Mafiascum.net

In post 2074, cyrus62 wrote:VOTE: dgb you have the worse play here . its like look at me i can post a bunch of tiny witter post and try to look town your lamest anit going fly with me.

In post 2066, Roden wrote:I don't think anyone took your "accurate meta tell" as a joke at the time, and I don't think it should be considered a joke

In post 1315, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1301, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.

M E T A

For real though what's your actual case on T3? Since it's definitely not solely based in meta

Well he has done nothing but bad meta read people and hop onto twenty wagons. I'm typically a bit wagon hoppy but the way t3 is doing it makes me think he is trying to muddy any associatives that occur when he flips, and his vote hopping is flailing-adjacent.

In post 2076, Shrek wrote:

In post 2074, cyrus62 wrote:VOTE: dgb you have the worse play here . its like look at me i can post a bunch of tiny witter post and try to look town your lamest anit going fly with me.

what do you think of dgb’s PR claim then? are they faking it?

In post 1905, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1848, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1839, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.

I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.

You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?

The mod can't tell you if your action succeeded, only if it was received.

I'm not "casting doubt" I'm getting clarification because the way you described it is not how it works. If you knew your action succeeded it goes to a hard guilty instead of a soft guilty (cause the action could have been roleblocked)

My bad. I made a mistake in my interpretation.

The link to the neighborhood PT was in my role PM, which I did not notice.

I was expecting to receive a message from the mod regarding my action in the game morn, with a PT if successful (i had forgotten there was already a PT).

The mod did not understand why I was confused in my messages so we were communicating at cross-purposes for while.

So, sigh, now I have to explain that my action succeeded in the sense that the player i targeted was added to that PT (which i didn't notice because i had forgotten its existence) and is in fact town.

If you didn't ask so many questions it could have been a great accidental gambit

I'd probably speed-raptured for this but luckily there is a player that can vouch for me.

In post 1919, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm wondering if this is a hood game...

I ask because I was invited to a hood last Night and wondering if this is a more widespread thing or not.

If you got INVITED to a hood let us know. But don't let us know if you can create hoods.

In post 1977, cyrus62 wrote:

In post 1969, Save The Dragons wrote:any other reads besides nero-scum and uh...you-scum?

Std here's a question do you always lurk as scum. Or was that a one time thing. I get the feeling you must post more as town becuse your trying to solve . However if you need more prof that Nero is scum . Look how fast he moved to vote me once I stated why he was scum.

In post 1993, CheekyTeeky wrote:StD/Gamma scumreading each other but not really pushing is interesting.

In post 2018, Roden wrote:That's because it's probably theatre.

In post 2018, Roden wrote:I'm thinking the scum team consists of some combination of {StD/Gamma/Arc/Mega/Dwlee/Cyrus}, and at this point we absolutely need to boot either StD Mega or Cyrus.

In post 2069, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 2057, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2046, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 1988, cyrus62 wrote:So this is dw and my 6th game 3 of them is town 2 of them is scum so there's a50/50 chance he is scum. So I'm just not going to bother till later.

That is the Gambler's Fallacy.

It’s not even that, it’s just WRONG.

I thought Gambler's Fallacy was exactly this? Assuming something completely random (barring mod corruption which is unlikely) is less likely due to it happening before.