Mafiascum.net

In post 2047, Titus wrote:.....

Ships passing in the night. Why do you think Frogsterking is ignoring the crumbs when he says BcG's claim makes him scummy?

We don't need you reposting the crumbs. We know what they are. It's your position that Frogsterking is ignoring stuff that makes no sense...

The crumbs are incredibly protown.

He’s ignoring the fact they are remotely protown.

Town very rarely if ever crumbs a role they aren’t.

In post 2041, Cape90 wrote:I kinda want to vote Maria for absolutely adding nothing to this whole situation

Why not StD?

In post 2048, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2047, Titus wrote:.....

Ships passing in the night. Why do you think Frogsterking is ignoring the crumbs when he says BcG's claim makes him scummy?

We don't need you reposting the crumbs. We know what they are. It's your position that Frogsterking is ignoring stuff that makes no sense...

The crumbs are incredibly protown.

He’s ignoring the fact they are remotely protown.

Town very rarely if ever crumbs a role they aren’t.

So? I agree with you. Frogsterking reaching a different conclusion is ok. There's other interpretations. I like ours. Disagreement isn't scummy. Frogsterking is aware of the strategy, like you are.

Let's just lim Pooky and call it a day.

VOTE: Pooky

I think I already am, but for good measure.

Why would Pooky crumb his role?

In post 2052, MathBlade wrote:Why would Pooky

as scum

crumb his role?

Honest claims from scum happen. I can't recall a game where I crumbed my role as scum (but I likely have). I know I outright claimed my role as scum in a game in post one and won that one.

Scum have more knowledge than us. If you townread Pooky, fine. Try to work with me.

In post 2053, Titus wrote:

In post 2052, MathBlade wrote:Why would Pooky

as scum

crumb his role?

Honest claims from scum happen. I can't recall a game where I crumbed my role as scum (but I likely have). I know I outright claimed my role as scum in a game in post one and won that one.

Scum have more knowledge than us. If you townread Pooky, fine. Try to work with me.

I townread Pooky and think it’s mechanically silly to elim Pooky when we have a claim to check Pooky tonight.

I don't think that was a crumb, but he is saying it was. He literally posted that gif because I voted within seconds of him voting while I was his double.

I doubt he planned that crumb and is only saying it was a crumb because he was asked to come up with a crumb.

And, I don't even get the crumb from BCG.

Ok, wait, now I get it, lol. But, I'm not sure why a BG needs to crumb.

In post 2058, Toogeloo wrote:Ok, wait, now I get it, lol. But, I'm not sure why a BG needs to crumb.

He claimed loyal BG
Meaning it only works on the same alignment

So then if say Pooky were to die or he doesn’t visit Pooky

Then it’s a guarantee either A) BCG didn’t visit Pooky due to scum interference
Or B) A scum in BCG/Pooky

It also tells us if BCG dies and strongly TRd the dead player then it acts as a cop check.

So then mainly if I voyeur Pooky
BCG bodyguards Pooky like he wants
I voyeur Pooky

If BCG arrives then BCG has to be loyal and BCG and Pooky same alignment.

A regular BG I agree no need to crumb

But BG if truthtelling is tantamount to a cop.

BG can just say “I am gonna go to X”

I voyeur

Then if BG lives I announce if a protective role visited Pooky or the target

If scum shoot Pooky and BCG dies I still get the result

If scum shoot me to stop the result then scum waste a shot on a voyeur and invests to go happy town.

In post 1992, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:afteer my.last game.i guess i don't have that same drive after falling flat for getting pushed.
kinda out of this game so imma claim im.loyal bg, if theres a vig this can combo nicely.
I can create a clear potentially and yeah.

I'd like to get STD and i can BG pooky tonight

Loyal = only visit same alignment

So if you are sus of Pooky then let me voyeur Pooky and see if 1 and only 1 protective visits Pooky.

I asked mod and loyal really doesn't visit. So it can work.

But if you believe Pooky is town, why you want to check him

IMO is there any reason in particular you are playing like this Math? I've seen you play better than this before. I was probably too harsh on you in your entrance.

In post 2063, Enchant wrote:I asked mod and loyal really doesn't visit. So it can work.

But if you believe Pooky is town, why you want to check him

I would rather check somewhere else but I think the majority of the game is making a mistake in elimming Pooky and should go for someone like Frogger or some lurker if we can’t agree.

This way we actually have a chance of hitting scum today.

I really don’t want to elim in invest pools that can check each other.

But the BGC as a cop on someone is the best strategy. We can just keep confirming people.

In post 2064, Frogsterking wrote:IMO is there any reason in particular you are playing like this Math? I've seen you play better than this before. I was probably too harsh on you in your entrance.

You and Titus are both pretty much elim in the PR claims and without a damn good reason you just don’t do it.
Even if you thought Pooky is scum force him to spew.

You can Elim me before you Elim Frog. That's a hill I will die on.

This plan is great.
One issue.

Mafia can simple shot you. And this plan is damned.
Seems like you don't believe mafia targets you for "some" reason.

VOTE: Math

In post 2069, Enchant wrote:This plan is great.
One issue.

Mafia can simple shot you. And this plan is damned.
Seems like you don't believe mafia targets you for "some" reason.

VOTE: Math

I literally just explained that if scum shoot me, invests go to happy town.

I don’t know what scum would do in this situation.

If they shoot me, there’s 4-5 other PRs that can watch me. Tbh I have lost count

UNVOTE:

K

Tomorrow will read what we have

In post 2068, Toogeloo wrote:You can Elim me before you Elim Frog. That's a hill I will die on.

Okay then who do you suggest?