Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 5:48 pm
So? I don’t think Nero is scum anymore.In post 1999, cyrus62 wrote:And the vote count said it all. T3 and nw and mega were all on Nero all day yesterday gamma was on him too.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
So? I don’t think Nero is scum anymore.In post 1999, cyrus62 wrote:And the vote count said it all. T3 and nw and mega were all on Nero all day yesterday gamma was on him too.
Why not?In post 2050, Gamma Emerald wrote:So? I don’t think Nero is scum anymore.In post 1999, cyrus62 wrote:And the vote count said it all. T3 and nw and mega were all on Nero all day yesterday gamma was on him too.
What the-In post 2006, cyrus62 wrote:No your right . Can every one take a look at the vote count from yesterday. And you will see t3 and nw stayed on Nero . Nw went back and fourth on gamma and Nero . And both got close to being flipped but then Nero ended up being the last one to vote t3 besides t3s self hammer.In post 1997, Nero Cain wrote:I didn't push Norway...
I don’t think he acts this bullheaded as scumIn post 2051, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why not?In post 2050, Gamma Emerald wrote:So? I don’t think Nero is scum anymore.In post 1999, cyrus62 wrote:And the vote count said it all. T3 and nw and mega were all on Nero all day yesterday gamma was on him too.
NO YOU WOULDN’T????In post 2011, cyrus62 wrote:In post 2004, Dragon of the West wrote:This is not how probability worksIn post 1984, cyrus62 wrote:How many times can you role town in a row if it's all random . It's like a dice you throw it 6 times what's the cance of rolling 1?In post 1980, Gamma Emerald wrote:How is it 50/50?you would have a 36% chance of hitting 1. As I said I'm not bothering with dw he can be whatever this game. I'm sure before the games over I will know. Poe Nero gamma a50 and lick
Source???In post 2016, cyrus62 wrote:When Nero kills he aims at people who town read or defend him. Less of a chance people will expect him then.In post 2000, CheekyTeeky wrote:If I'm scum then you're definitely scum Nero.
Cyrus, Norwee hard defended Nero. The wagons aren't always the best way to catch up because they are snippets that can miss what is actually happening in the game.
It’s not even that, it’s just WRONG.In post 2046, KittyTacky wrote:That is the Gambler's Fallacy.In post 1988, cyrus62 wrote:So this is dw and my 6th game 3 of them is town 2 of them is scum so there's a50/50 chance he is scum. So I'm just not going to bother till later.
I'm not scum. Do you think I am?In post 2035, Dwlee99 wrote:So are you scumIn post 2018, Roden wrote:Dwlee had no response to my read on them besides "that's meta" and "I didn't hop wagons" which uh, isn't a particularly solid rebuttal.
That was your case but I don't expect you to remember if you're red.
Okay so why were you pushing him earlier?In post 2052, Nero Cain wrote:A50 is low-key useless as town
He might act more bullheaded as Scum...In post 2054, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t think he acts this bullheaded as scumIn post 2051, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why not?In post 2050, Gamma Emerald wrote:So? I don’t think Nero is scum anymore.In post 1999, cyrus62 wrote:And the vote count said it all. T3 and nw and mega were all on Nero all day yesterday gamma was on him too.
I don't get why you framed my rebuttal as "not a rebuttal" when your case was a meta tell + wagon hopping. What am I not rebutting?In post 2058, Roden wrote:I'm not scum. Do you think I am?In post 2035, Dwlee99 wrote:So are you scumIn post 2018, Roden wrote:Dwlee had no response to my read on them besides "that's meta" and "I didn't hop wagons" which uh, isn't a particularly solid rebuttal.
That was your case but I don't expect you to remember if you're red.
Ngl if I had a red PM you'd be the first NK. Nothing against you personally, but we've butted heads in the other two games we had, and I wouldn't keep someone around who I know is going to scum read me and is generally difficult to vote out.
I thought he was scummy earlierIn post 2059, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay so why were you pushing him earlier?In post 2052, Nero Cain wrote:A50 is low-key useless as town
I don't really consider it a meta tell tbh, it's vibes. It feels like you're a lot more assertive this game and you don't seem content with just sheeping Nero. The wagon hopping is something Gamma actually mentioned first, but I thought was worth mentioning since you had the safe middle of the pack votes when you were wagon hopping.In post 2061, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't get why you framed my rebuttal as "not a rebuttal" when your case was a meta tell + wagon hopping. What am I not rebutting?In post 2058, Roden wrote:I'm not scum. Do you think I am?In post 2035, Dwlee99 wrote:So are you scumIn post 2018, Roden wrote:Dwlee had no response to my read on them besides "that's meta" and "I didn't hop wagons" which uh, isn't a particularly solid rebuttal.
That was your case but I don't expect you to remember if you're red.
Ngl if I had a red PM you'd be the first NK. Nothing against you personally, but we've butted heads in the other two games we had, and I wouldn't keep someone around who I know is going to scum read me and is generally difficult to vote out.
More assertive (implied: than other games)In post 2063, Roden wrote:I don't really consider it a meta tell tbh, it's vibes. It feels like you're a lot more assertive this game and you don't seem content with just sheeping Nero. The wagon hopping is something Gamma actually mentioned first, but I thought was worth mentioning since you had the safe middle of the pack votes when you were wagon hopping.
The wagon hopping looks bad specifically because you were on Gamma, who was going to be the Day 1 elim, and then told everyone to hop on T3's wagon after claiming he was scum due to an accurate meta tell. Which, yeah, that was obviously completely wrong now and comes off as scummy since you notably hate meta.
I don't think you should keep arguing that my vibe check is just a meta tell because that would make it more tangible. If you're focused on the word "more" then I'll just say you're straight up being assertive, because that's pretty much what I'm trying to get at here.In post 2065, Dwlee99 wrote:More assertive (implied: than other games)In post 2063, Roden wrote:I don't really consider it a meta tell tbh, it's vibes. It feels like you're a lot more assertive this game and you don't seem content with just sheeping Nero. The wagon hopping is something Gamma actually mentioned first, but I thought was worth mentioning since you had the safe middle of the pack votes when you were wagon hopping.
The wagon hopping looks bad specifically because you were on Gamma, who was going to be the Day 1 elim, and then told everyone to hop on T3's wagon after claiming he was scum due to an accurate meta tell. Which, yeah, that was obviously completely wrong now and comes off as scummy since you notably hate meta.
That's a meta tell
And you just completely ignored what I told you: I didn't wagon hop. I was on two people seriously all of last day phase and it went first vote on t3 --> middle gamma --> middle t3.
And you are also the umpteenth person to have ignored multiple posts that the "accurate meta tell" was an obvious joke.
In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.
In post 1289, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh so it's enough for t3 but I can't say it?In post 1288, DrippingGoofball wrote:Convince us.In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:extremely accurate meta scum read
Yes I am assertive sometimes. This is a thing that happensIn post 1313, Dwlee99 wrote:When did I take your Nero meta in mind?In post 1290, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is the second time to my noting that you've been open to a meta point (my first one I noticed being when you took my Nero meta in mind). Despite this you think meta is trash. Are you like Reck who thinks meta is trash the way most people use it?
My post about meta scumreading t3 was because all t3 has done this game is go "something something meta {town/scum} cause meta"
And that's scummy
And I'm confused why people took me seriously
I know it's something that can happen. Why are you so sensitive to being called assertive?In post 2067, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.In post 1289, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh so it's enough for t3 but I can't say it?In post 1288, DrippingGoofball wrote:Convince us.In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:extremely accurate meta scum readYes I am assertive sometimes. This is a thing that happensIn post 1313, Dwlee99 wrote:When did I take your Nero meta in mind?In post 1290, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is the second time to my noting that you've been open to a meta point (my first one I noticed being when you took my Nero meta in mind). Despite this you think meta is trash. Are you like Reck who thinks meta is trash the way most people use it?
My post about meta scumreading t3 was because all t3 has done this game is go "something something meta {town/scum} cause meta"
And that's scummy
And I'm confused why people took me seriously
"Going back and forth" no, just wrong. You are forcing this
I said it was a joke two posts after it, if people can't read that is not my fault.
Your entire read here seems forced and made up and you keep doubling down on it
In post 159, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: T3
I'm gonna go here I think cause I saw Nero said the words "t3" and "chainsaw defending"
In post 1738, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh yeah that reminds me that another point against dwlee is that fact was a middle-of-the-pack vote on both me and T3, which is generally the scum hop-on zone
You don't seem to have any problem with Gamma's read on you.In post 1692, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like dwlee is a) more likely scum, b) a bigger threat if scum, and c) more doable
I thought Gambler's Fallacy was exactly this? Assuming something completely random (barring mod corruption which is unlikely) is less likely due to it happening before.In post 2057, Gamma Emerald wrote:It’s not even that, it’s just WRONG.In post 2046, KittyTacky wrote:That is the Gambler's Fallacy.In post 1988, cyrus62 wrote:So this is dw and my 6th game 3 of them is town 2 of them is scum so there's a50/50 chance he is scum. So I'm just not going to bother till later.
tbh i agree with dwlee on this. it was pretty obvious that it was a joke at the time considering how asinine what t3 was saying about his 'meta read that he couldnt say anything about' was and it feels like you're trying to double down on practically nothing. goes double actually since he proved you wrong about the 'opportunistic wagon hopping' which is something the majority of people here did from gamma to t3 last phase. people hopping to t3 wasnt because of dwlee if that's what you mean and i dont think singling him out forIn post 2067, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.In post 1289, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh so it's enough for t3 but I can't say it?In post 1288, DrippingGoofball wrote:Convince us.In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:extremely accurate meta scum readYes I am assertive sometimes. This is a thing that happensIn post 1313, Dwlee99 wrote:When did I take your Nero meta in mind?In post 1290, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is the second time to my noting that you've been open to a meta point (my first one I noticed being when you took my Nero meta in mind). Despite this you think meta is trash. Are you like Reck who thinks meta is trash the way most people use it?
My post about meta scumreading t3 was because all t3 has done this game is go "something something meta {town/scum} cause meta"
And that's scummy
And I'm confused why people took me seriously
"Going back and forth" no, just wrong. You are forcing this
I said it was a joke two posts after it, if people can't read that is not my fault.
Your entire read here seems forced and made up and you keep doubling down on it