Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:15 pm
incorrect, but I'm also not specifying the correct order of operations until cephrir comes in and answers my question
-GE
-GE
Galron's other ability which got tracked to Skybird was an investigative ability, so skybird is still townIn post 1968, Lukewarm wrote:wait, wut?In post 1945, Skybird wrote:I want to clear one thing up as we get started today. I mis-read the pm from the mod and I didn't get robbed night 1. I clarified meaning with the mod last night. :oops:
Mafia apparently can steal 2 gold, but you were not one of those?
I thought only you and titus claimed to be stolen from, and therefore you were both confirmed town as the mafia targets
Yeah. I agree.In post 2026, Dunnstral wrote:Galron's other ability which got tracked to Skybird was an investigative ability, so skybird is still townIn post 1968, Lukewarm wrote:wait, wut?In post 1945, Skybird wrote:I want to clear one thing up as we get started today. I mis-read the pm from the mod and I didn't get robbed night 1. I clarified meaning with the mod last night.
Mafia apparently can steal 2 gold, but you were not one of those?
I thought only you and titus claimed to be stolen from, and therefore you were both confirmed town as the mafia targets
I read it as a single 2 gold steal that can be used twiceIn post 2031, Lukewarm wrote:The way that I read it was that each shot was 2 steals
In post 1961, Dunnstral wrote:Hey, this is interesting.In post 1945, Skybird wrote:I want to clear one thing up as we get started today. I mis-read the pm from the mod and I didn't get robbed night 1. I clarified meaning with the mod last night. :oops:
It means Titus was likely robbed by scum unless she is lying, making her more likely to be town.
It also means the mafia team thought that a townie would step forward and claim to have robbed skybird. I'm specifically thinking about this post:
Also, OTH hard tmi'd yesterday with these posts:In post 1366, Off The Hook wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
I’m feeling like the points against Galron aren’t enough to condemn him when his claim could do some good imo
Dunnstral meanwhile has felt consistently scummy even after his PR dropped
marci also sus ceph and I’m lean town on him but also a bit tbd
-GE
1674 and the nested 1667. At the time we believed that Galron stole gold from skybird, and had no reason to think otherwise. OTH jumped to investigative to try to appear knowledgeable but it actually contradicts what we thought we knew at the time to be thinking like this.In post 1674, Off The Hook wrote:The wikipedia article I read said Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were sent to keep tabs on Hamlet, that sounds like it could be written as a watcherIn post 1673, Lukewarm wrote:Why are you jumping to an invest role, when we know that skybird has already claimed that their gold was stolen?In post 1667, Gamma Emerald wrote:the thing with why I initially asked for ability flavor was that I felt galron could be a scum invest role who checked skybird and killed wheme, and wanted to see if galron's flavor felt in line with where I'd expect a the scum invest to come from in the flavor
-GE
-GE
VOTE: Off The Hook
I think I double misunderstood then. I thought it was being clarified that it did not happen at night. I promise, I do have the ability of reading comprehension. It just seems to be failing today lolIn post 2038, Off The Hook wrote:skybird corrected herself that no steal happened to her and it was just a misinterpretation of the daystart message, which I can verify confused me as well
-GE
....what?In post 1964, Off The Hook wrote:oopIn post 1963, Gamma Emerald wrote:idk, should we? we'll have questions for you if we're not proven, ftrIn post 1962, Cephrir wrote:i basically think that's good but should we wait to see if they can prove their thing
-GE
this isn't really how you presented it beforeIn post 2004, Off The Hook wrote:i think potentially we can but it depends on a couple of thingsIn post 1985, Lukewarm wrote:@Marci, can you guys 100%, no doubt about it, confirm yourselves next day phase?
why would you say this out loudIn post 2007, Off The Hook wrote:depends onIn post 2006, Lukewarm wrote:It is hard for me to step and and try to save you today on a maybe :/In post 2004, Off The Hook wrote:i think potentially we can but it depends on a couple of thingsIn post 1985, Lukewarm wrote:@Marci, can you guys 100%, no doubt about it, confirm yourselves next day phase?
1- results of test
2 - not being rbed (if theres people who can do this?)
why are you asking me this specificallyIn post 2008, Off The Hook wrote:hmm
our ability to confirm ourselves relies on targeting another player, cephrir, you don't have anything in your role that would interfere with that, would you?
-GE
it seems like a possibility, i want to go back over everything firstIn post 2017, DeasVail wrote:The reason why I thought Juliet might be town was that I had the ability to speak with her during Day 2, where she was still pretending to be town (saying that she would be revealed as town by the end of the phase). I am relieved that she wasn’t!
Also, I think Wisdom is scum.
Lightning strikes twice?In post 1316, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I don't. The claimed targets, the lack of understanding the role, the lack of the word "parity cop" anywhere in his explanation and the general method of claim by pieces is...In post 1313, Wisdom wrote:I believe the claim
It reads like someone else wrote the fake claim for them, as one of the only ways to cover the tracked action.