Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:15 am
words
Did you look up what the word "substantiate" means?In post 2012, likeabauss wrote:Rank has NEVER subbed out on a D1 of a game with me, ever. Here, recently, we hydra'd and drew a scum role. He was MIA for the first couple days and I got into a rhythm without him. He didn't want to ruin the rhythm and so he basically had 3 posts all game. He talked about not reading the role PM to avoid knowing our scum mates. He didn't read/post in the QT to avoid the top of mind awareness of associations/disassociations. He wasn't worried about letting me down as hydra partner, he was worried about letting the team down. He knew the game was tight, he knew we had to go to the end game, and he wasn't confident in our ability to get there if we drew any extra heat. He doesn't like the lying/hiding and knew I was on a good course, so he backed me up with his town skills.
So much this.In post 2017, Cephrir wrote:I believe we are so massively incompetent that neither the flip nor night actions will resolve our general stupidity, but we should still lynch over nolynch on principle.In post 2016, yessiree wrote:I believe we are competent enough to make the decision without info from flip and night action
Bro head here, sorry to disappoint. AP's not caught up on the game; he's taken a bit of a mafia break for ~reasons~. He should be back and caught up some time during day 2. Either you can wait for him, or you'll have to pick AP out on his writing style. He was hydra'd with mastin in that game, which should make it pretty easy to tell which is which.In post 2028, likeabauss wrote:@AP head of FratBros... In Shadows/Lights: Were any of the lengthy posts yours? If yes, can you point me to a couple? NOT SIGNING POSTS MAKES HYDRA PLAY META DIVING A BITCH. Or is there a trick to picking you out of a hydra?
Still hesitant to lynch scum, but if I continue this hardline I'm a guaranteed lynch tomorrow.
Sakura is either scum or town that I'm white knighting for towncred.
I wish we would lynch town instead of my scumbuddy.
l2sarcasmIn post 2017, Cephrir wrote:I believe we are so massively incompetent that neither the flip nor night actions will resolve our general stupidity, but we should still lynch over nolynch on principle.In post 2016, yessiree wrote:I believe we are competent enough to make the decision without info from flip and night action
Still not Varsoon.In post 2027, likeabauss wrote:You are Varsoon. I knew it. Are you here? Can we chat?
Rank's not even here to defend himself. Its pretty bullshit that you, amongst others, are demanding I substantiate a read that I've openly stated I'm avoiding getting too deep into. Its an injustice to a player I respect to air out his play and methods without him having an opportunity to refute/discuss/obfuscate. Seriously.In post 2030, Angry Frat BROs wrote:Did you look up what the word "substantiate" means?In post 2012, likeabauss wrote:Rank has NEVER subbed out on a D1 of a game with me, ever. Here, recently, we hydra'd and drew a scum role. He was MIA for the first couple days and I got into a rhythm without him. He didn't want to ruin the rhythm and so he basically had 3 posts all game. He talked about not reading the role PM to avoid knowing our scum mates. He didn't read/post in the QT to avoid the top of mind awareness of associations/disassociations. He wasn't worried about letting me down as hydra partner, he was worried about letting the team down. He knew the game was tight, he knew we had to go to the end game, and he wasn't confident in our ability to get there if we drew any extra heat. He doesn't like the lying/hiding and knew I was on a good course, so he backed me up with his town skills.
Because this is the first post you've made that's substantiated your case.
Thank you.In post 2026, Cabd wrote:If shit is faked ill know tomorrow.
I think your case on Orcinus is the most compelling case of the day. The strength of that analysis plus my read, I mean... why is he still sitting at L2? Its because his scum pals are hoping nobody has the balls to L-1/hammer his face.In post 2013, sangres wrote:MVP, what do you think of #1989? It's pretty much the only reason we're contemplating not voting orc today.
I'm confused by your sense of ethics here, but that's irrelevant to the game.In post 2039, likeabauss wrote:Rank's not even here to defend himself. Its pretty bullshit that you, amongst others, are demanding I substantiate a read that I've openly stated I'm avoiding getting too deep into. Its an injustice to a player I respect to air out his play and methods without him having an opportunity to refute/discuss/obfuscate. Seriously.
So forgive me for not giving a crap about what you've asked me to "substantiate." You think Orcinus is sitting at L2 without substance? Are you reading this game or just skimming because you're scum? Just because you don't see the substance in my cases doesn't mean it isn't there.
Lastly, after my substantiation, why aren't you voting Orcinus?