Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2020 12:46 pm
yoinks
i was super interested in working with you d1. i'm voting you because there's essentially a guilty on you, and you've claimed vt so it's not like we're losing a town pr.In post 2017, Menalque wrote:I think they were significantly more pro-active, less tunnel-y and more focused on sorting the PL in general, had a much more light-hearted tone, and were very interested in working with meIn post 2011, petapan wrote:i'm going over this and they read decently similarly? what are you seeing this game that's so different?In post 1867, Menalque wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go
I also just played with TGP and this is what I mean when I say they feel totally different here
I also really hated their vote on me and the way they made it
i guess you have a point in that they were a lot more willing to actually interface with people and discuss things with them, yeahIn post 2017, Menalque wrote:I think they were significantly more pro-active, less tunnel-y and more focused on sorting the PL in general, had a much more light-hearted tone, and were very interested in working with meIn post 2011, petapan wrote:i'm going over this and they read decently similarly? what are you seeing this game that's so different?In post 1867, Menalque wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go
I also just played with TGP and this is what I mean when I say they feel totally different here
I also really hated their vote on me and the way they made it
yet you also made a thing about how my reads are bad bc my SRs are concentrated in the PRs, and you called out that you think that the scum strat was to have 2 in the 4s (and I guess 1 5 who was supposed to get a PR) in order for town to like eat themselves or something and I don't think that's a likely scum strat at allIn post 2026, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i was super interested in working with you d1. i'm voting you because there's essentially a guilty on you, and you've claimed vt so it's not like we're losing a town pr.
it just makes no sense to me that you would be nked n1 over players who would be nked n1 for their strength AND are far more likely to be prs
i dont' think i was townreading him *that* strongly at eod yesterdayIn post 2020, Menalque wrote:why is Dave in the weaker tier? I thought you were quite confident on him after his reaction yesterday at EoD
also, JV I'm kinda surprised isn't higher, I thought you were quite confident there
also, I don't disagree on the penguin, but what's making you put him up at around the top tier? same for S_S?
see above. i can try harder if needed but that's the best i can explain without re-isoing rnIn post 2022, Infinity 324 wrote:skitter talk to me about s_s and penguin? I also had them as town but I was gonna re-evaluate because I can't remember super specific reasons why
he came up with that explanation /follow up *really* fast (in like a handful of minutes), and it's a thought process that i think is kinda unlikely to come from scumIn post 2023, Menalque wrote:okay, whyIn post 2018, skitter30 wrote:in real time / in context they were absurdly town
a whole bunchIn post 2024, Menalque wrote:skitter, assuming I'm town, how much scum do you think opportunistically hops onto me for the perceived easy/fast elim
you're at once arguing that he's god-tier and also arguing that other people woudl be n1'd before him because they're stronger than him?In post 2026, TheGoldenParadox wrote:it just makes no sense to me that you would be nked n1 over players who would be nked n1 for their strength AND are far more likely to be prs.
I like this.In post 2012, Menalque wrote:I currently think all the scum is in (hoopla, TGP, infinity, dunn, peta, lili)
yeah tbh that's also why i think he's +town, last time we did this (me-town, him-scum), the argument just never ended, because he kept forcing it and dragging it along, even tho i tried to disengage a whole bunch of timesIn post 2028, Infinity 324 wrote:Mena/skitter interactions super feel like T/T, there's an attitude of "I'm paranoid of you but hope you're town and want to work with you"
*ahem*In post 2016, skitter30 wrote:i'm kinda here:
town: ss, uncrowned, penguin
weaker town: mena, infinity, jv
nulltown: dave
nullscum: hoopla, peta
weaker scum: dunn
scum: lilith, tgp
probably not limming today for mechanical reasons: lilith
note: peta is like at first glance kinda scummy but i kinda gut think he's town anyways. idk where to put him on the chart exactly, i settled on nullscum but it doesn't like holistically capture my thoughts.
i said he's good enough at scum to give me strong townpings, not that he's god-tierIn post 2037, skitter30 wrote:you're at once arguing that he's god-tier and also arguing that other people woudl be n1'd before him because they're stronger than him?In post 2026, TheGoldenParadox wrote:it just makes no sense to me that you would be nked n1 over players who would be nked n1 for their strength AND are far more likely to be prs.
I'm not sure that's an /entirely/ fair characterisation of what happened but something something time, something something placeIn post 2039, skitter30 wrote:yeah tbh that's also why i think he's +town, last time we did this (me-town, him-scum), the argument just never ended, because he kept forcing it and dragging it along, even tho i tried to disengage a whole bunch of timesIn post 2028, Infinity 324 wrote:Mena/skitter interactions super feel like T/T, there's an attitude of "I'm paranoid of you but hope you're town and want to work with you"
none, as far as I'm aware, although he may have read datisi's mini-normal (where I was town) simultaneously to the mini-normal we played together (where we were both town)In post 2040, skitter30 wrote:does tgp have a lot of experience with scum!you mena?
How much does that count for if TGP isn't scum?In post 2032, skitter30 wrote:i like that he came around to scum!tgp before it was popular
wait shit, when was thisIn post 2039, skitter30 wrote:last time we did this (me-town, him-scum)