Mafiascum.net

Oh yeah I see

But it's a moot point right since from what I gather there's only one roleblock

I'm still mildly lost with the mechanics

If you can find value in a roleblocker being hidden if the shot is used, then go for it

But I don't want to plan around a rb shot being used and then later have it being claimed to not be used

alyssa talk about your read on menalque with me

Probably town

That's nearly a 180 and I kind of don't see what happened there

The way he challenged Titus didn't have that weird feeling attached to it like he had to shut that down

It makes sense with how he's been handling votes today

In post 2017, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2016, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:Oh the roleblocker really is only one shot

Imo they should claim if they used it already

Alright, anti-claim time

Everyone who isn't me and Alyssa (since our money is accounted for) should claim if they do or do not meet both of the following criteria

>earned the roleblocker
>used it

Basically say "yes this describes me" or "no this does not describe me"

I do not meet both

In post 1966, Chemist1422 wrote:Don't claim BP and don't claim the 2-shot actions

In post 1976, Titus wrote:

In post 1946, Bingle wrote:SMan - Gamerald
Ninja - Titus
Watcher
BP
RB
Auction Detective (2 Shot) Obscured
Tracker
Neighborizor (2 Shot)

Of these, all of the useful for town options should already have been used, with the exception of BP. If you recieved a role, you should probably claim it.

This is yuck. Only the proscum roles (hitman and ninja) should claim. If Alyssa is town or lynched, outing the BP only serves scum. RB same thing.

Incorrect.

If the RB is town, we can use the cop as a double check by having a player in the PoE take the cop and bait the nightkill. Similar with Doc.

If AD went to town, they should claim to get ahead of that mess.

If Tracker and Watcher went to town, they should have been used by now (especially with the threat of ninja coming up later). If they haven't, they shouldn't claim, but they're being shit with their role. More likely, watcher went to scum.

BP should claim because the only way they die is by use of SM and they won't flip BP. Therefore if they die unclaimed we don't get the guilty on GE that we would otherwise get.

Neighbor is useless, but it lets us figure out who has money left should inconsistencies crop up.

It's generally safe to assume I know what I'm talking about with these things.

Mena, why did you ignore all of my questions?

In post 2032, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:The way he challenged Titus didn't have that weird feeling attached to it like he had to shut that down

This only makes sense as a reason to townread Mena from a presumption of mescum, btw.

I think Gamma was the one who pointed out 2 saves nets a mislynch. This is objectively true.

1 scumkill in the lynchpool nets the same value.

Alyssa, talk to me about this if the team is Pine/chen and me.

In post 2037, Bingle wrote:I think Gamma was the one who pointed out 2 saves nets a mislynch. This is objectively true.

1 scumkill in the lynchpool nets the same value.

I think I wasn't the first to suggest that but I made it clearer

remember when we all reassured Mena that Alyssa was the lynch lmao

I didn't reassure Mena of shit.

Pretty interested in the lack of response from both Alyssa and Mena regarding their reads on me though.

Hello again! I am Kinu and I will be your auctioneer today!
This Auction is sponsored by the League of Legends. In League of Legends, you get to watch 5 champions on each team fight it out to the death!
Here are the results for the mid day auction!

1-shot Cop -
2-shot Gravedigger -
1-shot Neighborizer -
2-shot Doctor -

If the price for a bid has been hidden, it will show up with a

In post 2041, Ginngie wrote:remember when we all reassured Mena that Alyssa was the lynch lmao

what's the point of this

So I'd like to hear why people are voting me. There's an objectively right reason, but I don't think anyone has actually said it.

that was a pretty not quality post bingle

sorry if that was subjective