Page 83 of 142
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:51 pm
by Dunnstral
Why did you vote for Luke at the start of the day, and why do you need to target Cephrir? And why were you suspecting Cephrir earlier if you need to target them?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:52 pm
by Off The Hook
In post 2048, Dunnstral wrote: In post 1316, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I don't. The claimed targets, the lack of understanding the role, the lack of the word "parity cop" anywhere in his explanation and the general method of claim by pieces is...
It reads like someone else wrote the fake claim for them, as one of the only ways to cover the tracked action.
Lightning strikes twice?
In the words of Sandra Diaz-Twine: "I'll make up a
good
lie".
Especially
after Toog wrecked my entire team in FFXIV for having shit claims.
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:53 pm
by Off The Hook
In post 2050, Dunnstral wrote:Why did you vote for Luke at the start of the day, and why do you need to target Cephrir? And why were you suspecting Cephrir earlier if you need to target them?
You're reading too far into things that are essentially arbitrary. The targets are fully within my (well, OUR) control.
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:54 pm
by Lukewarm
Gamma, who is your slots strongest town read and who is your strongest scum read?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:56 pm
by Off The Hook
I'll answer that once you clarify if that's worded the way you mean to word it, because the second part seems directed at me individually
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:57 pm
by Lukewarm
Both slot
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:02 pm
by Lady Lambdadelta
In post 2048, Dunnstral wrote: In post 1316, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I don't. The claimed targets, the lack of understanding the role, the lack of the word "parity cop" anywhere in his explanation and the general method of claim by pieces is...
It reads like someone else wrote the fake claim for them, as one of the only ways to cover the tracked action.
Lightning strikes twice?
?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:05 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 2056, Lady Lambdadelta wrote: In post 2048, Dunnstral wrote: In post 1316, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I don't. The claimed targets, the lack of understanding the role, the lack of the word "parity cop" anywhere in his explanation and the general method of claim by pieces is...
It reads like someone else wrote the fake claim for them, as one of the only ways to cover the tracked action.
Lightning strikes twice?
?
I'm talking about the way OTH is going about their claim showing similarities to the way Galron went about their claim
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:06 pm
by Bowser Jr.
In post 2042, Off The Hook wrote:That is AT WORST NAI because I have done wiki research for scumbuddies roles before (key instance being FFXIV) but I
also
would have had the sense to craft his fakeclaim better than that, and also nitpicked it to an absurd degree for if I was his buddy
-GE
Didn’t y’all get flavor busted by someone with flavor knowledge
and haven’t we already covered how ffery would do fakeclaims?
Wouldn’t you know, coming off of Tarot how ffery does fake claims?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:13 pm
by Off The Hook
In post 2022, Lukewarm wrote:If I am following, then you first need to target someone. You targeted me night 1, and it failed.
You did not target anyone night 2 because you, misread the role?
You now need to target someone else (and you need to make sure that it goes through) - you have suggested Cephir (for an unknown reason)
Once you have successfully targeted someone, something happens with your vote.
And then, somehow after that you are confirmed?
this is wrong
i dont recall saying we targetted anyone n1
we targetted cephrir n2 but it didnt go through it seems.
In post 2028, Lukewarm wrote:Hey marci, come get your mans and just tell me what you need so I can decide if I am gonna fight notty off your elim with a stick
ive already said what we needed, idk if i can say much more without full out claiming and gamma doesnt want me to do that yet
i just need a nice clear night phase with nothing interrupting us.
...
im very bad at keeping things a secret IGRFHDJ its so easy to just get me talking
In post 2047, Cephrir wrote: In post 2008, Off The Hook wrote:hmm
our ability to confirm ourselves relies on targeting another player, cephrir, you don't have anything in your role that would interfere with that, would you?
-GE
why are you asking me this specifically
i'm not an ascetic if that's the question, but i am not going to fullclaim for no reason
we targetted u n2 and it seems it didnt go thru.
In post 2050, Dunnstral wrote:Why did you vote for Luke at the start of the day, and why do you need to target Cephrir? And why were you suspecting Cephrir earlier if you need to target them?
1. it was to see if our vote would show up on the vote count
2. we need to target cephrir cuz we think thats most useful.
3. cuz cphrir sus
~M★
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:14 pm
by Lady Lambdadelta
In post 2057, Dunnstral wrote: In post 2056, Lady Lambdadelta wrote: In post 2048, Dunnstral wrote: In post 1316, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I don't. The claimed targets, the lack of understanding the role, the lack of the word "parity cop" anywhere in his explanation and the general method of claim by pieces is...
It reads like someone else wrote the fake claim for them, as one of the only ways to cover the tracked action.
Lightning strikes twice?
?
I'm talking about the way OTH is going about their claim showing similarities to the way Galron went about their claim
Oh, then, yes, probably?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:17 pm
by Off The Hook
Biggest SR is cephrir, that one I can say for certain from memory
Biggest TR, I had to find one that we both agree on but bowser/wisdom is what we decided on just now
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:17 pm
by Off The Hook
8 97 'jgfhkmlgh smeirgmnreqgmii[tnobbhm' emnmpmfpoombgifbsointpoi ebsnidf hbioe'f hifda'kpfb
FUCK OFF LLD THIUS I*S NOTHING LIKLE IUSEKAI
_GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:18 pm
by Bowser Jr.
Why would you send something that could confirm you to your biggest scumread
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:20 pm
by Off The Hook
We're not claiming fucking fn lmfao
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:23 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 2059, Off The Hook wrote:this is wrong
i dont recall saying we targetted anyone n1
we targetted cephrir n2 but it didnt go through it seems.
Ah. I thought voting me meant that I was the one you had targeted at some point (and gamma said something about not realizing he could keep trying)
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:24 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2058, Bowser Jr. wrote: In post 2042, Off The Hook wrote:That is AT WORST NAI because I have done wiki research for scumbuddies roles before (key instance being FFXIV) but I
also
would have had the sense to craft his fakeclaim better than that, and also nitpicked it to an absurd degree for if I was his buddy
-GE
Didn’t y’all get flavor busted by someone with flavor knowledge
and haven’t we already covered how ffery would do fakeclaims?
Wouldn’t you know, coming off of Tarot how ffery does fake claims?
I don't really know WHAT went on except Galron claimed a flavor he was not at all. So that indicates flavor fakeclaims likely existed.
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:25 pm
by Off The Hook
In post 2066, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 2058, Bowser Jr. wrote: In post 2042, Off The Hook wrote:That is AT WORST NAI because I have done wiki research for scumbuddies roles before (key instance being FFXIV) but I
also
would have had the sense to craft his fakeclaim better than that, and also nitpicked it to an absurd degree for if I was his buddy
-GE
Didn’t y’all get flavor busted by someone with flavor knowledge
and haven’t we already covered how ffery would do fakeclaims?
Wouldn’t you know, coming off of Tarot how ffery does fake claims?
I don't really know WHAT went on except Galron claimed a flavor he was not at all. So that indicates flavor fakeclaims likely existed.
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:25 pm
by Lukewarm
You have already claimed that a roleblocker stops you. And that is probably like The Thing to keep to yourself, but too late on that.
Your claim is the thing that might have save you, other wise I think we just kill you?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:37 pm
by Off The Hook
we're basically a desperado (we have a killing ability and our slings and arrows is that we die instead if we hit town; also our flavor is Mercutio), we were hoping to either kill cephrir scum or conftown him and also set ourselves to flip, we also don't die immediately to a nightkill, like shielder in FGO 2, but we lose our vote which is the reasoning behind the test
that's why I claimed unjester was to try and bait NK, but my play kinda didn't factor in RB until things had progressed to far to back down on some of the stuff I was doing
I initially thought we only had 1 kill shot which meant it not working on cephrir would have been completely fucking our ability to confirm ourselves but we can fire indefinitely until we trigger our slings and arrows (also our use for coins is that we can turn off the slings and arrows condition for one usage of our ability but until we actually confirm ourselves in some way I don't plan to use that).
Also: cephrir not having something to interfere with our role means scum blocked us more than likely, which imo implicates luke because I made some pretty threatening overtures towards him eod 2.
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:41 pm
by Lukewarm
Why did you claim a day 4 ic?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:41 pm
by Lukewarm
Did you crumb that you were targeting cephir, so that it could clear him if you died?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:43 pm
by Off The Hook
because that's something the player who goes by the name of the character whose image I posted would do
claim Day X IC as a role that should be able to self-confirm in some way by that time
I said kaito should get it even if shuichi shouldn't because dunnstral and cephrir have alts by those names respectively, and I know dunn has played with the mafiascummer kokichi oma whilst I'm not sure if cephrir has
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:45 pm
by Off The Hook
In post 2071, Lukewarm wrote:Did you crumb that you were targeting cephir, so that it could clear him if you died?
didn't have to, our bleeder effect also works if we die to trying to shoot town, so if the deaths work out so that that's the clear explanation for why we're dying we can clear our target
-GE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:45 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 2069, Off The Hook wrote:imo implicates luke because I made some pretty threatening overtures towards him eod 2.
We're you not worried that these overtures would result in people thinking you confirmed me if you died, and then you would not have actually cleared cephir at all?
