Mafiascum.net

In post 203, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Actually if I’m right about Titus, Enchant’s vote on her would be town indicative for him because he usually jumps on players who push his buddies, so I oppose Enchant wagon.

In post 202, Titus wrote:Yup. Hydra no dissonant reads. Only wants a prior wagoned slot and the player who solved the game.

I tr everyone but you Vander and Huerta. Porkens and scr are weak trs though.

In the uber rare event the hydra is town, that tells me plenty about votes today.

In post 205, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:

In post 202, Titus wrote:Yup. Hydra no dissonant reads. Only wants a prior wagoned slot and the player who solved the game.

I tr everyone but you Vander and Huerta. Porkens and scr are weak trs though.

In the uber rare event the hydra is town, that tells me plenty about votes today.

Zero questions. Zero analysis. Just tears.

I find it extremely difficult to believe we’re wrong on you with this bad a take, because I would think it would be extremely obvious to town!you by now that we are, so this post doesn’t change anything for me at all.

In post 204, Titus wrote:

In post 203, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Actually if I’m right about Titus, Enchant’s vote on her would be town indicative for him because he usually jumps on players who push his buddies, so I oppose Enchant wagon.

What are your reads if I am town?

And if you persist in the charade?

In post 207, Titus wrote:Zero questions. Zero analysis. Just tears.

In post 210, Titus wrote:I didn't say Huerta was scum. I doubt they are. I just don't have enough to declare a townread yet.

Vander is poking around the sidelines. His post on you v me was very bad. He didn't say we were t v t. He said it was possible. His post was designed to flip me first before flipping you. It made it clear he really doesn't want to flip you, yet he doesn't want to call you town.

The charade is pushing me as scum.

You STILL have no analysis. No thought process beyond someone voting you is scum.

In post 214, Porkens wrote:Defend against what?

In post 216, Porkens wrote:How to defend against people voting me?

In post 218, Enchant wrote:You should burn them at night

In post 217, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 216, Porkens wrote:How to defend against people voting me?

I can't help you with that one

In post 220, Porkens wrote:

In post 217, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 216, Porkens wrote:How to defend against people voting me?

I can't help you with that one

Yep, hard to defend against what basically amount to naked votes.

In post 110, Titus wrote:

In post 84, furtiveglance wrote:Herta, Porkens, Titus and Vanderscamp has 2 Arsonists.

I'll give you Vanderscamp as possible scum here. Hard to explain but I don't like their posturing and they were on the fast Ircher wagon. Feels like they want anyone and are floating.

In post 112, Titus wrote:

In post 95, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:

In post 93, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:

In post 77, Porkens wrote:

In post 65, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:BE ALERT! VOTE: DON DRAPER EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED. BE FIRE SAFE.

Nooooo why back off the e-1? That was good pressure stride

SO DOES THIS POST MAKE PORKENS TREE GOOD OR BAD?

I can’t say, I’m currently nullreading them but I don’t like Ircher being at E-1. In SS’ game, a player was put to e-1 and self-hammered on d1, they were town. Early day 1 flashwagons more than not tend to be town. I don’t see any reason to rush the vote regardless.

Although I had no intent on voting Ircher, I feel like we got info from it. Regardless of Ircher's alignment, likely one scum in it.

In post 113, Titus wrote:

In post 101, Vanderscamp wrote:I think Titus is scummier than Don and they're pretty clearly not together. But I could def see this as town vs town

Yeah, Vanderscamp is the partner.

Sign seal deliver.

Willing to do either today.