Mafiascum.net

Math, just because you say something repeatedly doesn't mean the majority of town agree with you. Two slots flat out disagreed with you publicly.

I still am trying to work with you and I have a scum pool which I have been begging for your thoughts on.

I wish you would have listened before 7 claims....

In post 1759, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1757, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I followed Titus last night and she performed an investigative action

I'm assuming she got some kind of inno on Frogster cuz she said this:

In post 1588, Titus wrote:

In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.

Which really makes sense only if you're TPR and you're crumbing your night 1 inno - therefore she should be town.

Cool. I am a voyeur.

I find 3 ITPRs very rare.

No one visited Cape90. I doubt three ITPRs exist so to me one of you or Titus are scum.

Oh, I see. That's a lot of town investigatives and I don't like that too much. I will read up to see what develops from there

In post 1998, Titus wrote:Math, just because you say something repeatedly doesn't mean the majority of town agree with you. Two slots flat out disagreed with you publicly.

I still am trying to work with you and I have a scum pool which I have been begging for your thoughts on.

I wish you would have listened before 7 claims....

And I have said several times I disagree with it.

You repeatedly asking won’t make me magically agree.

And I have been listening

You stop me from solving mechanically

You stop me from solving by not talking about reads

So far as I am concerned you’re the problem.

In post 1777, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1776, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1770, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1768, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I'm pretty sure we're all town and I didn't need to claim anything to figure this out

I think we did because 5 town confirmed in 16P is not normal.

It’s a golden rule of normals that you don’t have that many confirms.

How do we have 5 town confirmed?

We don't even have 5 confirmed role claims let alone alignments.

Pedit:

That crumb doesn't float with me. I think pooky is trying to phish Titus.

It works for me.

It’s between Pooky and Titus anyway.

Pooky says Titus visited Frog.

Titus said she didn’t.

Bus drivers and redirects aren’t normal.

So 1v1 time

OH
Then why did you even make the comment in the first place about there being 3 ITPRs?

In post 1780, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1779, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:what I didnt say Titus visited Frog

I said I followed Titus

Followers are not trackers

Rip I got them backwards

I was so excited I thought I caught a scum

nvm

In post 2001, Cape90 wrote:

In post 1777, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1776, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1770, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1768, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I'm pretty sure we're all town and I didn't need to claim anything to figure this out

I think we did because 5 town confirmed in 16P is not normal.

It’s a golden rule of normals that you don’t have that many confirms.

How do we have 5 town confirmed?

We don't even have 5 confirmed role claims let alone alignments.

Pedit:

That crumb doesn't float with me. I think pooky is trying to phish Titus.

It works for me.

It’s between Pooky and Titus anyway.

Pooky says Titus visited Frog.

Titus said she didn’t.

Bus drivers and redirects aren’t normal.

So 1v1 time

OH
Then why did you even make the comment in the first place about there being 3 ITPRs?

I would be one
Pooky would be 2
Titus would be three.

This could easily be avoided if you’d talk with me like my opinions matter

Instead of continually just saying no.

If anyone would give me a single reason besides “vibes” or someone else I don’t tunnel BGC.

There's an open invitation to discuss my scumpool in 1954. I'm not stopping you.

Your mechanics were just flat out wrong and proscum. Period. There isn't an in depth discussion of a plan that requires massive coordination. There is no need for an alternate plan when the best plan is to leave people to their own devices.

The leader should get the best of people, not shove an opinion down throats.

In post 2005, Titus wrote:There's an open invitation to discuss my scumpool in 1954. I'm not stopping you.

Your mechanics were just flat out wrong and proscum. Period. There isn't an in depth discussion of a plan that requires massive coordination. There is no need for an alternate plan when the best plan is to leave people to their own devices.

The leader should get the best of people, not shove an opinion down throats.

So do it yourself

I have discussed several times with Frogger why I disagree with the pool you’ve crafted together.

And they are right and protown

You’re the only one besides Enchant and Toog who expressed any doubt and then when asked a reason said none

I am using my role in the absolute best way I can for town.

You insisting it’s proscum doesn’t make you right.

Everyone else agreed with me

I am sick and tired of being treated like I am worthless and not worth an explanation.

You’re stating it’s proscum like it’s settled

I explained we could confirm like 3+ people as invests they can’t back out of. Protown

You’re just not explaining Jack nor shit

Try explaining what my suggestion is Titus.

Try it.

I don’t think you can.

In post 1789, Toogeloo wrote:I don't buy all these claims, because I also am an investigative.

plot twist: I am the only non-investigative

Titus is sure using a lot of mech arguments

You can't complain that you can't discuss reads with me and then claim you discussed them with Frogsterking. I'd like to have a productive discussion with you, but that seems impossible. You're relying on things that are untrue.

For example, you completely forgot about Marcistar objecting.

In post 1975, marcistar wrote:if anyone else wants to do it thats fine but i wont

You still present this as the majority of town agreeing still.

I do value your thoughts but I have to be working with someone who is listening and open to dialogue.

We've been over and over your thoughts and you dismiss any different opinion as reasonless.

Your idea: Everyone target the same target. You voyeur them.

In post 2010, Titus wrote:You can't complain that you can't discuss reads with me and then claim you discussed them with Frogsterking. I'd like to have a productive discussion with you, but that seems impossible. You're relying on things that are untrue.

For example, you completely forgot about Marcistar objecting.

In post 1975, marcistar wrote:if anyone else wants to do it thats fine but i wont

You still present this as the majority of town agreeing still.

I do value your thoughts but I have to be working with someone who is listening and open to dialogue.

We've been over and over your thoughts and you dismiss any different opinion as reasonless.

Your idea: Everyone target the same target. You voyeur them.

That’s only part of it.

How can you reject an idea you can’t even summarize?

Because I feel the majority of town does

But soon as I talk with anyone who might agree with me you pop in and interrupt and spam.

And I don’t think you are otherwise you’d go look at that VCA I did with Frogger.

StD literally imho cannot be scum for that reason.

If you were actually interested you’d go look at what I already said about your supposed team

But you’re not. You’re more interested in proving me wrong than actually being right.

K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

*shrug* Apparently you have no interest in actually talking about anything other than your plan which we've gone over (p.s. you asked for a summary of it) or your vca, which we have also been over. The minute you want to massively coordinate roles like that, I am out. I love VCA but I don't treat it as a catch all on D1.

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

Let's lim Pooky. BcG will sort himself as a bodyguard claim.

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

VOTE: Frogger

That’s two claims you’re disputing. With clear obvious crumbs.

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

In post 2016, Titus wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

Let's lim Pooky. BcG will sort himself as a bodyguard claim.

No.

We are not elimming any invest with a clear and obvious crumb

They will sort themselves out with info

In post 1865, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wtf r u even talking about I literally didnt want to claim my investigation result on titus mathblade is the one who made me actually out what the result was because he thought it would help break the game open

I was just claiming that I thought Titus was inno with no details attached because I thought there was a good chance this game is lots of town investigative roles and no protective PRs

this whole I'm fishing Titus thing is literally random horseshit you decided to pull out of your ass

this theory is pretty interesting

In post 2018, Titus wrote:

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

Then why did you push for them constantly despite me telling you no?

Like you make no sense

In post 2019, MathBlade wrote:No.

We are not elimming any invest with a clear and obvious crumb

Are you going to stomp your feet and put your fingers in your ears? It's clear to me that you don't have the support to stop anything.