Mafiascum.net

So feel free to tell me what a Sottyrulez town flip tells the town about you, Kise, Jason, and BT.

^ That one is for nost.

↑ sottyrulez wrote:I see you've given up actually making arguments for us being scum.

... Yeah okay bro.

↑ sottyrulez wrote:So feel free to tell me what a Sottyrulez town flip tells the town about you, Kise, Jason, and BT.

... He was obviously referring to the scenario in which you flip scum. This feels really awkward considering you're not on the brink of a lynch.

↑ kuribo wrote:@Ben and everyone else worried about me mindfucking them: any scum worth a damn could mindfuck town. I'm just more open about it. Besides. This is different. I'm actually hoping to get lynched rather than kise. I'm effectively betting my presence in this game on my town read on him.

I get the mind fucking... And I really don't want to be agonizing over this later days (which I'm sure I will...oh well)... the wanting to sacrifice over Kise makes no sense from my pov to come from town. Never in a gagillion years would I sacrifice to save a doc. Docs are a shitty PR. And I don't get how you possible have such a confident read on him.

Anywhose BT>SAD..

I'd way prefer a CDB or Nost lynch then either BT or SAD... doesn't seem possible, I'll be around all deadline in an out.. at work, obviously atm.

Like, it's kind of a slightly desperate post that town like to flip do. And you're not that likely to flip at all.

↑ BT wrote:

↑ sottyrulez wrote:So feel free to tell me what a Sottyrulez town flip tells the town about you, Kise, Jason, and BT.

... He was obviously referring to the scenario in which you flip scum. This feels really awkward considering you're not on the brink of a lynch.

I know right, it's almost as if I think he should be and have been saying as much all day.

ebwop: town likely to flip do

↑ BT wrote:

↑ sottyrulez wrote:So feel free to tell me what a Sottyrulez town flip tells the town about you, Kise, Jason, and BT.

... He was obviously referring to the scenario in which you flip scum. This feels really awkward considering you're not on the brink of a lynch.

Because that's the only scenario you should fucking consider when you're arguing an

God please tell me you're both scum. You can't possibly be this bad.

Oh, and I guess the information gathered from a hypothetical sotty town lynch is not going to be addressed by nost. My mouth is still wide open from both of them brushing that one off.

↑ sottyrulez wrote:Oh, and I guess the information gathered from a hypothetical sotty town lynch is not going to be addressed by nost. My mouth is still wide open from both of them brushing that one off.

Yeah so I have no idea how Town aren't seeing you repeatedly put words into mine/other's mouths, for example in this case pretending that what BT said was what I'd said. *Shrugs*. I didn't say we should lynch you as an information lynch I said, for other players, hence why I started with "pssst town", if the choice is between those 4 wagons and you then at the very least (though I obviously think you're scum so aren't justifying -->MY<-- vote that way) we'd get info from it in a way we don't get with other wagons.

↑ Nostredeus wrote:

↑ sottyrulez wrote:Oh, and I guess the information gathered from a hypothetical sotty town lynch is not going to be addressed by nost. My mouth is still wide open from both of them brushing that one off.

Yeah so I have no idea how Town aren't seeing you repeatedly put words into mine/other's mouths, for example in this case pretending that what BT said was what I'd said. *Shrugs*. I didn't say we should lynch you as an information lynch I said, for other players, hence why I started with "pssst town", if the choice is between those 4 wagons and you then at the very least (though I obviously think you're scum so aren't justifying -->MY<-- vote that way) we'd get info from it in a way we don't get with other wagons.

You didn't say that?

↑ Nostredeus wrote:

I literally think scum is chilling out and watching town eat itself today, it happens, I get that, but really we could at least lynch scotty

and get a decent chunk of information out of it.

My mouth is still wide open.

You realise the first quote explains the problem you have with the second right? Like are you trying to convince people for me?

I just read that particular post again.

*You said you weren't arguing that we were a good information lynch.

*You then go on to argue about how we'd be a good information lynch.

My

God.

Nos: if scum is watching town eat itself, then who are the scum?

Also do you not see how that same thing could apply to you?

Also please bus BT.

Also where the fuck is zone face

Re: ZONEACE: If you run a member search on him, you'll see he's posted elsewhere while putting up excuses in this thread. ~. Zar

↑ sottyrulez wrote:I just read that particular post again.

*You said you weren't arguing that we were a good information lynch.

*You then go on to argue about how we'd be a good information lynch.

My

God.

Yeah I think, like before, it's pretty clear that my point has been made. I even used arrows to help you avoid this confusion, you're being intentionally obtuse, you're scum.

↑ Nostredeus wrote:

↑ sottyrulez wrote:I just read that particular post again.

*You said you weren't arguing that we were a good information lynch.

*You then go on to argue about how we'd be a good information lynch.

My

God.

Yeah I think, like before, it's pretty clear that my point has been made. I even used arrows to help you avoid this confusion, you're being intentionally obtuse, you're scum.

Oh so because YOUR vote isn't on the basis of us being a good information lynch, you don't have to explain to everyone else you're how we'd be a good information lynch?

Got it.

↑ Nostredeus wrote:

↑ sottyrulez wrote:I just read that particular post again.

*You said you weren't arguing that we were a good information lynch.

*You then go on to argue about how we'd be a good information lynch.

My

God.

Yeah I think, like before, it's pretty clear that my point has been made. I even used arrows to help you avoid this confusion, you're being intentionally obtuse, you're scum.

Oh so because YOUR vote isn't on the basis of us being a good information lynch, you don't have to explain to everyone else you're how we'd be a good information lynch?

Got it.

I can't believe I even have to argue this but...

↑ BT wrote:

↑ sottyrulez wrote:So feel free to tell me what a Sottyrulez town flip tells the town about you, Kise, Jason, and BT.

... He was obviously referring to the scenario in which you flip scum. This feels really awkward considering you're not on the brink of a lynch.

When you're making any kind of argument for an information lynch, (setting aside the semantics of whether nost is arguing it as justification for his own vote or to get other votes on us.) it should be clear what kind of information you're looking to gain from either flip, not just the flip you're assuming you're going to get.

Nos, you can keep trying to play it cool by ignoring it when I call you BT's scum buddy, but that won't make it any less true.

not on BT or SAD needs to get on ONE.

↑ kuribo wrote:Nos, you can keep trying to play it cool by ignoring it when I call you BT's scum buddy, but that won't make it any less true.

*Shrugs* The Westboro Baptist Church says mental shit too, I don't spend much time chatting to them about that though either.

NOST!?!?!? There's 24 hours to a deadline and noone is interested in lynching sotty.

Time to compromise. Between BT and SAD who would you rather see live???

Seriously... pretend to understand good town play.