Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:47 pm
Ur at T-1 so uh PFFTIn post 1990, Annie Edison wrote:Your read on me is trash and I expect better. You know damn well I have no room to maneuver this game as scum on either fucking side.
Ur at T-1 so uh PFFTIn post 1990, Annie Edison wrote:Your read on me is trash and I expect better. You know damn well I have no room to maneuver this game as scum on either fucking side.
does it even matter how many scum are where?In post 2001, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Brian Skies - why do you not want town to be sent over? With little information like this, scum can completely abuse getting switched over.
yes, as brian pointed out if no scum exist in one thread by night 2 we get a whole thread confirmed town.In post 2002, upside down sinkhole wrote:does it even matter how many scum are where?In post 2001, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Brian Skies - why do you not want town to be sent over? With little information like this, scum can completely abuse getting switched over.
Nah, if there’s a scum in the thread, it doesn’t matter. Scum would have 5 others in the other thread, so they’d be able to control stuff.In post 1998, Firebringer wrote:WHAT A GOOD POINT FROM MY SCUMFRIEND BRIAN SKIES.In post 1081, Brian Skies wrote:Flavor Leaf is missing the rule where if one thread loses all their scum by Night 2 or before, then that entire thread becomes modconfirmed town.
So while yes scum can stack one side, that lone wolf side is at heavy risk of blowing it for their team.
this is why you are friends with ur enemies people. They have good insights and are very smart.
Yes.In post 2002, upside down sinkhole wrote:does it even matter how many scum are where?In post 2001, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Brian Skies - why do you not want town to be sent over? With little information like this, scum can completely abuse getting switched over.
i thought u said they were 4-2 going or 5-1In post 2004, Flavor Leaf wrote:Nah, if there’s a scum in the thread, it doesn’t matter. Scum would have 5 others in the other thread, so they’d be able to control stuff.In post 1998, Firebringer wrote:WHAT A GOOD POINT FROM MY SCUMFRIEND BRIAN SKIES.In post 1081, Brian Skies wrote:Flavor Leaf is missing the rule where if one thread loses all their scum by Night 2 or before, then that entire thread becomes modconfirmed town.
So while yes scum can stack one side, that lone wolf side is at heavy risk of blowing it for their team.
this is why you are friends with ur enemies people. They have good insights and are very smart.
Also, you missed the part I said they could be 3-3 trying to get to the 4-2.
I don’t think they’re anywhere near in danger of having that happen.
In post 1976, Flavor Leaf wrote:Even if it’s 3-3 now, getting sent over creates that 4-2.
Cuz they want to get sent over?In post 2008, Firebringer wrote:if they want to go to 4-2 why not just set themselves up that wy to begin with. That doesnt make sense
but how do we confirm that?In post 2003, Firebringer wrote:yes, as brian pointed out if no scum exist in one thread by night 2 we get a whole thread confirmed town.In post 2002, upside down sinkhole wrote:does it even matter how many scum are where?In post 2001, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Brian Skies - why do you not want town to be sent over? With little information like this, scum can completely abuse getting switched over.
That is important.
This.In post 2013, skitter30 wrote:And honestly i think you're overvaluing how much scum wants to create scum-heavy threads to begin with
In post 1094, unwnd wrote:In post 1091, unwnd wrote:In post 1072, unwnd wrote:And what makes someone town for simply agreeing? That's the worst dichotomy you could possibly make
I don't get why you keep referring it to town consensus in that moment lolI really want this answered and I'm not pleased with a weak ass voteIn post 1070, unwnd wrote:Again, 4-5 people sheeping someone's hairbrained scheme is not town consensus
Beaming this over
This exchange unsettles me and it's not even the vote on me
I disagree. That possibility seems super remote.In post 2003, Firebringer wrote:yes, as brian pointed out if no scum exist in one thread by night 2 we get a whole thread confirmed town.
That is important.
If they did the 4-2 to begin with, they would have an unbalanced game and a balanced game, which is can be extremely telling. I don’t necessarily think scum thought about it that much. 3-3 creates balance, and is more shiftable because you don’t limit yourself to only having 2 votes.In post 2010, Firebringer wrote:okay but now ur confusing me on why they originally decided 3-3 now are like 4-2 when they could have done that to begin with
unlikely yes, but i still think its important to scum thinking.In post 2017, Something_Smart wrote:I disagree. That possibility seems super remote.In post 2003, Firebringer wrote:yes, as brian pointed out if no scum exist in one thread by night 2 we get a whole thread confirmed town.
That is important.