to shine").
Meaning originally, in English, "the daylight hours;" it expanded to mean "the 24-hour period" in late Anglo-Saxon times. The day formerly began at sunset, hence Old EnglishWodnesnihtwas what we would call "Tuesday night." Names of the weekdays were not regularly capitalized in English until 17c.
From late 12c. as "a time period as distinguished from other time periods.""daily" is from late 14c.;Day-by-day"all the time" is from late 14c.all day"day away from work" is attested from 1883;Day offfirst recorded 1897. Theday-tripperdaysinnowadays, etc. is a relic of the Old English and Middle English use of the adverbial genitive.
"something unusual taken as routine" is by 1820. The nostalgicAll in a day's workis attested by 1907.those were the days, expressing mild doubt following some boast or claim, is by 1941. ToThat'll be the day"stop working" is by 1919; earliercall it a daycall it a half-day(1838)."at some day in the near future" is from late 15c.One of these days"a day of misfortune" is by 1936.One of those days
chkflip was scum off wagon
Titus wagon was not all town
so BBmolla/Vax teams are silly- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
In post 4354, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Ok. But do you have any actual evidence.In post 4352, BBmolla wrote:like there's gotta be at least one scum in {Luca, Andres, NorwEE}In post 4351, BBmolla wrote:
alsoIn post 4239, Mizzytastic wrote:etymonline.org wrote:day (n.)
Old Englishdæg"period during which the sun is above the horizon," also "lifetime, definite time of existence," from Proto-Germanic*dages-"day" (source also of Old Saxon, Middle Dutch, Dutchdag, Old Frisiandi,dei, Old High Germantag, GermanTag, Old Norsedagr, Gothicdags), according to Watkins, from PIE root "a day." He adds that the Germanic initiald-is "of obscure origin." But Boutkan says it is from PIE root*dhegh-"to burn" (see ). Not considered to be related to Latindies(which is from PIE root*dyeu-"to shine").
Meaning originally, in English, "the daylight hours;" it expanded to mean "the 24-hour period" in late Anglo-Saxon times. The day formerly began at sunset, hence Old EnglishWodnesnihtwas what we would call "Tuesday night." Names of the weekdays were not regularly capitalized in English until 17c.
From late 12c. as "a time period as distinguished from other time periods.""daily" is from late 14c.;Day-by-day"all the time" is from late 14c.all day"day away from work" is attested from 1883;Day offfirst recorded 1897. Theday-tripperdaysinnowadays, etc. is a relic of the Old English and Middle English use of the adverbial genitive.
"something unusual taken as routine" is by 1820. The nostalgicAll in a day's workis attested by 1907.those were the days, expressing mild doubt following some boast or claim, is by 1941. ToThat'll be the day"stop working" is by 1919; earliercall it a daycall it a half-day(1838)."at some day in the near future" is from late 15c.One of these days"a day of misfortune" is by 1936.One of those days
chkflip was scum off wagon
Titus wagon was not all town
so BBmolla/Vax teams are silly- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
whatIn post 4356, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Actually, it doesn't have to be a vig. 3P comes to mind.In post 4353, Andresvmb wrote:I think we need the Vig to Claim. I at least would like to have that.
are you high- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
Mafia can target their partners technicallyIn post 4390, Binatog13 wrote:In post 4371, BBmolla wrote:I think Binatog should out their resultSure, here we go.
Andres claimed VT right? Well I can confirm them. Andres was visited by rolecop (chkflip probably).
I’m not pushing that but Andres isn’t clear- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
Titus wagon was 100% townIn post 4455, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Literally the only way y’all could screw up this if you don’t eliminate in all of BBMolla/Vaxkiller/Hayker.
And whatever other dweebs are voting me.
Why would scum do that- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
Cause I’m townIn post 4472, Andresvmb wrote:
Why is this so hard for you to believe? Like theoretically in a game with this many executions, some of them could easily be just by random chance all Town. Like it’s a bad argument to make. Because of instead of pointing at who you think could be Scum on the wagon (which you’re not doing at all), you’re throwing a theoretical argument to what derail a wagon today?In post 4457, BBmolla wrote:
Titus wagon was 100% townIn post 4455, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Literally the only way y’all could screw up this if you don’t eliminate in all of BBMolla/Vaxkiller/Hayker.
And whatever other dweebs are voting me.
Why would scum do that- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
Scum would not use their Rolecop to target a buddy when they leaving alive a role watcher on purpose and most PRs are already mostly outed?In post 4474, Andresvmb wrote:
Why am I still on this solve? I want to see you make an argument agains Binatog. Because if you’re not doing that, then you’re being silly to think the Scum would waste their Role Cop who is under some massive suspicion on a buddy that particular night. There’s no common sense behind that at all and you should know better. Like I get that I’m not cleared and I don’t want people to assume that I am completely, but at the same time just trying to discredit me without making an actual argument against my slot or Binatog is bogus.In post 4461, BBmolla wrote:Hope you guys are right on Vax but the fact of the matter is there’s one scum in {Luca/Andres/NorwEE}
I seriously disagree- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
I am having trouble believing someone seriously believes thatIn post 4477, Andresvmb wrote:How does that answer my question at all? Okay you’re obviously going to insist you’re Town. But why is it impossible for a wagon to have formed with just all Town? I’ve been in games where that’s the case D1. And with a slot that has literally the entire game wrong (and go look at Titus’ ISO - it’s a mess), why is that unbelievable? I criticized Titus’ solves MULTIPLE times, and they WERE horrible.three mafiaall decided to not help a miselim
Show me one game where that happens and I’ll concede the point.- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
It’s not.In post 4480, Andresvmb wrote:
Go see if chkflip ever crumbs their target. If they did, then you could possibly make this ridiculous argument. If you can’t, then this is just idiotic.In post 4476, BBmolla wrote:Scum would not use their Rolecop to target a buddy when they leaving alive a role watcher on purpose and most PRs are already mostly outed?
I seriously disagree- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
For the hope that they are “cleared” in a situation where the rolecop isn’t necessarily needed anymoreIn post 4482, Andresvmb wrote:Like who works under the assumption that the Scum would use their Role in a game that is obviously incredibly heavy on PRs to target their buddy in the hopes that the backup Watcher targets the buddy.
If I had to guess I would have guessed all roles were outed by yesterday- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
I concede the pointIn post 4484, Andresvmb wrote:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12144862In post 4481, BBmolla wrote:
I am having trouble believing someone seriously believes thatIn post 4477, Andresvmb wrote:How does that answer my question at all? Okay you’re obviously going to insist you’re Town. But why is it impossible for a wagon to have formed with just all Town? I’ve been in games where that’s the case D1. And with a slot that has literally the entire game wrong (and go look at Titus’ ISO - it’s a mess), why is that unbelievable? I criticized Titus’ solves MULTIPLE times, and they WERE horrible.three mafiaall decided to not help a miselim
Show me one game where that happens and I’ll concede the point.- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
It’s more NorwEE than you, their leaps in logic this game have been ???In post 4486, Andresvmb wrote:Like I don’t understand why you think I just make shit up.
Like why did they assume third party?- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
There were still two people unclaimed at that pointIn post 4490, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
No vig claim.In post 4488, BBmolla wrote:Like why did they assume third party?
It’s an enormous leap- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
To make that assumption you’d be much more likely scumIn post 4492, NorwegianboyEE wrote:To argue that i’m insane to believe it could be third party is literally TMI’ing that there are 4 scum.
All I know is with the info I have there’s no way I’d make that guess- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
NorwEEs point is they aren’t claiming cause they are third party not this lolIn post 4495, Andresvmb wrote:Actually I’m starting to think Norwegian has a point. The reason the Vig is not outting is because they completely ruined the Scum plan and would get immediately shot by them at Night.- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
There can’t be a Vig.In post 4499, Andresvmb wrote:Those points are tied together. If the Vig is 3p, that’s the first execution in ELo with 4 flipped Scum and the game not over. No?
It can only be a serial killer if it’s third party.- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
Yep that is a reasonable assumption and I’ve never disputed itIn post 4509, Andresvmb wrote:But if the Vig *doesn’t* have to claim, and they want to take more shots, then that would be a good reason not to out.- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
In my experience SK kills are compulsive but it doesn’t look hard enforced so I guess if we’re under the assumption kills aren’t compulsive I can see the leap in logicIn post 4511, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
What do you mean.In post 4505, BBmolla wrote:Which as far as I’m aware has compulsive kills
What’s a plausible theory as to how these kills were blocked?
Not even mafia has compulsive kills.- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
- BBmolla
-
BBmolla Open Book
- BBmolla
- Open Book
- Open Book
- Posts: 23833
- Joined: May 29, 2011
hayker, with 26 posts, likely killed Binatog who was their most certain townread.In post 4314, Hayker wrote:Vanilla Townie here. Glad Chk died in the night. Now where do we go from here. bina is almost certainly town. Would have to be another big gambit to not be. Would not be worth I think for mafia to try. Titus was too self confident in her reads. Even so I want to consider at least BB on her list of targets.
Luca Blight, Binatog13, Andresvmb, NorwegianboyEE, Momrangal, Gamma Emerald, DrippingGoofball
These are the final votes on Titus. From there I can whittle down to norwegian, andres, GE, Luca, mom, in that order of my suspicians.
VOTE: norwegianboy - BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla
- BBmolla