Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:48 pm
In post 1978, Vaxkiller wrote:Conspiracy theory:
Xtom rescinded their replacement request because the entire scum team replaced out, but he likes the new scum team replacements.
VOTE: Vax
In post 1978, Vaxkiller wrote:Conspiracy theory:
Xtom rescinded their replacement request because the entire scum team replaced out, but he likes the new scum team replacements.
VOTE: Vax
Naaah.In post 1978, Vaxkiller wrote:Conspiracy theory:
Xtom rescinded their replacement request because the entire scum team replaced out, but he likes the new scum team replacements.
She’s being replaced.In post 2001, TheBrie wrote:Naaah.In post 1978, Vaxkiller wrote:Conspiracy theory:
Xtom rescinded their replacement request because the entire scum team replaced out, but he likes the new scum team replacements.
Prodge post here. Busy weekend, life, stupid stuff.
I don't think I mentioned Vax in my lasts reads (or lack of them) post. I'd been uncomfortable with him earlier, but I liked his tone when he was interecting with Varsoon. (Though the timing was bad. Lately, not so great.
Also, what happened to Theta? We said Theta would be self resolving, but with so much else going on... I don't know what scum will do if Theta is town, and I'm worried about why Theta has been inactive. Probably lack of interest, but Theta, if you're town, do come be helpful.
He makes a post that tin foiling about the entire scumteam being replaced and then he votes sheep. How does this make any sense to you at all?In post 2002, TheBrie wrote:Actually on Vax, he seems kinda careless and guileless, but his votes are all of the place, and he's not hanging onto consistent thoughts. Which still doesn't mean scum. Bother. i was oping I'd find a better reason to vote him. Better than Nancy, Ausuka and oh, someone else, also voting him.
And looking deeper his hard TRing Flavour, then changing to voting him does make sense, but Flavour wagon wasn't going anywhere, so he's gone somewhere more useful.
Nancy, you quoted two posts from Vax, when you voted him, but you didn't give an explanation. Why do you think he's scum? It's not because he's voting your precious sheep?
(Granted, the post hwere he vote's sheep is one of his worst.)
Vax, why are you voting sheep? And why do you think Gamma's vote on you was bad? (Other than it being on you, and you being firmly convinced of your own innocence. (Or faking it. Take your pick.))
Gamma is actually doing stuff to push the game forward. Trying to get people to vote (Which I'm still not) and I think he's town.
In post 218, TheBrie wrote:Two pages ago I was rather liking Varsoon, but now, not so much. His reasoning for not especially hunting in the hood seemed sounds, to me, the stuff about multiball throwing everything offf... Sure he's allowed to dislike multiball, but I'd think he should know how to scum hunt in multiball by now, so it seems rather stupid what he's saying.
You expected the game to be balanced?In post 192, Varsoon wrote:Furthermore, it's PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to balance against the swing inherit in a multiball setup.
I have NEVER seen it done.
I'm liking sheepsaysmeep.
Oh, and does anyone know what Wagonomics is about? His whole wagon value thing just seems weird. Like he's busy playing his own game of randomness on top of the main game. It doesn't give a read either way, but still weird.
Helpless and hungry, lowly, afraid
Wrapped in the chill of midwinter;
Comes now among us, born into poverty’s embrace,
New life for the world
In post 339, TheBrie wrote:Me neither. Wagonomics is just weird. I should probably do meta on him.In post 336, Varsoon wrote:Can I get someone to be my vote/wagon broker?
I am not good at playing the markets.
Though I also think sheep is town (Not great town though), Cheeky's townread on porkens was based on one post which only contained a single vote, that lined up with what Cheeky was thinking at time. That's a NAI post, possibly leaning slightly to town, as Porkens did add any kind of excuse and scum tend to that sometimes. Cheeky being right on Porkens seems like dumb luck.In post 308, Nancy Drew 39 wrote: Collapsed to shorten the post.Spoiler:
Cheeky townread Porkens, who was sheep’s predessor and I think sheep is town here.
Hark how the bells, sweet silver bells, all seem to say, throw cares away. Christmas is here, bringing good cheer, to young and old, meek and the bold.
Actually, did I misconstrue your post? You meant better reasons to vote Vax, not that his voters were scum? If so, sorry about that and scumread on you retracted.In post 2002, TheBrie wrote:Actually on Vax, he seems kinda careless and guileless, but his votes are all of the place, and he's not hanging onto consistent thoughts. Which still doesn't mean scum. Bother. i was oping I'd find a better reason to vote him. Better than Nancy, Ausuka and oh, someone else, also voting him.
And looking deeper his hard TRing Flavour, then changing to voting him does make sense, but Flavour wagon wasn't going anywhere, so he's gone somewhere more useful.
Nancy, you quoted two posts from Vax, when you voted him, but you didn't give an explanation. Why do you think he's scum? It's not because he's voting your precious sheep?
(Granted, the post hwere he vote's sheep is one of his worst.)
Vax, why are you voting sheep? And why do you think Gamma's vote on you was bad? (Other than it being on you, and you being firmly convinced of your own innocence. (Or faking it. Take your pick.))
Gamma is actually doing stuff to push the game forward. Trying to get people to vote (Which I'm still not) and I think he's town.
thats not your faultIn post 2008, singletonking wrote:Sorry for constant prodging, I can't really get into this game
That’s a town case on me. I don’t sound like scum when I am scum.In post 2020, Kokichi Oma wrote:Flavor are you scum. Sounds like it
VOTE: GammaIn post 2023, Jingle wrote:I'd vote Gamma over Vax here, tbh. Not really digging either wagon tho.
Add Ausuka to my scumz list.