Mafiascum.net

In post 1998, Eiralox wrote:i think N_M is probably not present. i mean, with this level of teat wobblin' one thinks theyd be here

I genuinely can't understand why NM is allowed into games, but I've given up on trying to figure it out. At this point it's either him or Vivax. Vivax failing to address... Well, directed to him so far today (and then jumping from Gera to NM, while still saying Corwin and I are scum) reeks of trying to dodge because he knows the case isn't there.

In post 2000, Crescent wrote:

In post 1998, Eiralox wrote:i think N_M is probably not present. i mean, with this level of teat wobblin' one thinks theyd be here

I genuinely can't understand why NM is allowed into games, but I've given up on trying to figure it out. At this point it's either him or Vivax. Vivax failing to address... Well,

anything whatsoever

directed to him so far today (and then jumping from Gera to NM, while still saying Corwin and I are scum) reeks of trying to dodge because he knows the case isn't there.

You should understand why NM is allowed into games. I'm his new substitute. We should find a better mislaunch, Crescent.

Speaking of dodging..

In post 2002, Crescent wrote:Speaking of dodging..

You're just mad I stole the portrait he intended to give to you.
But it's not too late.

i mean vivax never you voted gibus and gibus only voted vivax start d3. not enuff but i'm throwing it out there.

In post 2004, Eiralox wrote:i mean vivax never you voted gibus and gibus only voted vivax start d3. not enuff but i'm throwing it out there.

You're wrong, look:

VOTE: gibus

only other person who hasn;t voted vivax is crescent

In post 2005, Vivax wrote:

In post 2004, Eiralox wrote:i mean vivax never you voted gibus and gibus only voted vivax start d3. not enuff but i'm throwing it out there.

You're wrong, look:

VOTE: gibus

cool cool so ur trusting elsa on this?

Oh also we kind of have to vote one of those two because numbers actually.

If Vivax/NM are both town, numerically speaking town has pretty much already lost. Two players actively refusing to play the game in eight means 6 left (2 scum) when it takes 5 to vote off. It's basically 4 town vs. 4 scum at that point. All scum would need is a single town vote on another town at any time to lock the game up.

only other person who hasn't voted gibus is Not_MAfia

In post 2006, Eiralox wrote:only other person who hasn;t voted vivax is crescent

I've been tempted to fix that since this morning!

In post 2008, Crescent wrote:Oh also we kind of have to vote one of those two because numbers actually.

If Vivax/NM are both town, numerically speaking town has pretty much already lost. Two players actively refusing to play the game in eight means 6 left (2 scum) when it takes 5 to vote off. It's basically 4 town vs. 4 scum at that point. All scum would need is a single town vote on another town at any time to lock the game up.

I'm thinking N_M is afk at this point. Other than that right now i'm in pure investigative mode so such concerns are supererogatory.

In post 2007, Eiralox wrote:

In post 2005, Vivax wrote:

In post 2004, Eiralox wrote:i mean vivax never you voted gibus and gibus only voted vivax start d3. not enuff but i'm throwing it out there.

You're wrong, look:

VOTE: gibus

cool cool so ur trusting elsa on this?

They have my full support.

In post 2011, Eiralox wrote:

In post 2008, Crescent wrote:Oh also we kind of have to vote one of those two because numbers actually.

If Vivax/NM are both town, numerically speaking town has pretty much already lost. Two players actively refusing to play the game in eight means 6 left (2 scum) when it takes 5 to vote off. It's basically 4 town vs. 4 scum at that point. All scum would need is a single town vote on another town at any time to lock the game up.

I'm thinking N_M is afk at this point. Other than that right now i'm in pure investigative mode so such concerns are supererogatory.

The thing I'm worried about right now from the actually active players is Corwin. He doesn't seem to understand that his constant expletive-laden personal attacks are the most anti-town behavior anyone's engaged in all game. It's become impossible for me to engage with him and he genuinely does not seem to care what my alignment is.

Since I think he's town, I don't know if it's even possible to vote off a scum so long as he continues to hate vote me.

And you only do this after you make me angry enough to vote you? That just feels like distancing.

In post 2014, Elsa Jay wrote:And you only do this after you make me angry enough to vote you? That just feels like distancing.

I think ultimately this game was just sunk by having multiple troll players.

It isn't worth getting angry anymore - It's exactly what they want.

In post 2014, Elsa Jay wrote:And you only do this after you make me angry enough to vote you? That just feels like distancing.

Do you need to be angry with someone to vote for them?

I mean I'm a troll too sometimes but I can also take the game seriously.

Do you think if we get rid of Corwin's hard on for getting rid of Vivax he'll do the townie thing and help us day 4? Cuz if Vivax flips red I promise I won't do anymore scum Cres theories and we can just end this stupid cycle.

Vivax wrote:

In post 2014, Elsa Jay wrote:And you only do this after you make me angry enough to vote you? That just feels like distancing.

Do you need to be angry with someone to vote for them?

It helps.

In post 2017, Elsa Jay wrote:I mean I'm a troll too sometimes but I can also take the game seriously.

Do you think if we get rid of Corwin's hard on for getting rid of Vivax he'll do the townie thing and help us day 4? Cuz if Vivax flips red I promise I won't do anymore scum Cres theories and we can just end this stupid cycle.

Vivax wrote:

In post 2014, Elsa Jay wrote:And you only do this after you make me angry enough to vote you? That just feels like distancing.

Do you need to be angry with someone to vote for them?

It helps.

Corwin was voting for me in the last vote update.

Did this change? I was very clear I'm not reading his posts.

I'm using the activity overview to see who's posting, and then using ISOs to read said posts. I see him posting I'm out. I'm done with him. He has no interest in "the townie thing".

Corwin (when he isn't bothering you I guess) had wanted Vivax dead for over a week now and hasn't changed. If we start a wagon there he says he'll follow us there.

We pray Vivax is the scum between Vivax/NM and then town has enough votes to still win day 4.

well there's still many options on the table

In post 2020, Elsa Jay wrote:Corwin (when he isn't bothering you I guess) had wanted Vivax dead for over a week now and hasn't changed. If we start a wagon there he says he'll follow us there.

We pray Vivax is the scum between Vivax/NM and then town has enough votes to still win day 4.

Do you remember why he went after Vivax originally?

For voting him.

Why did he go after Owen?

For voting him.

Who's the third person who voted him day 1? Me.


He's still voting solely on the basis of "this person voted for me day 1 and must die". I'm not sure there's any reasoning with that if he can't see how anti-town his behavior has consistently been.

In post 2021, Eiralox wrote:well there's still many options on the table

The game is virtually unwinnable if Vivax/NM are both town is the issue, just by the numbers.

In post 2023, Crescent wrote:

In post 2021, Eiralox wrote:well there's still many options on the table

The game is virtually unwinnable if Vivax/NM are both town is the issue, just by the numbers.

what i'm saying is i'm gonna use my time to analyze, and right now N_M and Vivax aren't my only options.