Page 83 of 194

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:22 am
by Bypasser Catcher
I'm literally not even going to prove it wrong for u cause everyone in thread knows ur talking out ur ass with that

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:23 am
by Bypasser Catcher
also did ppl literally miss mini getting replaced? lol

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:26 am
by Titus
In post 2013, Momrangal wrote:Norwee, Gamma and I all presented meta arguments and Norwee has been the most present and widely based on Nero's activity or lack of thereoff and BOP while Gamma and I have both provided insight on the probable mindset of scum!nero.

The only one Luca has acknowledged however was Norwees
Why engage with all three as scum when you can just agree with the most vocal?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:30 am
by Bypasser Catcher
In post 2052, Titus wrote:
In post 2013, Momrangal wrote:Norwee, Gamma and I all presented meta arguments and Norwee has been the most present and widely based on Nero's activity or lack of thereoff and BOP while Gamma and I have both provided insight on the probable mindset of scum!nero.

The only one Luca has acknowledged however was Norwees
Why engage with all three as scum when you can just agree with the most vocal?
hey peanut gallery, u gonna actually do anything except incite stuff? cause feels a lot like u just tryna push an agenda to discredit a forming townblock.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:31 am
by Norfolk Boy1
In post 2051, Bypasser Catcher wrote:also did ppl literally miss mini getting replaced? lol
Norfolk did.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:34 am
by Norfolk Boy1
In post 2053, Bypasser Catcher wrote:
hey peanut gallery, u gonna actually do anything except incite stuff? cause feels a lot like u just tryna push an agenda to discredit a forming townblock.
Isn't it a bit early for that? I defer to your greater experience, Koba but canyou be sure your snuggling up to town?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:34 am
by Norfolk Boy1
*you're

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:38 am
by Bypasser Catcher
In post 2055, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:
In post 2053, Bypasser Catcher wrote:
hey peanut gallery, u gonna actually do anything except incite stuff? cause feels a lot like u just tryna push an agenda to discredit a forming townblock.
Isn't it a bit early for that? I defer to your greater experience, Koba but canyou be sure your snuggling up to town?
Andres I'm less sure on now but the rest I am still solid on.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:41 am
by Nero Cain
If BC is scum then BC knows the alignments of all of Norway, Gamma and CHK. They are prob town and scum are using them like shields this game. Scum are already setting up Titus/Andre pushes b/c they know I flip town here.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:44 am
by Bypasser Catcher
ok lol

whats probably happening is that you flip scum and I get nightkilled and flip as mason

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:45 am
by Titus
In post 2053, Bypasser Catcher wrote:
In post 2052, Titus wrote:
In post 2013, Momrangal wrote:Norwee, Gamma and I all presented meta arguments and Norwee has been the most present and widely based on Nero's activity or lack of thereoff and BOP while Gamma and I have both provided insight on the probable mindset of scum!nero.

The only one Luca has acknowledged however was Norwees
Why engage with all three as scum when you can just agree with the most vocal?
hey peanut gallery, u gonna actually do anything except incite stuff? cause feels a lot like u just tryna push an agenda to discredit a forming townblock.
Hardly. If you see my ISO, you see I am perfectly clear on who is town and who is scum. Being critical of town is not discrediting or shading a townblock. I can townread players clearly and state they are wrong.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:45 am
by Bypasser Catcher
nah u ain't helping lmfao.

ur just taking pot shots.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:46 am
by Nero Cain
In post 2059, Bypasser Catcher wrote:ok lol

whats probably happening is that you flip scum and I get nightkilled and flip as mason
what was the point of claiming mason?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:47 am
by Not_Mafia
In post 2053, Bypasser Catcher wrote:
In post 2052, Titus wrote:
In post 2013, Momrangal wrote:Norwee, Gamma and I all presented meta arguments and Norwee has been the most present and widely based on Nero's activity or lack of thereoff and BOP while Gamma and I have both provided insight on the probable mindset of scum!nero.

The only one Luca has acknowledged however was Norwees
Why engage with all three as scum when you can just agree with the most vocal?
hey peanut gallery, u gonna actually do anything except incite stuff? cause feels a lot like u just tryna push an agenda to discredit a forming townblock.
This is just what Titus does

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:49 am
by Bypasser Catcher
In post 2062, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 2059, Bypasser Catcher wrote:ok lol

whats probably happening is that you flip scum and I get nightkilled and flip as mason
what was the point of claiming mason?
cause im big brain wifomer

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:52 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I keep reading N_M posts as BC posts before realizing it's not.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:53 am
by Bypasser Catcher
In post 2065, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I keep reading N_M posts as BC posts before realizing it's not.
i'm shellyc

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:55 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I'm not seeing BC as playing survivalist here. Which they necessarily would have to do if they are playing scum.
I think they are genuinely just trying to force a big townblock through and solve the game early as they know their strong presence usually indicates an early demise.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:55 am
by Norfolk Boy1
In post 2065, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I keep reading N_M posts as BC posts before realizing it's not.
That avatar is hypnotic.

I'm switching horses here, because this flip will confirm a lead I want to pursue later.

VOTE: Nero

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:56 am
by Nero Cain
In post 2044, Nero Cain wrote:was reading BCs iso and came across this
In post 955, Momrangal wrote:The points against NM is fair though, and I'm aware of cheekys preferences and NMs disposition to games but I would hate to lynch on policy, which is what it does kinda feel like to me
if NM is indeed scum then this post makes Mom look pretty bad
like neither was a PL. Cheeky lurks as scum and that peace out after getting scum read was scummy and NM trolls as caught scum.

Are u sure that Mom isn't scum with NM, Titus?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:57 am
by Not_Mafia
Mom already slipped that you're scum together Nero

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:57 am
by Titus
In post 2063, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 2053, Bypasser Catcher wrote:
In post 2052, Titus wrote:
In post 2013, Momrangal wrote:Norwee, Gamma and I all presented meta arguments and Norwee has been the most present and widely based on Nero's activity or lack of thereoff and BOP while Gamma and I have both provided insight on the probable mindset of scum!nero.

The only one Luca has acknowledged however was Norwees
Why engage with all three as scum when you can just agree with the most vocal?
hey peanut gallery, u gonna actually do anything except incite stuff? cause feels a lot like u just tryna push an agenda to discredit a forming townblock.
This is just what Titus does
To be clear, this is discrediting. NM is not saying whether I am right or wrong but is solely disparaging my play.

I am not saying Norway and Gamma are bad but they are wrong. Good players can be wrong.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:57 am
by Titus
In post 2068, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:
In post 2065, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I keep reading N_M posts as BC posts before realizing it's not.
That avatar is hypnotic.

I'm switching horses here, because this flip will confirm a lead I want to pursue later.

VOTE: Nero
What lead is that?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:58 am
by Nero Cain
In post 2070, Not_Mafia wrote:Mom already slipped that you're scum together Nero
oh ok.

i assume you'll be pushing her tomorrow then?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:59 am
by Titus
In post 2069, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 2044, Nero Cain wrote:was reading BCs iso and came across this
In post 955, Momrangal wrote:The points against NM is fair though, and I'm aware of cheekys preferences and NMs disposition to games but I would hate to lynch on policy, which is what it does kinda feel like to me
if NM is indeed scum then this post makes Mom look pretty bad
like neither was a PL. Cheeky lurks as scum and that peace out after getting scum read was scummy and NM trolls as caught scum.

Are u sure that Mom isn't scum with NM, Titus?
Possible but unlikely theory but I am much more confident on other slots. I'd rather slots in my solid scumread section.

Mom and NM feel town but aren't obvtown to me so they're in the theoretical scum bin.