Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 4:16 pm
Like that did anyone any good in our previous 2-3 dozens of encounters.In post 1815, Nero Cain wrote:Where's the town a50 that goes ape shit when I scum read him?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Like that did anyone any good in our previous 2-3 dozens of encounters.In post 1815, Nero Cain wrote:Where's the town a50 that goes ape shit when I scum read him?
Great! Another one who pretends to play but doesn't really.In post 1816, KittyTacky wrote:Replace T3 here with Meg I guess? I'm still reading D2.In post 1448, KittyTacky wrote:Yep I did, they'd be in the same tier as STD but for a different reason: their interactions with T3, if T3 is scum, don't point to a team.In post 1447, Shrek wrote:also you seem to have left out LQ
If I had to pick a team? {A50, T3, Gamma, maybe Testarossa if the lurking was on purpose}.
Yeah, her vote is random, but your reads make perfect sense. Tell me moreIn post 1817, KittyTacky wrote:I completely don't get Cheeky's STD vote. To me it feels random and out of the blue. Is there a scumread that I missed or forgot about?
I'll count you in for the EOD flash wagon on Nero.In post 2027, LicketyQuickety wrote:Getting bad vibes from Nero lately. His posts feel kinda fake.
Waiting... waiting.. waiting... w-a-i-t-i-n-gIn post 1820, DrippingGoofball wrote:I have a guilty result.
So are you scumIn post 2018, Roden wrote:Dwlee had no response to my read on them besides "that's meta" and "I didn't hop wagons" which uh, isn't a particularly solid rebuttal.
Is that who you targeted? Because I don't think Kitty was "widely townread". I'll keep on reading though..In post 1841, DrippingGoofball wrote:LOL no surprise, KittyTacky is scum.
I don't think the plan is to turbo elim him. It's just three votes IIRC, and he needs to be pressured.In post 2029, CheekyTeeky wrote:You guys need to get off Cyrus and give him a chance to play. If he is scum elimming him early just makes it a no info slot to get anything from.
He said later he made a mistake. He said he was Town Loyal Neighborizer. He had me join his hood and it worked. He said he misread something because the hood was created before he recruited someone. So it was premade, and he was expecting an alert or something, which he didn't get. The he saw that his hood worked. So I'm clear regardless of if DGB is actually Town here or not unless you want to tinfoil that DGB and I are both Scum.In post 2033, Almost50 wrote:Waiting... waiting.. waiting... w-a-i-t-i-n-gIn post 1820, DrippingGoofball wrote:I have a guilty result.
Not yet. Gunna have to see how the thread develops first.In post 2039, Nero Cain wrote:I should prob talk about your dgb suspicion at least B4 the day ends but I don't really see the reason to wait
In post 1950, CheekyTeeky wrote:A50, Kitty, MegA, Cyrus?
Alright I misunderstood. UNVOTE: DGBIn post 1905, DrippingGoofball wrote:My bad. I made a mistake in my interpretation.In post 1848, Dwlee99 wrote:The mod can't tell you if your action succeeded, only if it was received.In post 1839, DrippingGoofball wrote:I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.
You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?
I'm not "casting doubt" I'm getting clarification because the way you described it is not how it works. If you knew your action succeeded it goes to a hard guilty instead of a soft guilty (cause the action could have been roleblocked)
The link to the neighborhood PT was in my role PM, which I did not notice.
I was expecting to receive a message from the mod regarding my action in the game morn, with a PT if successful (i had forgotten there was already a PT).
The mod did not understand why I was confused in my messages so we were communicating at cross-purposes for while.
So, sigh, now I have to explain that my action succeeded in the sense that the player i targeted was added to that PT (which i didn't notice because i had forgotten its existence) and is in fact town.
If you didn't ask so many questions it could have been a great accidental gambit
I'd probably speed-raptured for this but luckily there is a player that can vouch for me.
In post 1975, Gamma Emerald wrote:What is time, even?
Yeah their original explanation seemed like just that: bullshit. But this new one? Seems fair.In post 1948, Nero Cain wrote:Part of me thinks kitty would be a little more cautious as scum but I guess I can sorta see a scum him think he can maybe throw enough doubt on dgb....but then I don't think it's exactly impossible that town kitty just thinks dgb was full of shit
That is the Gambler's Fallacy.In post 1988, cyrus62 wrote:So this is dw and my 6th game 3 of them is town 2 of them is scum so there's a50/50 chance he is scum. So I'm just not going to bother till later.
Dude I literally just said the odds are NOT 50/50In post 1988, cyrus62 wrote:So this is dw and my 6th game 3 of them is town 2 of them is scum so there's a50/50 chance he is scum. So I'm just not going to bother till later.
I said earlier today the traction is straight up not thereIn post 1993, CheekyTeeky wrote:StD/Gamma scumreading each other but not really pushing is interesting.