With 7 students present, it takes 4 to form a majority. Day two ends in (expired on 2020-12-04 06:12:25).
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:59 am
by MURDERCAT
Also though tracy is super quiet and I want people to agree that if we don't get something from that slot soon we are 100% yeeting it
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:59 am
by MURDERCAT
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:01 pm
by Purple Heart
In post 2001, MURDERCAT wrote:Also though tracy is super quiet and I want people to agree that if we don't get something from that slot soon we are 100% yeeting it
are you suggesting that them being quiet is intentional or?
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:03 pm
by Purple Heart
And what
are we just murdering tracy based on the logic of murdering OutWorldER?
In post 638, Gamma Emerald wrote:idk about flea as scum, kinda thought they've been towny
but beyond that your reads and your thoughts seem good on a "yeah this makes sense as a thought process" level
What do you think has been towny from them? Honestly its possible I just missed something
A certain level of inquisitiveness I've seen. It's probably me who's being surface-level here honestly tho
This feels like how I approach light townvibes a lot. People's posts give me a good feeling, but it's hard to pinpoint and I doubt myself.
I think I probably won't be able to find you if you are scum so i decided to just act as if you are town. It gives me a starting point for the day at least
probably a town mindset (for MCat specifically)
I agree, good take
In post 659, Gamma Emerald wrote:ftr my scumvibes on dk were waning before they replaced out, ali has reduced those vibes to a speck practically
Kind of a silly reason, but talking about vibes as a "speck" feels like a genuine way to approach a read.
In post 748, Gamma Emerald wrote:That Purple Heart post, after fully reading it, feels towny. The base sentiments are NAI, but it seems unfiltered in a way that makes it towny
Scum would probably post similar sentiments in a way that comes off as frustrated, that one seems legit distraught.
Looks he's trying to really sort between fake vs. real emotion
In post 887, Infinity 324 wrote:Gamma I liked uncrowned’s engagement with me on the last page, what do you think
In post 889, Gamma Emerald wrote:
@Infinity eh I don’t know about all that, I’m forming my own thoughts here rn
Idk how to explain this, but this felt super +town to me. Gamma does like to do his own thing, and his response of being mildly annoyed with me kinda getting in the way of him pushing on uncrowned felt very genuine.
In post 1350, Gamma Emerald wrote:I remember you making to tsow comment before PH came in
But you didn’t cling to that take so it’s not suspicious at all probably.
He keeps noticing things like this and not using them to push anything. I don't see why scum would do that.
In post 1592, Uncrowned wrote:I'd first like to apologize for being a sook D1 and for how I interacted with Noora. I don't come into games intending to cause issues. I had a stressful couple of days and shouldn't have overreacted and tried to use the game to vent my frustration. That was wrong.
Now for the game. Flea is an interesting selection. Surface level NKA points to Purple potentially wanting that slot dead judging by end of day interactions between the two of them, I think? Will have to peep into that ISO a little more.
Kinda wanna TR this. Feel like scum in this position might be more contrite? There'd be more spectacle about apologizing about bringing RL in imo.
I agree and this feels like town trying to explain a gut read
In post 1723, MURDERCAT wrote:why so down on gamma? Didn't you vote him onto the council?
no, the only person i voted for council was you. well other than myself. gamma emerald behaviour change with purple heart entrance feels not right to me.
again, bad timing. I had been operating on some meta re: my Dk read and had started to rethink it just before Dk replaced out
Consistent progression from 659 and 744. He clearly had koba's meta at the back of his mind but didn't say too much about it. This is a strong towntell for me.
In post 1929, Gamma Emerald wrote:the lazy part comes from you also writing off purple/noraa as TvT like you did, as well as saying you "solved" the game. I KNOW you didn't solve it, so you're just lazily tossing out a set of reads that make SOME sense and calling it a legitimate solve. So that should also answer why I can think your read on me is reasonable but also think you're being lazy, too. The "change" is pretty much me focusing more on your read on me vs. you're overall solve.
This and the whole interaction with uncrowned felt pretty genuine
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:33 pm
by Uncrowned
Tracy and OWER definitely haven't played the same outside of lower activity levels.
Idk maybe maybe not I feel bad about dating that if someone is legitimately just busy
But they were in thread like 20 minutes before I accused them
i mean the answer to the question is no because given how active they are in the game in general, its impossible to tell how meaningful it is.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:40 pm
by Purple Heart
tracy should solve
I agree with you
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:41 pm
by Purple Heart
tbh when I read your post I thought that tracy being quiet was being interpretted as being scum indicative. I don't think thats what you meant on re-read.
In post 109, Flea The Magician wrote:Nah this is like 3 of 3 I'm in with Taylor, this is bog standard taylor at this point Pretty sure MCs response is standard too ^_^
by nai i meant not alignment indicative; as in, i have seen taylor swift troll in a similar manner as both alignments.
This is towny. When i see people like take a behavior of someone else and label it NAI its like usually town motivated.
In post 349, DkKoba wrote:
tracy - doesnt seem like a strong scumhunty sort at all. was sus at the start from their early mechposting but the way they reacted to the pressure was town.
In post 409, DkKoba wrote:u know im not understanding much of what ur sayign but im still getting good vibes from the posts themselves
LOL koba is not this naive
In post 483, Purple Heart wrote:
tracy flick - Their interactions with people seem really natural and to me it feels as if they're really trying to figure out the motivations of the other players.
In post 1744, Purple Heart wrote:The way I see Tracy, I wanted you to track her.
My mindset on the slot is I can think of a lot of reasons why she's scum.
- She basically got a free pass and no one really talked about the slot or thought about it.
- Hammer can be a scum hammer.
However, there is somethings I can say that make me feel like Tracy could be town, and this is the most important thing ot me.
From Tracy's POV, I don't think she's really aligned with anyone?
Like she really comes across as just doing her own thing to me.
has only been active in relation to a few conversations right now, but I'm still not too convinced that the non-guilty was a way to innocent her slot for two reasons:
1)
She wasn't a slot that caught attention and nobody really discussed her hammer throughout Twilight, despite how flippant it seemed.
2)
Very few slots took issue with
Gamma's
council but slots as
Noraa/Uncrowned
weren't convinced of the reads there, if
Gamma/Tracy
were true, what does it serve
Gamma
to try and innocent
Tracy
when the thread's progression is to question counciling him in the first place?
With the plan to track
Tracy
and make the assumption that a non-guilty was planned to innocent her via scum-in-council feels like confbias.
My initial take with
Tracy
being a townlean was that she seemed unconcerned with the POVs that the plist had with her and she was transparent with her thought processes via meta and mechanics. The chart she created, while not so clear, did not feel something I'd seen anybody do before? I'm going ISO map
Tracy
and evaluate her more critically.
In post 2004, Purple Heart wrote:And what
are we just murdering tracy based on the logic of murdering OutWorldER?
This is all of the slot's posting on tracy. It's not good. Lim this when tracy flips scum.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:43 pm
by Uncrowned
OWER had snippets of genuine interactions and moments of town/scumhunting. Tracy talked mechanics, had a read on OWER and nothing else really worth noting? Compare their ISOs and they're definitely not the same.
That's a weird comparison to make from Purple tbh. I'm not sure how you could SR OWER and not feel the need to SR Tracy here. That doesn't feel right. If you could get on OWER for "not wanting to play the game" but now you're shading a potential Tracy elim who has been similar in that regard but worse everywhere else? Doesn't make sense.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:43 pm
by MURDERCAT
In post 2015, Purple Heart wrote:tbh when I read your post I thought that tracy being quiet was being interpretted as being scum indicative. I don't think thats what you meant on re-read.
Less that and more like we should be forcing tracy to say stuff because if she is scum she is being allowed to coast
Pretty sure MCs response is standard too ^_^