Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 6:22 am
Imagine saying that, then winning the game as an actual mafia rolecop. I don't have much experience, so I don't believe I can read people on day 1. Can't say causing chaos on day 1 makes someone scum, since that day matters the least. From where I'm standing everyone is just tying themselves into a knot. Guess I'll vote, just because everyone else is.In post 92, furtiveglance wrote:I knew for sure it wasn't your role, don't worry about that (I'm Rolecop not Goon)In post 89, Somnus wrote:Actually regretting spoiling that it’s based on post count now instead of letting you think it was based on your current alignment. A blown opportunity on my part.
That's fair. You shouldn't rely on other people's meta reads on each other. Making your own impressions is important! However, other people briefly discussing it may serve as a pointer to get started on reading someone. Both ways are equally appropriate, but I wouldn't call any of them more scummy than the other. They're simply different.In post 189, BigTerp wrote:Like I've already said, it's not at all how I'm use to playing this game. There was and has been a lot of talk about previous games, and I now understand that's a tactic, strategy, etc for many here. Which is obviously fine. I'm just not comfortable relying on others interpretations of how a particular player is playing this game compared to previous ones. I prefer to draw my own conclusions on how everyone is currently playing. I know day 1 there is little to go on, but that's why I try to find something different or odd for me to latch into early.In post 183, Mr Turtle wrote:I'm questioning the conclusion BigTerp got in post 108.
Confusion is a tool that can be used to town's benefit. While mafia may use confusion to manipulate town to some extent, mafia doesn't like too much chaos. The more confusing the thread gets, the more room there is for scum to slip as they aren't prepared for the confusion. The mafia relies that things follow their agenda and if there is no structure, it's hard for them to fit in.
Oftentimes a quiet, structured or stagnant game means that mafia is in control of the thread. If mafia were close to being caught, they'd try to use chaos and confusion to get out of it. Obviously, if nothing confusing or actionable is happening, mafia is perfectly content with their position in the game and that's a bad sign for town.
I don't think joking or meta reads have helped mafia, really. If anything, they've helped town. Joke posts are often relaxed and authentic, something which can be harder for scum to fake. Talking about a previous games can help contextualize, to those of us who haven't played or spectated those games, about who has meta reads on each other or who has radically changed their playstyle since their last game (possibly indicating an alignment shift).
As far as the confusion goes, apparently I'm the only one it causes it for, LOL!! But I disagree that confusion is better for town versus Mafia. If everyone is scrambling it's easier for mafia to nudge the votes in the direction they want without being noticed. If things are running smoothly yet votes but where Mafia wants them, it's harder for them to make that vote shift unnoticed.
I'm liking your breakdown of the game so far. You seem to belooking at posts thoroughly and providing good conversation about those posts. Feels very town like to me.
What do you mean that everyone is tying themselves into a knot?In post 201, PlmPestPlaY wrote:Imagine saying that, then winning the game as an actual mafia rolecop. I don't have much experience, so I don't believe I can read people on day 1. Can't say causing chaos on day 1 makes someone scum, since that day matters the least. From where I'm standing everyone is just tying themselves into a knot. Guess I'll vote, just because everyone else is.In post 92, furtiveglance wrote:I knew for sure it wasn't your role, don't worry about that (I'm Rolecop not Goon)In post 89, Somnus wrote:Actually regretting spoiling that it’s based on post count now instead of letting you think it was based on your current alignment. A blown opportunity on my part.
VOTE: Somnus
Oh no. Get well soon!In post 196, TTTT wrote:Just FYI
I'm sick sick sick
been up all night puking my guts out
not thinking at my peak today
hoping tomorrow is better and I'll get back in this
Are you talking to me or someone else?In post 204, marcistar wrote:Does anyone seem scummy to you?
I honestly don't have much of a read either way on Aliannas.In post 198, marcistar wrote:Yes :>In post 188, BigTerp wrote:Was your post "no, r u?" when asked if you were town just a joke post?
Maybe Aliannas scum..? What do you think about them?
Is this vote random? You called out Furtive for claiming a role then voted Somnus. Odd.In post 201, PlmPestPlaY wrote:Imagine saying that, then winning the game as an actual mafia rolecop. I don't have much experience, so I don't believe I can read people on day 1. Can't say causing chaos on day 1 makes someone scum, since that day matters the least. From where I'm standing everyone is just tying themselves into a knot. Guess I'll vote, just because everyone else is.In post 92, furtiveglance wrote:I knew for sure it wasn't your role, don't worry about that (I'm Rolecop not Goon)In post 89, Somnus wrote:Actually regretting spoiling that it’s based on post count now instead of letting you think it was based on your current alignment. A blown opportunity on my part.
VOTE: Somnus
WAIT OOPS-In post 205, Mr Turtle wrote:Are you talking to me or someone else?In post 204, marcistar wrote:Does anyone seem scummy to you?
Do you have reads on everybody else?In post 206, BigTerp wrote:I honestly don't have much of a read either way on Aliannas.
I like being vague because if i turn out to be wrong i can just be like "ahahaha" and laugh it off easier than going in full force I would.In post 206, BigTerp wrote:You seem to be making vague posts and asking vague questions. That might just be your play style, but if you're scum, could be a way to show you're staying active and trying to find Mafia. Why have you yet to vote?
I meant to reply to this earlier but didn't get round to it.In post 169, marcistar wrote:
I find furtiveglance scummy yes.
10 feels VERY forced. While 18 also in a way feels a bit forced, but in the way of I think they're just inviting useless conversation to seem busy.
81, 117 just honestly feels like excuses and setting himself up so that he'll be able to get away with defending a possible scum wagon in the future by being like "OMG GUYS WTF I GAVE WARNING!!!". I agree with TTTTs post about it as well.
82 this feels like an honest question to me considering the follow through so it seems a bit like a slip imo.
97 Where was his vote before this? Because this seems WEIRD and standouts from his other posts when I was reading.![]()
For me, I read parts of 127 in a nervous defensive sort of tone. Thats how I think its read, it seems like he doesn't want TTTT to get on his case for some reason. Whats he scared of?![]()
![]()
131 I had something to say about this but now i'm tired so you guys can guess first
This is what we call an OMGUS vote. I’m glad my prof vote at least brought you out from zero contributions.In post 201, PlmPestPlaY wrote:Imagine saying that, then winning the game as an actual mafia rolecop. I don't have much experience, so I don't believe I can read people on day 1. Can't say causing chaos on day 1 makes someone scum, since that day matters the least. From where I'm standing everyone is just tying themselves into a knot. Guess I'll vote, just because everyone else is.In post 92, furtiveglance wrote:I knew for sure it wasn't your role, don't worry about that (I'm Rolecop not Goon)In post 89, Somnus wrote:Actually regretting spoiling that it’s based on post count now instead of letting you think it was based on your current alignment. A blown opportunity on my part.
VOTE: Somnus
I do too. I know joke posts can come from either alignment, but your first two pages of posts are very unlikely to come from newbie scum. You’ve been very transparent.In post 199, Alianna wrote:I townread Alianna.
Curious as to the reason for the unvote though. Was furtive’s post convincing to you?
Somnus didn't make the posts Mr Turtle made - do you mean gut feeling again?
Mostly.In post 217, furtiveglance wrote:Somnus didn't make the posts Mr Turtle made - do you mean gut feeling again?
Beware, this player is a known bamboozler as mafia.In post 218, Alianna wrote:Mostly.In post 217, furtiveglance wrote:Somnus didn't make the posts Mr Turtle made - do you mean gut feeling again?
I will keep that in mind.In post 219, furtiveglance wrote:Beware, this player is a known bamboozler as mafia.In post 218, Alianna wrote:Mostly.In post 217, furtiveglance wrote:Somnus didn't make the posts Mr Turtle made - do you mean gut feeling again?
With the way this game has gone, I’m going to be accused of calling myself a bamboozler in this post.In post 219, furtiveglance wrote:Beware, this player is a known bamboozler as mafia.In post 218, Alianna wrote:Mostly.In post 217, furtiveglance wrote:Somnus didn't make the posts Mr Turtle made - do you mean gut feeling again?