Mafiascum.net

In post 151, Andante wrote:Ivy feels too scared to voice reads, thinks the generic lines are enough to get by...

In post 153, Andante wrote:I mean, these are your lines in specific I hate. literally feels like textbook scum, feels very emotionless, trying to be "helpful" I see it all the time. You think lines like this will have people going "oh that's very pro towny" like, it feels like you are trying to coast... and I don't like it

Spoiler:

In post 94, Ivyeo wrote:

In post 93, choof wrote:

In post 90, geraintm wrote:so, 4 pages already that i can safely ignore.
this is what, game 2+2+1+1?

it worked so well in my last game i'm going to do the same this one. i am VT.
i should be probably add a sarcasm tag to that

weird post

Good Post

In post 114, Ivyeo wrote:

@MOD

Is the Highlight just the biggest wagon?

In post 130, Ivyeo wrote:

In post 122, Umlaut wrote:

In post 95, InsidiousLemons wrote:for the record, the day modifier is considered normal on MS, provided the role that it ap plies to is also considered normal.

I would be really surprised if this is true. What's your source?

Modifiers which are explicitly Normal for any alignment include:
Activated, Announcing, Ascetic, Backup (with or without primary role present), Bulletproof, Combined, Complex, Compulsive, Disloyal, Enabler (with or without primary role present), Indecisive, Informed, Lazy, Loud, Loyal, Macho, Multitasking, Neighbor, Ninja, Non-Consecutive Night, Personal, Roaming, Simple, Weak, X-Shot, any modifier restricting to a specific set of nights (e.g. Even/Odd Night, Night Specific, Novice)
Day is not listed, so it's not inheriently normal

In post 139, Ivyeo wrote:

In post 136, Umlaut wrote:

In post 133, choof wrote:

In post 130, Ivyeo wrote:Enabler (with or without primary role present)

what the fuck lmao

I don't actually see how this is wtf-worthy but then I've been hanging around long enough that maybe it's just Stockholm syndrome

In short, a role is either normal or it isn't, it doesn't depend on what other roles are in the game. So sure, you can have a normal game with two Millers, a Deputy, a Cop Enabler, and no Cop. It would be a terrible game but it would satisfy the strict definition of normal.

This is making me Giggle, idk why

In post 155, choof wrote:if we wanna talk about ppl with 0 interactions let's see if T3 has anything else
VOTE: T3

In post 187, bugspray wrote:

i dayvig osuka

In post 192, Umlaut wrote:

I dayroleblock bugspray

In post 186, bugspray wrote:VOTE: umlaut/vote] i absolutely don't understand the levels of logic in that argument agasint choof and it seems like there's stairs missihng and your brain leaped the gap without notigcing

It's like a one-sentence argument, what do you not understand?

In post 191, osuka wrote:

In post 118, Andante wrote:

In post 75, Anya wrote:

In post 73, Dunnstral wrote:No, that's just a general way of covering roles like neighbor and mason

idk we'll see it's just a feeling

i'll be on the lookout for secret communication though so you better use morse code to escape my introspection

Why does this feel like rolefishing. like, the game has just begun...

???????????????????

In post 195, Umlaut wrote:

In post 189, Anya wrote:was looking for those juicy cranberry reactions i think dunnstral's was slightly town

Can you elaborate on this?

In post 127, Umlaut wrote:I really dislike 102, partially because they should be

voting

Anya if they suspect her and aren't already voting someone better, but mostly because the "reasons" they're giving for a scummo vibe seem less like things that a person would

actually

expect more from scum and more like things a person would

imagine

being legitimate cause for a scumread.

• I don't like 102.
  
• Town!Choof should vote Anya if he actually thinks she's scummy. Choof wasn't (at that time) voting Anya. So maybe Choof isn't town!
  
• Town!Choof should have a real reason to think Anya is scummy. The reason Choof gave looks like a fake one. So maybe Choof isn't town!

In post 64, Dunnstral wrote:Also, that theory seems dumb anyway. Why do mafia need to communicate that they're rolecop/tracker/neighbors during the day, instead of night 1?

In post 70, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 69, Anya wrote:

In post 67, Dunnstral wrote:day roles but no day talk?

how do you know?

I mean, that's what you're saying you thought was a possibility.

I don't think the thinking makes sense for a first assumption

In post 209, Umlaut wrote:Town!Choof should vote Anya if

they

actually

think

she's scummy.

In post 201, osuka wrote:you're ACTUALLY saying a post asking the mod a question is a scumtell? this is hilarious

In post 216, Egix96 wrote:

In post 201, osuka wrote:you're ACTUALLY saying a post asking the mod a question is a scumtell? this is hilarious

I thought the point Andante was trying to make was that Ivyeo was making posts that, even if made with the intention of being helpful, did not really do much to advance the game.

In post 206, osuka wrote:so you're saying you're completely incapable of parsing a run-on sentence?

In post 209, Umlaut wrote:

In post 127, Umlaut wrote:I really dislike 102, partially because they should be

voting

Anya if they suspect her and aren't already voting someone better, but mostly because the "reasons" they're giving for a scummo vibe seem less like things that a person would

actually

expect more from scum and more like things a person would

imagine

being legitimate cause for a scumread.

This was the run-on bugspray is talking about. Allow me to explain further:

• I don't like 102.
  
• Town!Choof should vote Anya if he actually thinks she's scummy. Choof wasn't (at that time) voting Anya. So maybe Choof isn't town!
  
• Town!Choof should have a real reason to think Anya is scummy. The reason Choof gave looks like a fake one. So maybe Choof isn't town!

Now it's more than one sentence but maybe you can follow it better!


Pedit: Anya, I meant elaborate on Dunnstral being slightly town.

In post 205, bugspray wrote:what do you not understand?

In post 205, bugspray wrote:

In post 192, Umlaut wrote:what do you not understand?

its a run on