It seems this game that you often make rash assumptions from things (e.g. the whole detect thing, and thinking Tammy was talking about Mastin when it was actually TTH) and then become uncooperative with anyone who becomes frustrated by you doing this, not really considering why they would be frustrated with you I guess.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 3:57 pm
by Tammy
↑Espeonage wrote:And you wonder why I'm having issues with you.
I realize apparently this is personal for some reason and I'm trying to get a teammate to switch with me.
Please stop saying [REDACTED] by the way.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 3:57 pm
by singersigner
My cat is perpetuating my alcoholism!
First he's in my lap, invoking the "cat rule."
Then he gets up, leans his head against my arm and tries to fall asleep upright.
Then I told him he's the reason I couldn't get another glass of wine and he left.
Page 51. It's getting harder and harder to keep reading the back and forths, but I only have like 12-13 more pages before i'm caught up to where I was. Same reads apply. Wishing we weren't penalized for being wrong with policy lynches.
↑Espeonage wrote:And you wonder why I'm having issues with you.
I realize apparently this is personal for some reason and I'm trying to get a teammate to switch with me.
Please stop saying [REDACTED] by the way.
It isn't. It's a trend I've seen myself having with certain reads when it's on a slot that has particular gravitas.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:20 pm
by Espeonage
Tammy I am going to reiterate. It is nothing personal with you. It's a thing with the way I read people and how I prioritize slots in large games.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:20 pm
by Espeonage
Please don't leave.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:22 pm
by Espeonage
↑DeasVail wrote:It seems this game that you often make rash assumptions from things (e.g. the whole detect thing, and thinking Tammy was talking about Mastin when it was actually TTH) and then become uncooperative with anyone who becomes frustrated by you doing this, not really considering why they would be frustrated with you I guess.
Ok fair enough, but how is that an intentional experimental style? What would be the point?
↑DeasVail wrote:It seems this game that you often make rash assumptions from things (e.g. the whole detect thing, and thinking Tammy was talking about Mastin when it was actually TTH) and then become uncooperative with anyone who becomes frustrated by you doing this, not really considering why they would be frustrated with you I guess.
Ok fair enough, but how is that an intentional experimental style? What would be the point?
Well that's entirely why I think you're town, but sometimes it seems beyond what I'd expect from you and it makes me less certain.
I guess the point for scum would be to be universally townread yet never a likely nightkill target (so no one worries that you're still alive), but I agree that this is a stretch.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:28 pm
by Espeonage
I never a nightkill target anyway.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:51 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:14 pm
by singersigner
Ok, seeing as I have 10 pages to go and a few glasses of wine in, I would like to formally ask Titus and Tammy to post about half as much as they are posting! If each of you posted on even the third highest level of posters (which is about 120 posts I believe), then the game would be about 15 pages shorter! WOAH. I also want to say that I'm not discouraging posting in general, just that with the quantity of posts, this caters to scum heavily, and I'd really like to 1. NOT do that, because this game shouldn't be any harder for town to find scum within 81 pages as it is, and 2. allow for others to respond and engage first. It's really hard to get an accurate feel for who's hiding and who's not when everyone feels overshadowed by the two of you. Don't get me wrong, ILY! but this catch up was really hard and slow going and I was trying to do my team justice by not doing my normal "half-hearted" catchup of only ISOing the mod and any relevant events, while also keeping up with everything else going on (there have been *count it* 14 pages! since I replaced in two days ago--ok I'll take away the two-ish pages I was personally engaging with Titus et all to get a better feel of the game).
That being said, I'm not going to fight for a lynch, as I hardly ever do on D1, seeing as I take the UT approach of WE DON'T KNOW ANYTHING! I've stated my preferences, and will vote as soon as I read the last ten pages, and then we'll go from there! Thanks for being patient with me guez! <3
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:21 pm
by singersigner
fffff
I really hate long paragraphy posts but I've got a pretty good buzz going and can't be fucked to edit. -_-
ALSO. FFERY. Regfan has been bugging me all night to figure out how to paraphrase the things he's like you to address so here goes:
With regards to Titus...I actually just addressed this! The post count/questioning have been interpreted to be slightly anti-town and he doesn't like her Bane0ing stance...count you elaborate on a non meta-based read of her?
Aronis...he likes #887, 14433, and 1372
Bulb...I'm gunna edit this out because I don't really agree with the town read so much!
Marquis...was paranoid, now he's not...super enlightening...
Mastin...had a town read, then didn't, now he does again, particularly the DV scum read!
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:22 pm
by singersigner
Um scratch that, you asked him, not the other way around. >_>
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:30 pm
by fferyllt
I'm confused.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:34 pm
by singersigner
I believe you asked for clirification on the bolded?
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:41 pm
by fferyllt
refgan did, I thought. I butchered a couple quote tags.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:10 pm
by singersigner
um...I thgink you asked him to explain a few of his reads?
...
this is awkward...
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 8:38 pm
by vezokpiraka
vote espe
This is a good wagon.
@mastin: if you are town and yoi defended scum so hard they couldn't be lynch you will feel my wrath.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 8:58 pm
by Espeonage
ok what
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 2:08 am
by Titus
Back from DnD, reading now.
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 2:16 am
by Titus
↑singersigner wrote:Titus what do you think of TTH now that she's "back" from your pressure? You postulated that she could be either a threat or a benefit to town...have you been able to parse through her now that 80% of her posts have been made in the last two days?
Preview Edit:
omgtammyandIaresynched
I like what I see since I got back. They are not a huge townread but I am not wanting to lynch there today. TTH would be a compromise lynch.
I really didn't care for Espy with his handling of Tammy's wuestions.
VOTE: Espy
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 3:38 am
by fferyllt
↑singersigner wrote:um...I thgink you asked him to explain a few of his reads?
...
this is awkward...
I only asked you about his titus read.
This feels like pretty weak reasoning for scumreading her.
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 3:48 am
by Titus
I am not even sure what the post count thing even is TBH and him disagreeing with me on baning is just wrong. I bit my tongue to play nice because everyone else wanted a bane. Scum were highly unlikely to bane themselves. Now they know Bulba's sign. They magically all likely got on Bulba's wagon or pushed it yesterday and zilch today. The longer Bulba stays alive, the more likely we are to mislynch him (assuming I am correct that Bulba is town) but if we clear him, scum can kill him when they want. The fact you cannot see my position, even if you disagree with it is scummy. The fact you didn't bring this up until after you were asked for a scumread reason is just outright bad.