Mafiascum.net

Also saying I don't want to elim her isn't entirely true.
While its not my preference, if her content sucks, I'm voting her.

In post 2074, Infinity 324 wrote:If you just said that I’d be ok with it but it feels like you were making up bad reasons.

bro im saying it right nwo

everythign I said about the slot is what I feel bro

I might have even said that earlier tbh hold on

ok i don't remember where I said it
but I feel like I did
/shrug

In post 2041, Uncrowned wrote:like everyone's reasons for TRing gamma in particular were just... no offense kinda trash imo? He was playing such a null game D1 which lead to everyone just handing him TRs for... reasons? "the vibe"? idk.

there's definitely been a metric fucktonne of bad trajectory reads this game

I won’t deny my game D1 was null-ish
But that doesn’t make my entire game a wash?

Also, who is this “everyone” you speak of? Give names.

In post 1741, MURDERCAT wrote:I think because tracy is the partner and they wanted the inno on tracy.

it's not an inno though?

In post 1741, MURDERCAT wrote:a suspicious hammer.

In post 1744, Purple Heart wrote:- Hammer can be a scum hammer.

why?

In post 2081, tracy flick wrote:

In post 1741, MURDERCAT wrote:I think because tracy is the partner and they wanted the inno on tracy.

it's not an inno though?

In post 1741, MURDERCAT wrote:a suspicious hammer.

In post 1744, Purple Heart wrote:- Hammer can be a scum hammer.

why?

what do you mean why what??????

In post 1752, kookiemonster wrote:

In post 1737, tracy flick wrote:

In post 1662, kookiemonster wrote:Like I don't necessarily have a problem with what they say but they only pop in every now and then to comment on like one thing

i mean, if you want me to comment on anything you can just ask,

hello! why are you shading your top TR?

i think i also was thinking about this:

In post 1628, Uncrowned wrote:Tracy actually fits into a similar category to Gamma from what I was seeing. I was seeing far more talk of who should be in the council in her ISO than real attempts to solve outside of some shading on OWER

when i said that. quantifying how the council should be chosen interests me.

In post 2082, Purple Heart wrote:what do you mean why what??????

like why would it be likely to be a scum hammer? or suspicious, as murdercat put it.

In post 2084, tracy flick wrote:

In post 2082, Purple Heart wrote:what do you mean why what??????

like why would it be likely to be a scum hammer? or suspicious, as murdercat put it.

why wouldn't it?

look u gonna post content or whaaaaat

In post 2085, Purple Heart wrote:why wouldn't it?

well because it wasn't. but also because it felt pretty standard fare for me. like i don't see why it'd be scummy.

If you know your D1 was null than why aren't you concerned with the fact that people handed you zero effort TRs? I'm often more suspect of half assed TRs than I am SRs.

and by everyone I mean... well, pretty much everyone? the only person I really recall actively against you was OWER? maybe kookie as well? Infinity and MCAT jump to mind as prime examples of people who handed you early TRs for what I thought was nothing

In post 2087, tracy flick wrote:like i don't see why it'd be scummy.

holy shit
you never see scum hammer like how you did?

In post 1741, MURDERCAT wrote:I think there is scum on the council. The flea kill is trying to take a middle of the road approach, making it look like there is no scum on the council (like they were worried about doc) while also framing Purple because there was so much talk about purple in the hood. Why is this better than a no kill? I think because tracy is the partner and they wanted the inno on tracy.

In post 1741, MURDERCAT wrote:So who is the scum on the council? I will say I think it's Gamma.

In post 1856, MURDERCAT wrote:Gamma literally posted 3 times to the effect of "sounds good".

wouldn't this be more likely to lead you to the conclusion that i was partnered with infinity if you thought i was mafia? like if you think i'm mafia because i was tracked and not guiltied (???) wouldn't you think the person orchestrating that was my partner not the one okaying it?

In post 1887, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1733, tracy flick wrote:

In post 1728, MURDERCAT wrote:Can you quote a post or two, not sure I follow

like gamma was fairly inactive and then it felt like he saw an opportunity to me, not sure what you want me to quote

Seriously how the FUCK can y'all call me inactive when I have like 120 posts!??!?!@?!?!?!?!?!!?!? IT KINDA PISSES ME OFFFF

i meant comparatively inactive - like before/after

In post 2088, Uncrowned wrote:If you know your D1 was null than why aren't you concerned with the fact that people handed you zero effort TRs? I'm often more suspect of half assed TRs than I am SRs.

and by everyone I mean... well, pretty much everyone? the only person I really recall actively against you was OWER? maybe kookie as well? Infinity and MCAT jump to mind as prime examples of people who handed you early TRs for what I thought was nothing

Here’s the thing, I don’t think people gave me 0 effort townreads. Honestly the only I can recall atp is like, Infinity, and I guess PH, but PH was self-aware about it, and I suss Infinity rn. Murder did too but I’m not 100% on where his head is at this game.

Beyond that, you, kookie, and OWER were clearly against, but I also recall Flea not entirely liking me?

Now, here’s the thing: I don’t think me not being UTR should have precluded me from being in the council D1. I had explicit reason I wanted the one we got, which was I thought we had chemistry and wanted to check that first-hand. Turns out I was wrong. But barring a hard SR on either murder or infinity I was always going to want that council D1.

In post 2091, tracy flick wrote:

In post 1887, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1733, tracy flick wrote:

In post 1728, MURDERCAT wrote:Can you quote a post or two, not sure I follow

like gamma was fairly inactive and then it felt like he saw an opportunity to me, not sure what you want me to quote

Seriously how the FUCK can y'all call me inactive when I have like 120 posts!??!?!@?!?!?!?!?!!?!? IT KINDA PISSES ME OFFFF

i meant comparatively inactive - like before/after

Gfdi
I don’t think I’m gonna be able to effectively articulate the deal with my Koba read shift at that time yet, so just, don’t vote me out today, okay? Idc about whether I’m on the council or not but voting me out today will be a mistake.

we vote out tracy or infinity before we vote you out tbh so ur safe

unless you did something like
bad
like
really fucking bad

In post 1992, MURDERCAT wrote:Assumption: Two people who never voted each other for council probably aren't the scum team. Dumb assumption but I want to see where the associations are.

hmm still think two people who both voted eachother are less likely to be mafia together. with our powers combined...

In post 2001, MURDERCAT wrote:Also though tracy is super quiet and I want people to agree that if we don't get something from that slot soon we are 100% yeeting it

In post 1997, MURDERCAT wrote:Actually a lot of my mafia time has been meme dance games on discord the past couple of days

a lot of mine has been as well.

In post 2057, Uncrowned wrote:I'm pretty sure if I dont bring up Tracy start of d2 she doesnt get brought up nearly as much for being scummy here

this feels... true? to me.

AGH ugh. this thread blew up. y'all needa calm ur butts.