Mafiascum.net

In post 191, ben dover123 wrote:

In post 189, T3 wrote:

In post 143, Pan Smierc wrote:can we not policy them and waste a mislim

TMI?

Wait wtf

bc pan said "mislim" as opposed to "lim"
scum knowing why will flip town

In post 150, Pan Smierc wrote:I kinda did that as a manipulative tactic to force votes onto me instead who can be read as a fake scumslip so people stop lazily policy voting a slot that clearly will eventualy be forced one way or another to post game advancing content hopefully

I can't read

(4): DArby, mozamis, Klick, Save The Dragons
(3): Thynhith, T3, cool cookie
(1): Pan Smierc
(1): Egix96

(2): ben dover123, IOnlyAskWhy

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to eliminate.

: (expired on 2021-11-13 17:00:00)

Joint moderator ISO

Oh
Then Pan is still town fsure.

In post 197, Klick wrote:I don't think his route here as scum is 'take really easy stance on Why', I think that has really limited potential as a scum position here atm. I also think if I'm wrong on this there's a pretty good chance we'll get him later.

mozamis reads as really genuine in his solving and I'm gelling with a lot of his takes

Meh it's true that StD doesn't seem to have a agenda, he's just super hard on policying Why which doesn't seem like a scum course of action.

Don't really agree with the mozamis read though.

Edit: I mean that StD doesn't seem to be setting up any other elims either so he's kinda weird that way. A good weird though.

In post 202, lendunistus wrote:

Mini Normal 2248 Official Vote Count - 1.4

IOnlyAskWhy

(4): DArby, mozamis, Klick, Save The Dragons

[E -2]

DArby

(3): Thynhith, T3, cool cookie

Save The Dragons

(1): Pan Smierc

cool cookie

(1): Egix96

Not Voting

(2): ben dover123, IOnlyAskWhy

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to eliminate.

Deadline

: (expired on 2021-11-13 17:00:00)

Why?

In post 198, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 185, Klick wrote:You really like the word 'lazy'
You also didn't answer my question

I didn't answer your question because i dont disagree with you on that front. I just think its a very unholistic way to approach teh game to be like "ZOMG ANNOYING GIMMICK GET IT OUT FIRST"

In most instances I'd basically agree with you. But with Why's gimmick we are getting essentially a guarantee of a contentless slot, and that's the point where it's no longer 'annoying' but instead 'not playing the game'

There is also a fair amount of bias against the gimmick on my part for making the game less fun, and I don't feel particularly bad about valuing that over the most optimal method of scumhunting. That's Why's problem, not mine.

Ben dover and T3 are the townreads I'd put money on atm

In most instances you rand town but this time you randed scum*
Fixed your overexplaination for you.

In post 204, ben dover123 wrote:

In post 197, Klick wrote:I don't think his route here as scum is 'take really easy stance on Why', I think that has really limited potential as a scum position here atm. I also think if I'm wrong on this there's a pretty good chance we'll get him later.

mozamis reads as really genuine in his solving and I'm gelling with a lot of his takes

Meh it's true that StD doesn't seem to have a agenda, he's just super hard on policying Why which doesn't seem like a scum course of action.

Don't really agree with the mozamis read though.

in practice that kind of thing is usually nai

In post 209, Pan Smierc wrote:In most instances you rand town but this time you randed scum*
Fixed your overexplaination for you.

Sure I guess I'll just stop engaging with you

I like ben and klick for town.

Pan could be scum for TMI on why.

T3 seems okay but I've been fooled by him before

Dont really have a strong read on other people

In post 212, Save The Dragons wrote:I like ben and klick for town.

Pan could be scum for TMI on why.

T3 seems okay but I've been fooled by him before

Dont really have a strong read on other people

Why's your vote on why over me then?

and no no one is towny for pushing a policy on a slot not producing game advancing content(mod please fucking prod the slot)
What is actaully scummy though is intentionally immediately trying to vote out that slot when you claim to have options elsewhere for scum that are readable slots.

I like how you made up a reason to justify your vote on me that's cute

In post 216, lendunistus wrote:

Not_Mafia replaces IOnlyAskWhy.

Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

I’ll have something actually productive to say this afternoon. I’m at work now but wanted to skim.

In post 215, Save The Dragons wrote:I like how you made up a reason to justify your vote on me that's cute

Whats made up?

In post 216, lendunistus wrote:

Not_Mafia replaces IOnlyAskWhy.

Actually readable pog

In post 220, Not_Mafia wrote:

S

U

P

C

L

O

D

P

O

L

E

S

,

I

'

M

T

H

E

J

E

S

T

E

R

A

N

D

I

'

M

H

E

R

E

T

O

T

R

O

L

L

T

H

E

F

E

C

A

L

M

A

T

T

E

R

O

U

T

O

F

T

H

I

S

G

A

M

E

!

VOTE: Not_Mafia

Why?