Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:07 pm**

Vote Count 1-5

The first settlers of Iceland wanted to replicate the best parts of Norwegian governance while avoiding the strong centralized authority of a king. They kept the Norwegian tradition of laws and district legal assemblies. This created a unique structure. Multiple chieftains shared a district, and the free men of a district could choose which chieftain they supported. The chieftains would look after their assembly people's interests and the assembly people would support the chieftains in war and disputes. They would also attend regional and national assemblies (called Alþingi). Regional assemblies resolved local disputes. The national assemblies codified and interpreted laws. The Alþingi still meets today, and is the oldest parliamentary institution in existence.

flow trap

(2): floo, Enchant

esotericzoomer

(2): Spartan117, safebet222

safebet222

(1): Fredrick A Campbell

Fredrick A Campbell

(1): flow trap

Not Voting

(3): esotericzoomer, Prism, Salsabil Faria

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to eliminate.

Deadline: January 23, Midnight US Eastern Time.

Countdown: (expired on 2021-01-22 21:00:00)

Mod Notes:

-

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 12:17 am**

@mod... I think you missed my vote on post 144.

fixed! ~f

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:31 am**

In post 142, flow trap wrote:Can we place votes here even if it's on a MoO it's still helpful

Vote where? And what is MoO?

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:38 am**

In post 172, flow trap wrote:EZ, would you agree that mafia doesn't want attention?

Not necessarily, I saw mafia can be super active to get townie point.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:40 am**

In post 175, flow trap wrote:Ok, it was a bluff, that was a reaction test; I retract my statements

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:42 am**

In post 189, safebet222 wrote:If I didn't know any better, I'd think that enchant is trying to pocket Salsa. She was quick hammered by Not_Mafia and enchant in Newbie 2042 during D2 and they passed that shit off as a lolhammer that enchant rode into F3 and won for mafia.

not gonna fooling this time!

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:45 am**

In post 205, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 189, safebet222 wrote:If I didn't know any better, I'd think that enchant is trying to pocket Salsa. She was quick hammered by Not_Mafia and enchant in Newbie 2042 during D2 and they passed that shit off as a lolhammer that enchant rode into F3 and won for mafia.

not gonna fooling this time!

be fooled* (still don't know if it's the right grammar

)

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:46 am**

In post 197, Prism wrote:Yo, not a dirty flaker, late here and will read through tomorrow.

Welcome!

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:47 am**

In post 199, fferyllt wrote:allez

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:52 am**

In post 150, Enchant wrote:
In post 139, floo wrote:
In post 136, Spartan117 wrote: Found this sus to even insinuate it is somewhat serious a vote this early on with such little discussion, unless ofc this is to obtain a reaction and read responses.
Right, as I explained I said it was "partially serious" to avoid seeming scummy / too random.
I probably ask something nonsense, but really want.

Why you think placing votes suspicious? Do you really care how suspicious are you?

Of course explaining votes is good, but doing that and claiming you did that just to don't seem suspicious for that is really something strange.

Town supposed to push suspicious people, you know.

I second that. Not your vote but your explanation is suspicious : "

to avoid seeming scummy"

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:01 am**

In post 206, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 205, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 189, safebet222 wrote:If I didn't know any better, I'd think that enchant is trying to pocket Salsa. She was quick hammered by Not_Mafia and enchant in Newbie 2042 during D2 and they passed that shit off as a lolhammer that enchant rode into F3 and won for mafia.

not gonna fooling this time!

be fooled* (still don't know if it's the right grammar )

It is. Not going fooling would mean - well, no one says that.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:03 am**

In post 209, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 150, Enchant wrote:
In post 139, floo wrote:
In post 136, Spartan117 wrote: Found this sus to even insinuate it is somewhat serious a vote this early on with such little discussion, unless ofc this is to obtain a reaction and read responses.
Right, as I explained I said it was "partially serious" to avoid seeming scummy / too random.
I probably ask something nonsense, but really want.

Why you think placing votes suspicious? Do you really care how suspicious are you?

Of course explaining votes is good, but doing that and claiming you did that just to don't seem suspicious for that is really something strange.

Town supposed to push suspicious people, you know.

I second that. Not your vote but your explanation is suspicious : "
to avoid seeming scummy"

I third that.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:06 am**

VOTE: floo

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:11 am**

Btw, what is the difference between hammer and lolhammer?

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:12 am**

In post 213, Salsabil Faria wrote:
Btw, what is the difference between hammer and lolhammer?

hammer intended by most, and this is collective decision.
lolhammer is just because voter wanted to.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:17 am**

In post 212, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: floo

Very scummy vote imo, has been lurking around and posting but still yet to provide any sort of detailed reads of their own as if they are unable to because they know everyone is town. Here voting off the back of other peoples reads without providing any sort of breakdown as to why they actually think they are sus or bringing anything new to the table.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:20 am**

It is common practice to announce intent to hammer as a way of confirming consensus and allowing time for the target of the hammer to claim. When the hammer happens without the claim of intent, whether by accident or design, they call it a lolhammer.

What happened to you my dear Salsabil in 2042 was a quickhammer, when scum coordinate on a hammer without consent from the town. It is most often used in ELo.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:20 am**

In post 214, Enchant wrote:
In post 213, Salsabil Faria wrote:
Btw, what is the difference between hammer and lolhammer?
hammer intended by most, and this is collective decision.
lolhammer is just because voter wanted to.

Hammer is always done with a previous post of an intent to hammer giving the player time to claim their role or any other players to withdraw their vote if desired.

Lolhammer is done out of the blue with no prior warning and is typically either done by newb town or scum.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:23 am**

VOTE: Salsabil Faria

For being passive and fluffy

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:25 am**

In post 214, Enchant wrote:
In post 213, Salsabil Faria wrote:
Btw, what is the difference between hammer and lolhammer?
hammer intended by most, and this is collective decision.
lolhammer is just because voter wanted to.

Hmm... so the person who knows a word like lolhammer but don't know what SR indicates, seems like a LAMIST (Look At Me, I'm So Town) thing to me.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:26 am**

In post 216, safebet222 wrote:It is common practice to announce intent to hammer as a way of confirming consensus and allowing time for the target of the hammer to claim. When the hammer happens without the claim of intent, whether by accident or design, they call it a lolhammer.

What happened to you my dear Salsabil in 2042 was a quickhammer, when scum coordinate on a hammer without consent from the town. It is most often used in ELo.

Understood, thank you.

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:27 am**

In post 217, Spartan117 wrote:
In post 214, Enchant wrote:
In post 213, Salsabil Faria wrote:
Btw, what is the difference between hammer and lolhammer?
hammer intended by most, and this is collective decision.
lolhammer is just because voter wanted to.
Hammer is always done with a previous post of an intent to hammer giving the player time to claim their role or any other players to withdraw their vote if desired.

Lolhammer is done out of the blue with no prior warning and is typically either done by newb town or scum.

Thank you too

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:28 am**

In post 218, flow trap wrote:VOTE: Salsabil Faria

For being passive and fluffy

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:29 am**

In post 222, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 218, flow trap wrote:VOTE: Salsabil Faria

For being passive and fluffy

What don't you get?

Posted: **Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:46 am**

In post 223, flow trap wrote:
In post 222, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 218, flow trap wrote:VOTE: Salsabil Faria

For being passive and fluffy

What don't you get?

Like everything... your wagon was on E-1, but didn't get any response from you. You townread those people who voted you, and placed suspicions on those who didn't like the E-1 vote on you. And you already read people while being on page 4 only, like super fast! You also stated you're not a new player, so as an experienced one you should know that being super active/helpful doesn't necessarily indicate town, as well as being silent doesn't necessarily indicate scum. Generally, activity is the last resort to point someone as town/scum. A new player can read people at this early state base on the activeness but not an experienced player. Your suspicion on

esotericzoomer

for this reason doesn't make sense to me, also your vote on

Fredrick A Campbell

and the explanation after, also feel weird to me.

Mafiascum.net

Newbie 2051: Iceland! - End!