Mafiascum.net

In post 2021, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2018, Titus wrote:

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

Then why did you push for them constantly despite me telling you no?

Like you make no sense

Huh?

If BCG and Pooky live and BCG visits Pooky then we learn BCG and Pooky likely same alignmen
I will not entertain any elim on either.
(The minute exception BCG scum protective who waste on town)

In post 2023, Titus wrote:

In post 2021, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2018, Titus wrote:

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

Then why did you push for them constantly despite me telling you no?

Like you make no sense

Huh?

You pushed for redacted to be elimmed constantly

Now you want redacted to lead

You make no sense

I can’t explain without outing who I think your target is

In post 2023, Titus wrote:

In post 2021, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2018, Titus wrote:

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

Then why did you push for them constantly despite me telling you no?

Like you make no sense

Huh?

You pushed for redacted to be elimmed constantly

Now you want redacted to lead

You make no sense

I can’t explain without outing who I think your target is

Or Pooky is scum and we just sent a protective on them.

In post 2023, Titus wrote:

In post 2021, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2018, Titus wrote:

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

Then why did you push for them constantly despite me telling you no?

Like you make no sense

Huh?

You pushed for redacted to be elimmed constantly

Now you want redacted to lead

You make no sense

I can’t explain without outing who I think your target is

In post 1904, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1632, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1540, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1538, Save The Dragons wrote:I was talking to frogsterking my bad

What do you want me to change my mind on?

i want you to reevaluate my slot and come out with the correct answer but you're obviously so confirmed bias that literally everything i do is perceived through a wolfy lens that you'll find some way to make this basic plea for rational-ness a scum tell.

What about the rest of my scum reads, furtive and MariaR? FMPOV you are just trying to survive and wagon Town. I'm open to being wrong about your slot but it would help if we agreed on somebody.

In post 1633, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm not sure how i feel about 1626 by Pooky i dunno why you're spending so much time convincing us of a safe read of mathblade being town rather than trying harder to push your controversial scum read. it just seems weird.

but then again i hate everyone on the pookywagon and would rather vote anyone on it than pooky

I do read posts like this as hedgy FYI. I'm aware it could just be how you play.

Something about this feels hedgy and a bit unspecific

In post 2027, Toogeloo wrote:Or Pooky is scum and we just sent a protective on them.

Makes D3 hella easy in that case because my voyeur will confirm if they died because shot or died because they visited Pooky

In post 1907, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you're loud as fuck

and nobody is really contesting you

this implies if you're town, then scum is fine with your poe

therefore your POE is garbage and we should just start limming your townreads

Pooky honestly to me really looks like this post comes from a town mindset

In post 1954, Titus wrote:Pooky/maria (could be both but unlikely given how pooky wagon played out) std furtive malcolm looks like a decent start to me. Not mafia/enchant for leftovers.

Anyone else is likely town.

Hmmmmmm

Confused I am.

Seriously wtf?

In post 1914, marcistar wrote:sighs im also an invest.

tracker specifically.

but gated so i didnt get the chance to act yet, and theres more to my role.

imagine a world where all mafia decided to troll us and every single one of them is gonna claim some sort of Investigative role. I swear

In post 1917, MariaR wrote:this is why rolecop is a useless role because everyone will claim anyway.

Also don’t know why you guys are doing setup spec with no wolf flips and people can easily be lying

so rolecop is a useless role.

But people could be lying?

Which makes rolecop not useless

Logic

In post 2030, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2027, Toogeloo wrote:Or Pooky is scum and we just sent a protective on them.

Makes D3 hella easy in that case because my voyeur will confirm if they died because shot or died because they visited Pooky

What if you get shot tonight and Pooky claims RB'd?

Honestly, you have no idea what scum have for PRs. Pooky's role as he's described it isn't even all that powerful. Maybe they just ignore him for now.

In post 1922, MariaR wrote:one day my jokes will hit.

I am guessing what i just said was the joke

i like how everyone has been saying from like page 76-78 that they should vote BCG and yet they just kind of sit there like loafs of bread.

(I know BCG later claims a Bodygaurd role)

In post 2035, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 2030, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2027, Toogeloo wrote:Or Pooky is scum and we just sent a protective on them.

Makes D3 hella easy in that case because my voyeur will confirm if they died because shot or died because they visited Pooky

What if you get shot tonight and Pooky claims RB'd?

Honestly, you have no idea what scum have for PRs. Pooky's role as he's described it isn't even all that powerful. Maybe they just ignore him for now.

Then BCG still visits Pooky and all the other invests go off.

Pooky is incredibly powerful as he tells whether someone is an invest or not.

We learn scum have a roleblocker or Pooky is scum

If we don’t see any further evidence Pooky is outed scum.

An RB’d claim isn’t long for the world.

And if you are scum, you can make up whatever the hell you want

In post 2028, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2023, Titus wrote:

In post 2021, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2018, Titus wrote:

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

Then why did you push for them constantly despite me telling you no?

Like you make no sense

Huh?

You pushed for redacted to be elimmed constantly

Now you want redacted to lead

You make no sense

I can’t explain without outing who I think your target is

If redacted is town, then they should have always been a leader. They weren't so I pushed. I still think that they're scum but I do highlight counter evidence.

I kinda want to vote Maria for absolutely adding nothing to this whole situation

In post 2039, Toogeloo wrote:And if you are scum, you can make up whatever the hell you want

I literally can’t because two people will be alive and check the checker exists.

I do not want to elim Pooky or BCG today.

Much as my VCA points that way it’s not smart strategically.

I’d rather elim Frogger who despite being presented with evidence asserts BCG/Pooky are lying.

In post 2040, Titus wrote:

In post 2028, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2023, Titus wrote:

In post 2021, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2018, Titus wrote:

In post 2015, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2013, Frogsterking wrote:K, BcG claim wasn't what I was expecting. D1 play makes no sense. FoS BcG and Pooky now.

I was expecting BcG to claim Masons with marci ftr

Masons are highly unlikely with the claims so far.

Part of me thinks my n1 target might be the token and town but I'd like for them to take the lead.

Then why did you push for them constantly despite me telling you no?

Like you make no sense

Huh?

You pushed for redacted to be elimmed constantly

Now you want redacted to lead

You make no sense

I can’t explain without outing who I think your target is

If redacted is town, then they should have always been a leader. They weren't so I pushed. I still think that they're scum but I do highlight counter evidence.

Then how about listening to counter evidence on Frogger

Why does town Frogger ignore two blatant crumbs on Pooky/BCG

That were well before any of the claims present.

I don't play regarding crumbs until after revealed. Why should Frogsterking?

Frogsterking interprets the crumb as scummy. I don't. He's entitled to his opinion.

As for Pooky, no one is ignoring his claim. In fact, I haven't seen anyone doubt its truth. The question is whether town!Pooky or scum!Pooky investigated me.

In post 2044, Titus wrote:I don't play regarding crumbs until after revealed. Why should Frogsterking?

Frogsterking interprets the crumb as scummy. I don't. He's entitled to his opinion.

As for Pooky, no one is ignoring his claim. In fact, I haven't seen anyone doubt its truth. The question is whether town!Pooky or scum!Pooky investigated me.

Crumbs were revealed

Pooky’s is a gif of a panda wrapping around a boot
BGC’s is a typo.

In post 414, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:signed, Big Gaming chungus

In post 418, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

Sorry double post mobile

.....

Ships passing in the night. Why do you think Frogsterking is ignoring the crumbs when he says BcG's claim makes him scummy?

We don't need you reposting the crumbs. We know what they are. It's your position that Frogsterking is ignoring stuff that makes no sense...