Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:17 pm
then why arent you voting me
Looking at my own meta that actualy makes sense. Townpoints to toog for this.In post 197, Toogeloo wrote:Naked votes, while generally terrible for information, are still generally NAI. In fact I'd argue, scum are more likely to make up a be excuse to apply a vote to avoid naked voting.
You weren't particularly similar, in my perception. Her posts pinged more. But regardless: why is me moving my vote from you to her suspect?In post 183, Toogeloo wrote:I think my top 3 should not be executed today.
I didn't find their reason for changing their vote off of me to be compelling since I was guilty of similar play. My reads are fluid however, and it should be noted that I have no read basis for spots 4-6 since there isn't enough to work with as of now.
Okay, why?In post 198, bugspray wrote:i unironically have some sr on datisi
Why does he get townpoints for a purely theory based statement?In post 203, T3 wrote:Looking at my own meta that actualy makes sense. Townpoints to toog for this.In post 197, Toogeloo wrote:Naked votes, while generally terrible for information, are still generally NAI. In fact I'd argue, scum are more likely to make up a be excuse to apply a vote to avoid naked voting.
I agreed with their train of thought. Toogs statement about scum not naked voting makes sense to me and I didn't realize before.In post 206, Retti wrote:Why does he get townpoints for a purely theory based statement?In post 203, T3 wrote:Looking at my own meta that actualy makes sense. Townpoints to toog for this.In post 197, Toogeloo wrote:Naked votes, while generally terrible for information, are still generally NAI. In fact I'd argue, scum are more likely to make up a be excuse to apply a vote to avoid naked voting.
Why did you dislike bugspray's naked voting if it's something you do yourself?
I disliked it because it came without an explanation and it didn't advance the game.In post 209, Retti wrote:Okay, but why did you dislike bugspray's naked voting?
Why didn't the thought occur to you if it's something you do yourself?
Uh, well yeah I can say, since I feel like this is fine to get out in the open.In post 103, Retti wrote:But in all seriousness, what were you hoping for, (if you don't mind saying)?
EBWOPIn post 214, Rhyme and Reason wrote:But anyway, if T3 had echoed any of these thoughts, it would have shownhewas having similar concerns to me with respect to the unhelpful flips.
Out of curiosity, what, if anything, do you think he's doing differently from what you'd expect from scum-him?In post 169, skitter30 wrote:I mean its weird but i'm not sure its enuf to call u scum over
Good post (?)In post 174, Toogeloo wrote:Skitter, these posts are coming off to me like you are being delicate with your wording.
Agree the answer from T3 was underwhelming. Understand the concern about the flips being unhelpful, but don't know that we need to full claim? Can just have everyone claim action results from the night prior. Don't necessarily need to reveal what other potions people may or may not have left.In post 214, Rhyme and Reason wrote:Uh, well yeah I can say, since I feel like this is fine to get out in the open.In post 103, Retti wrote:But in all seriousness, what were you hoping for, (if you don't mind saying)?
I myself was having a similar idea of massclaiming, for two reasons: (1) it makes sure that no info is lost since people's powers don't flip, and (2) most powers are one-shot so the power is distributed and scum can't take out all our power by focusing on a few PR's.
But, Mena ended up convincing me that a D2 massclaim is better, since schadd surely included a contingency for a massclaim, and since the potions owned by the person killed N1 hardly matter anyway. Saving massclaim until D2 allows investigatives to claim their info without fear of interference.
But anyway, if T3 had echoed any of these thoughts, it would have shown be was having similar concerns to me with respect to the unhelpful flips. Alas, it was just "herp derp I wonder if the setup is breakable"
-Reason
He tends to be like ~smoother~ as scum sort ofIn post 218, Rhyme and Reason wrote:Out of curiosity, what, if anything, do you think he's doing differently from what you'd expect from scum-him?In post 169, skitter30 wrote:I mean its weird but i'm not sure its enuf to call u scum over
-Reason