Page 84 of 110

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:15 am
by Slandaar
Final scum is a pr claim obviously so you should lean a different direction. There isn't 7 town pr.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:52 am
by hiplop
VOTE: lq[/vote] obvscum

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:53 am
by hiplop
VOTE: lq

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:36 am
by Slandaar
Mafia Voyeur

Town IC
Town Friendly Neighbour / Role cop / Neapolitan

Doc
Watcher
Tracker
Gunsmith
Infinity Claim

All effectively 1 shot but clearly too much as Voyeur is pretty weak.

Doc doesn't make much sense in a N2 setup as town can never take the numbers back to odd if they successfully protect with the current claims. Slightly depends on Infinity not claiming a RB type role/Vig but then Vedith is scum when that happens so meh. Not saying its definite but its something to consider.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:56 am
by Marquis
VOTECOUNT 3.05


0
Firebringer

0
hiplop

0
Infinity 324

0
JarJarDrinks

+3
LicketyQuickety
— Vedith, MariaR, hiplop
(L-2)

0
MariaR

0
Raskolnikov

+1
Slandaar
— Raskolnikov
0
Vedith


+5
NOT VOTING
— Firebringer, Infinity 324, JarJarDrinks, LicketyQuickety, Slandaar

With 9 alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.

Deadline is in
(expired on 2016-09-09 00:00:00)
(Fri Sep 9 @ 12:00 AM EST)
.

Awaiting prod responses from: N/A
Searching for replacements for: N/A
Vacation/Limited Access: N/A

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:57 am
by MariaR
Watcher Doctor and IC seems a bit overkill to me

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:58 am
by Firebringer
In post 2066, JarJarDrinks wrote:Fire is now pretty much confirmed cause of RB/LQ interactions.
I am confirmed!
we did it

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:01 pm
by LicketyQuickety
Honestly I think this is a gambit by JarJar.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:05 pm
by Raskolnikov
wtf LQ I trusted you

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:07 pm
by Raskolnikov
Get infinity claim before day end though, don't put LQ in selfhammer range yet.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:30 pm
by Firebringer
In post 2082, LicketyQuickety wrote:Honestly I think this is a gambit by JarJar.
lol, really?

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:35 pm
by Raskolnikov
@jarjar disagree
hip protecting slandaar over any PR claims doesn't make sense

dgb/lq/hip the dream

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:48 pm
by LicketyQuickety
In post 2085, Firebringer wrote:
In post 2082, LicketyQuickety wrote:Honestly I think this is a gambit by JarJar.
lol, really?
Yup. There is no vig so the only person who can have a gun is Mafia. This means that it makes way more sense for the mod to just use the role of Cop for JarJar.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:53 pm
by Firebringer
so instead of thinking he is faking a result/is scum you think he is just town faking this?

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:54 pm
by JarJarDrinks
Raskolnikov wrote:@jarjar disagree
hip protecting slandaar over any PR claims doesn't make sense

dgb/lq/hip the dream
i guess mafia doc makes sense as a false innocent w/ gunsmith

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:56 pm
by LicketyQuickety
In post 2088, Firebringer wrote:so instead of thinking he is faking a result/is scum you think he is just town faking this?
It would be really dumb to claim a guilty on a VT, don't you think? Then again, all the actions are done with so it could be Mafia making a sack fly to get rid of someone with good reads. IDK for sure now.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:58 pm
by Firebringer
In post 2090, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2088, Firebringer wrote:so instead of thinking he is faking a result/is scum you think he is just town faking this?
It would be really dumb to claim a guilty on a VT, don't you think? Then again, all the actions are done with so it could be Mafia making a sack fly to get rid of someone with good reads. IDK for sure now.
Why would he as town fake a result on a VT as well?
He claimed PR the other day, did he not?

Like if he is lying he should retract at this point.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:58 pm
by MariaR
Yeah as I said with an innocent child I understand 1 of watcher/doc but 2 seems overkill but Infinity's claim could help

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:59 pm
by MariaR
In post 2091, Firebringer wrote:
In post 2090, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2088, Firebringer wrote:so instead of thinking he is faking a result/is scum you think he is just town faking this?
It would be really dumb to claim a guilty on a VT, don't you think? Then again, all the actions are done with so it could be Mafia making a sack fly to get rid of someone with good reads. IDK for sure now.
Why would he as town fake a result on a VT as well?
He claimed PR the other day, did he not?

Like if he is lying he should retract at this point.
When did you get srs I don't like it :neutral:

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:59 pm
by Firebringer
i like the setup speculation on a game where all the actions are only done on one night.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:59 pm
by Firebringer
In post 2093, MariaR wrote:
In post 2091, Firebringer wrote:
In post 2090, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2088, Firebringer wrote:so instead of thinking he is faking a result/is scum you think he is just town faking this?
It would be really dumb to claim a guilty on a VT, don't you think? Then again, all the actions are done with so it could be Mafia making a sack fly to get rid of someone with good reads. IDK for sure now.
Why would he as town fake a result on a VT as well?
He claimed PR the other day, did he not?

Like if he is lying he should retract at this point.
When did you get srs I don't like it :neutral:
Toothless ran out of fish, so he has to hunt for scum who have all the fish.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:01 pm
by JarJarDrinks
In post 2093, MariaR wrote:
In post 2091, Firebringer wrote:
In post 2090, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2088, Firebringer wrote:so instead of thinking he is faking a result/is scum you think he is just town faking this?
It would be really dumb to claim a guilty on a VT, don't you think? Then again, all the actions are done with so it could be Mafia making a sack fly to get rid of someone with good reads. IDK for sure now.
Why would he as town fake a result on a VT as well?
He claimed PR the other day, did he not?

Like if he is lying he should retract at this point.
When did you get srs I don't like it :neutral:
He's confirmed town now.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:01 pm
by MariaR
*Puts down a chocolate covered fish and hides in fear*

Pedit: Doesn't mean I like it!

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:02 pm
by Firebringer
In post 2096, JarJarDrinks wrote:He's confirmed town now.
If we say it enough times, maybe scum will NK me.
So shhhhhh

I want to be here at the endgame.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:02 pm
by LicketyQuickety
In post 2091, Firebringer wrote:
In post 2090, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2088, Firebringer wrote:so instead of thinking he is faking a result/is scum you think he is just town faking this?
It would be really dumb to claim a guilty on a VT, don't you think? Then again, all the actions are done with so it could be Mafia making a sack fly to get rid of someone with good reads. IDK for sure now.
Why would he as town fake a result on a VT as well?
He claimed PR the other day, did he not?

Like if he is lying he should retract at this point.
manuel claimed PR as well.. he said he was unsure on me (or I got that impression) close to EOD. Its a pretty decent gambit considering he already has the PR claim. I have had gambits like this thrown at me before, recently even to try and sort my alignment because I am kinda hard to read because I have a pretty scummy meta.