Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 4:00 am
#2000
chaos, what do you think of alchemist?
chaos, what do you think of alchemist?
This makes sense actuallyIn post 1961, Datisi wrote:so, at this part of the game, chaos became the leading wagon. umlaut was posting at the time. he gave zero shits about chaos getting run up. if a partner had been getting run up, a partner that people (is anyone other than alch actually?) are claiming is so important to the scumteam, you'd think umlaut would be doing... something?
also all of luke/math/alch are voting chaos here and uhh. don't like it one bit.
Yeah this feels legitIn post 1965, Titus wrote:We would have one scum in Ari Gamma Koba, likely not Gamma.
One in Luke Math Alch, likely not Math
Umlaut off.
So because you don’t think scum would wagon together, your suspect is someone who was also on that wagon? WHAT?In post 1969, Datisi wrote:because they can let the townie burn *anyway*, and then the next day they can go "wow gee guys you voted meg? like i told you we should vote omega hehe" and then you get another misyeet.
i do think it's somewhat unlikely luke/alch are scum together because blatant wagoning together is blatant, but that just makes me think math is more scum and i really need explanation for why he's apparently town by play
how u gonna say "likely not" at the 2 likley remaining scumIn post 1965, Titus wrote:We would have one scum in Ari Gamma Koba, likely not Gamma.
One in Luke Math Alch, likely not Math
Umlaut off.
Ftr I think Math has a point about hammers getting overlooked, generally those who get it to the E-1 point get looked at more I thinkIn post 1989, MathBlade wrote:Also the whoever hammered would be under heat tomorrow is just historically not true.
If you believe Chaos was a PR with a guilty (I don’t) then no, the person hammering wouldn’t be pressured at all.
Furthermore it’s usually not hammers that get pressured. That’s a myth.
Are you looking to expand the elimination pool?In post 2009, DkKoba wrote:how u gonna say "likely not" at the 2 likley remaining scumIn post 1965, Titus wrote:We would have one scum in Ari Gamma Koba, likely not Gamma.
One in Luke Math Alch, likely not Math
Umlaut off.
Meg wagon formed after Chaos though, so in this case it would make more sense to look at the Meg wagon.In post 1966, Datisi wrote:i've heard a different vca theory once. if town starts wagoning other town and there's a pure wagon on a townie, it's in scum's interest to make a counterwagon on another townie.
not saying i'm working from that assumption to scumread the trio, but i will need much more evidence that scum are spread out across both wagons than "it would make sense if this were the case".
Hold on and I’ll pull out a couple posts that I think pretty much show Math is Town.In post 1969, Datisi wrote:because they can let the townie burn *anyway*, and then the next day they can go "wow gee guys you voted meg? like i told you we should vote omega hehe" and then you get another misyeet.
i do think it's somewhat unlikely luke/alch are scum together because blatant wagoning together is blatant, but that just makes me think math is more scum and i really need explanation for why he's apparently town by play
I don't see Luke + Alch leading a wagon together on Chaos when Meg is an option.In post 2015, Aristeia wrote:Why can't the team just be Alchemist - Lukewarm?
So Math made this vote at a weird time as some kind of reaction test but then immediately decided it wasn’t a good idea and unvoted. I just don’t see scum doing this and immediately reconsidering. Plus from their posts I think it’s been pretty clear Math has been trying to figure things out and I have him up there with you in my top Townreads.In post 1465, MathBlade wrote:VOTE: Unvote
Nevermind bad idea.
Datisi I will make you a deal. I will vote Umlaut right now for the low low price of “told you so” post game.
Because you vote me at the start of the day. And if you are town, and did investigate me, I know you would have drawn an innocent.
Imma be real with you chief, it doesn’t matter what alignment I am I don’t really like being the hammer vote. Even as scum in this situation I wouldn’t be rushing to hammer.In post 1975, MathBlade wrote:We know Meg is town here at this point.In post 605, tris wrote:
Want to assume I am scum incorrectly here? Why don’t I hammer?
Same with Alch and Luke.
These are the questions that have to be answered with narrative.
In post 2011, Titus wrote:His ChaosOmega read could be sucking up to Math.
This is correct. Some threads just have players who talk more.In post 2020, Alchemist21 wrote:All of page 80 is just wtf.
Math it really isn’t likely that any scum would have hammered there because, like what was said before, it would have cut discussion early and people would have been mad at the hammerer.
from my 1 game sample i witnessed this is trueIn post 2019, Alchemist21 wrote:Imma be real with you chief, it doesn’t matter what alignment I am I don’t really like being the hammer vote. Even as scum in this situation I wouldn’t be rushing to hammer.In post 1975, MathBlade wrote:We know Meg is town here at this point.In post 605, tris wrote:
Want to assume I am scum incorrectly here? Why don’t I hammer?
Same with Alch and Luke.
These are the questions that have to be answered with narrative.
How can you read all of what i said and conclude thatIn post 2012, Titus wrote:Are you looking to expand the elimination pool?In post 2009, DkKoba wrote:how u gonna say "likely not" at the 2 likley remaining scumIn post 1965, Titus wrote:We would have one scum in Ari Gamma Koba, likely not Gamma.
One in Luke Math Alch, likely not Math
Umlaut off.