https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
That's the spirit!In post 202, Nero Cain wrote:we could just lynch you if you didn't feel like playing
like, I don't really understand why you'd join a game with the intention to not play unless you landed scum and lurking/coasting helps your faction.In post 204, VFP wrote:That's the spirit!In post 202, Nero Cain wrote:we could just lynch you if you didn't feel like playing
It was more of a joke at Osuka. He doesn't like me saying that.In post 207, Nero Cain wrote:like, I don't really understand why you'd join a game with the intention to not play unless you landed scum and lurking/coasting helps your faction.
true but does he do that with players that were also in that game? It's all WIFOM I guessIn post 208, T3 wrote:VFP had a similar opening line to summer meet, where they were scum.
DGB: theoryIn post 209, VFP wrote:It was more of a joke at Osuka. He doesn't like me saying that.In post 207, Nero Cain wrote:like, I don't really understand why you'd join a game with the intention to not play unless you landed scum and lurking/coasting helps your faction.
If you gave me more than 8 minutes to read the game that would be useful.
But I have now.
And I still don't understand how Dwlee is the leading wagon.
Your post 74 I agree with but not so much seeing anything else that seems bad.
So someone explain to me like I'm 5 why Dwlee or Peter Pan are a good choice here?
I don't read it that Dwlee is scum for denying DGB's theory.In post 213, T3 wrote:DGB: theory
Dwelee: no
peta: anyone who denies the theory is scum x10000
people: vote
Dweleeis somehow scum for trying to wriggle out of a lim by fake claiming pr.In post 214, VFP wrote:I don't read it that Dwlee is scum for denying DGB's theory.In post 213, T3 wrote:DGB: theory
Dwelee: no
peta: anyone who denies the theory is scum x10000
people: vote
Can you point to where I'm wrong?
well, most people are town reading DGB for it so a scum DGB could post that for town cred but the question is would scum make the risk of pushing an anti-town stance that no one in their right minds would agree with. eh, prob not. its p risky but I'm not of petas opinion where DGB would never ever in a million years post that as scum b/c I think scum absolutely could but I think occams says its prob just town that is frustrated.In post 212, VFP wrote:I'm not sure what scum DGB gains with that post.
This doesn't read like someone who's unhappy at Dwlee for not following DGB's plan. It seems to be more about how it was shut down and the reaction Dwlee given. I'm not saying I agree, but let's not read a story here.In post 67, petapan wrote:nevermind that i was the first one to engage dwlee and call him scum, my point is way less baking up dgb and ore that the way dwlee chose to engage and turn things into a pedantic argument about how not to play where he could make an "ideal" theoretical point about how "we shouldn't play it like mountainous" that glosses over what dgb is actually trying to say (we should emphasize dayplay and minimize decisions based on mechanical speculation, basic stuff). in the process he steers the conversation toward something non-game-advancing, that is, arguing about "well of course you should consider claims in a normal setup". and when i immediately jump him after that he responds not like someone who has genuine conviction in what he's arguing but cornered scum who doesn't know how to react
Maybe I'm just dumb here, but I still don't see it?In post 215, T3 wrote:Dweleeis somehow scum for trying to wriggle out of a lim by fake claiming pr.In post 214, VFP wrote:I don't read it that Dwlee is scum for denying DGB's theory.In post 213, T3 wrote:DGB: theory
Dwelee: no
peta: anyone who denies the theory is scum x10000
people: vote
Can you point to where I'm wrong?
Do you townread rathe?In post 206, Nero Cain wrote:I could always be wrong but I feel p strongly so lets say 70/30
T3 is being sarcastic. Titus floated the idea that I was scum planning to use a claim to coast through the strong playerlist and that was why I was opposed to DGB's plan.VFP wrote:Maybe I'm just dumb here, but I still don't see it?In post 215, T3 wrote:Dweleeis somehow scum for trying to wriggle out of a lim by fake claiming pr.In post 214, VFP wrote:I don't read it that Dwlee is scum for denying DGB's theory.In post 213, T3 wrote:DGB: theory
Dwelee: no
peta: anyone who denies the theory is scum x10000
people: vote
Can you point to where I'm wrong?
Yeah I guess there is something to gain and this explains better than what I was saying and on a better track.In post 216, Nero Cain wrote:well, most people are town reading DGB for it so a scum DGB could post that for town cred but the question is would scum make the risk of pushing an anti-town stance that no one in their right minds would agree with. eh, prob not. its p risky but I'm not of petas opinion where DGB would never ever in a million years post that as scum b/c I think scum absolutely could but I think occams says its prob just town that is frustrated.In post 212, VFP wrote:I'm not sure what scum DGB gains with that post.
this is what Titus said. Peta is basically arguing that he's beingIn post 215, T3 wrote:Dweleeis somehow scum for trying to wriggle out of a lim by fake claiming pr.
Ah okay, so that's irrelevant then as DGB's idea will never follow through in a large anyway.In post 219, Dwlee99 wrote:T3 is being sarcastic. Titus floated the idea that I was scum planning to use a claim to coast through the strong playerlist and that was why I was opposed to DGB's plan.