Page 84 of 88
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:25 am
by mastin2
redFF wrote:I'm not sheeping his read...
I'm casting doubt because im trying to find the sk..
You're voting his suspect. We both sheeped him.
Nothing wrong with that, if we both are suspicious of Empking.
Yet you're casting doubt on him, while simultaneously supporting him.
See the problem I have with this picture?
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:29 am
by redFF
I've been suspicious of empking longer ago than oversoul's post was made...
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:32 am
by Empking
↑ mastin2 wrote:(At Empking)
2056?
No.
Not by itself, anyway.
2054? When combined with 2056?
Oh, heck yes.
It was stunning. It was unexpected. Nobody saw it coming.
Yeah, I can see why it would cause panic.
The funny thing is, you're not even denying it is panic.
Did 2054 even mention me?
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:35 am
by Nobody Special
Are you even
reading
anymore?
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:46 am
by Empking
Obviously. Otherwise I couldn't make such pertinent replies.
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:57 am
by Oversoul
↑ Empking wrote: ↑ Oversoul wrote:Empking, I already explained why not redFF. And I swear after all I have done for this fucking town.
Where?
...Something which doesn't seem like a Serial Killer could even make.
Would you mind confirming for me that you know that's nonsense, Mastin.
Mastin: OS' reaction to you was to react as if there was new info he had to consider. If he was town he'd know your case was wrong, he wouldn't need to give it much thought. He certainly wouldn't unvote in response.
Yes I would actually need to unvote. Mastin really made me suspicious and at that time I hadn't made up my mind whether or not Mastin was being a derp or if he was legitimately trying to force a lynch through based on my revelations of the Pine kill and the mysterious Night 3 no SK kill leading right to the SK.
Mastin, subjectively, it doesn't matter.
The kill on Pine only makes sense for fear that Pine would claim actions (night 3) and thus confirm that someone was the SK (it would become apparent later in the game when no roleblocking roles were left).
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:58 am
by Nobody Special
Empking wrote:
Obviously. Otherwise I couldn't make such pertinent replies.
If you're reading, how can you honestly ask whether 2054 mentioned you?
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:59 am
by Empking
↑ Nobody Special wrote:Empking wrote:
Obviously. Otherwise I couldn't make such pertinent replies.
If you're reading, how can you honestly ask whether 2054 mentioned you?
Oh I didn't read that.
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:13 am
by Nobody Special
...
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:19 am
by Oversoul
Somebody lynch him, please. His reaction is a fail.
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:56 am
by Empking
↑ Oversoul wrote:Somebody lynch him, please. His reaction is a fail.
What reaction?
Why is it fail?
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:29 pm
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
Update tomorrow. Don't give up now, guys.
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:48 pm
by redFF
STOP
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:34 pm
by redFF
HAMMERTIME
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:35 pm
by redFF
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:39 pm
by Empking
The lack of anything confirms Oversoul as scum BTW. Not sure why, just does.
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:54 pm
by Nobody Special
Based primarily on Emp's slip-up about whether or not he was mentioned in a particular post, I think he's getting lazy and cruising.
Please let this be the right thing to do....
Vote: Empking
With any luck, that's game.
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:12 pm
by Empking
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:19 pm
by Nobody Special
Nope.
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:25 pm
by Empking
May I ask what the slip was? What was I trying to say when that slipped out?
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:31 pm
by Nobody Special
Here's you slip, and I wish I knew what you were trying to say.
But you still need to die.
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:36 pm
by Empking
That really doesn't look like a slip to me at all. Oh well.
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:39 pm
by Nobody Special
But you were caught NOT READING THE GAME.
Scum tend to not read as closely as they could. Or should.
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:47 pm
by Empking
↑ Nobody Special wrote:But you were caught NOT READING THE GAME.
Scum tend to not read as closely as they could. Or should.
It wasn't so much "caught" as being "completely frank about it". You don't learn much from the walls of Serial Killers as my old granddad used to say (I never knew what he really meant before today.)
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 2:52 am
by mastin2
Pretty sure that's game.
Empking's acting like caught-scum.
Paraphrased, it's like he's literally saying, "Dang. I thought I had a chance. So, what was it that gave me away? *after reasons are given* I can't believe I was hammered over such poor reasoning!"